“Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” – Saul Alinsky
A most interesting guest appeared at the Conservative Political Action Council (CPAC) in the morning of its second day. He is an American hero because he bucked the system in the last days of the Trump presidency pushing for an investigation of voting irregularities that occurred simultaneously in 6 swing states around the nation. He was stonewalled and has since been harassed by litigation.
Jeffrey Clark is the former US Assistant Attorney General under Attorney General Bill Barr of the Trump Administration. Clark circulated a draft letter while he was still at the Justice Department on Dec. 28, 2020. That letter recommended Georgia State officials call a special legislative session for the purpose of determining who “won the most legal votes” and also consider appointing a new slate of electors, according to a 2021 Senate Judiciary Committee report. It was never officially submitted.
That draft letter of Clark is found here and below.
To the socialist Democrats on Capitol Hill and the mainstream media that makes him a bad guy. But the part of the story they conveniently leave out which makes him a good guy is what led up to that letter being written.
In early December of 2020 Attorney Bill Barr made a number of statements to the press:
“To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have affected a different outcome in the election,” Barr said to The Associated Press.
“There’s a growing tendency to use the criminal justice system as sort of a default fix-all, and people don’t like something they want the Department of Justice to come in and ‘investigate,’” Barr said.
“Most claims of fraud are very particularized to a particular set of circumstances or actors or conduct. They are not systemic allegations,” he continued. “And those have been run down; they are being run down. Some have been broad and potentially cover a few thousand votes. They have been followed up on.”
You can imagine how Clark must have felt as Barr’s Assistant A.G. not knowing what Barr was talking about. So, he did the logical thing most of us would do, he demanded to see the written records for the investigations Barr was referencing. He got nothing!
Clark went on to explain when A.G. Barr appeared before the “January 6 Select Committee” he referenced just 3 areas related to election theft of November 2020.
- State voting laws unconstitutionally being changed by others in the state other than state legislatures.
- Violations of state election laws set in advance and then violated due to the “Covid cover”.
- Some forms of ballot stuffing.
Clark reported Barr testified to the J6 committee he (Barr) had only looked at the later (3) but the Dinesh D’Souza movie “2000 Mules” offered Barr must not have looked very hard. Clark added that problems with the electronic voting machines should have been investigated since it supposedly caused vote counting to stop around the country, something unprecedented.
Fast forward 18 months into the Joe Biden Administration and Clark had his home raided by agents of the Inspector General’s Office who refused to show him their warrant in June 2022. They made him stand outside his home on his driveway in his underwear refusing to let him get dressed as they ransacked his home. Conveniently, once again, CNN was tipped off and there to film the raid.
“Trump Official Nabbed In His Underwear (Video)” – CNN
The legacy mainstream media went on to mock Clark dubbing him, “The Man with No Pants”. In the CNN video above you can clearly hear Clark asking the FBI for permission to get dressed and being denied!
Thereafter the DC Bar Office of Disciplinary Counsel filed a case against Clark in 2022 alleging he violated rules governing the conduct of licensed attorneys (ignoring all of his immunities). This is a typical tactic of the socialist Democrats we saw during the Covid-19 pandemic when they went after licenses of doctors and medical professionals that did not toe the Tony Fauci protocol line.
Clark has tried, unsuccessfully, to persuade the US District Court for the District of Columbia to intervene. So Friday, February 23, he was to make oral argument for the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to act.
Clark’s written arguments state the bar lacks jurisdiction to prosecute him over advice he gave a sitting president. His case is the only one his legal team is aware of where a state or local bar “has attempted to exercise disciplinary authority over a high-ranking, Senate-confirmed federal government official for actions taken in the course of his duty.”
If these appeals judges back the ruling of the lower district court, the matter goes back to the DC Bar. From there the DC Bar could sanction Clark with punishments ranging from a written warning to disbarment. Clark would most probably then contest any sanctions back to the appeals court.
Clark is also a defendant in the Georgia RICO case against Trump brought on by Fulton County DA Fani Willis where he pled not guilty. He surrendered last August, around the same time as fellow Trump attorneys Sidney Powell, Rudy Giuliani, and John Eastman, and posted a $100,000 bail.
CONCLUSION:
One of the funniest and most jaw dropping moments of the Clark interview was when he made Fulton County DA Fani Willis look like a bigger partisan fraud than she already does for charging him with racketeering for simply thinking about sending his draft letter linked above he never sent. He said:
“The whole thing is absurd. Most of these 19 people don’t even know each other so the idea that we had formulated some kind of short term mafia to hijack the election is ridiculous. You know? But that hasn’t stopped the New York Times from claiming I was one of the coup plotters in chief along with my friend John Eastman and President Trump and they said Rudy Giuliani etcetera… I have never met Rudy Giuliani. So the whole thing is crazy and it should collapse of its own weight, and in particular my case and President Trump’s case and Mark Meadows, who was the White House Chief of Staff… We should all be immune from that prosecution because the states shouldn’t be able to reach into the Federal government and regulate Federal officials. It’s a total legal absurdity.”
Copyright © 2024 by Mark S. Schwendau
