Appeals Court Judge Blocks Parts of DeSantis’s Big Tech Censorship Law

The Epoch Times Header

PUNTA GORDA, Fla.–A Federal Court of Appeals ruled on May 23 that it is unconstitutional for Florida to prohibit social media companies from banning politicians, handing Gov. Ron DeSantis a blow to combat online censorship.

The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in a 67-page opinion upheld an injunction blocking key parts of Florida’s social media law and said that meddling with the platforms’ content moderation policies ran afoul of the First Amendment.

“We conclude that social-media platforms’ content-moderation activities—permitting, removing, prioritizing, and deprioritizing users and posts—constitute ‘speech’ within the meaning of the First Amendment,” the court wrote.

NetChoice and the Computer & Communications Industry Association—two social media trade associations—challenged the law that was signed last year.

“Put simply, with minor exceptions, the government can’t tell a private person or entity what to say or how to say it,” the court wrote.

DeSantis had disputed the fact that social media companies were biased towards conservatives and were silencing their political speech after former president Donald Trump was banned from Twitter and other social media platforms, which sparked outrage from Republicans as well as DeSantis.

The court wrote that content-moderation decisions are protected exercises of editorial judgment.

Last May, the governor signed a bill prohibiting social media companies from “de-platforming” political candidates prioritizing or deprioritizing messages pertaining to candidates and removing anything posted by a “journalistic enterprise” based on its content and could have cost social media companies $250,000-a-day fines for banning a candidate.

With the court blocking major provisions, it allowed some of the regulations to stay such as a requirement that users be able to access their data for up to 60 days after they are banned, and companies must disclose the standards they use to moderate the content.

In contrast, in early May the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals allowed Texas to enforce a law similar to Florida’s law targeting Big Tech. Trade groups that represented social media companies have appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court in an effort to block the law.

De Santis’ office told The Epoch Times in a statement, “Although the 11th Circuit approved some provisions of the law, we are nevertheless disappointed that the court continues to permit censorship.

“The court’s central holding that social media platforms are similar to newspapers and parades, rather than common carriers that transmit others’ messages, is stupefying. Floridians know differently.

“Our office is currently reviewing the options for appeal. We will continue to fight big tech censorship and protect the First Amendment rights of Floridians.”

By Jannis Falkenstern

Read Full Article on TheEpochTimes.com

The Epoch Times
The Epoch Timeshttps://www.theepochtimes.com/
Tired of biased news? The Epoch Times is truthful, factual news that other media outlets don't report. No spin. No agenda. Just honest journalism like it used to be.

Columns

Shifting Gears 2025

That grinding you hear is the sound of the Democrat party hopelessly stuck in first gear while Trump and Republicans zoom ahead of them in overdrive.

More Proof, the Democratic Party is Imploding!

Jason Pizzo, the leading Democrat in the Florida Senate announced his departure from the Democratic Party saying he sees the party as dead in Florida.

American Psychiatric Association vs. MAHA: Shots Fired

When Trump formed the MAHA Commission, the parameters were so reasonable that it was hard to imagine how the biomedical establishment could object.

Evaluating Foreign Affairs’ Warning About The Risks Of An Emboldened & Remilitarized Germany

Foreign Affairs warned earlier this month that an emboldened...

9 Things to Know About UK Supreme Court Ruling on Sex, Gender

Britain’s highest court has ruled that the words “woman” and “sex” refer to “a biological woman and biological sex,” in a landmark decision.

News

Thousands of Illegal Immigrants Have Registered on CBP Home App to Self-Deport, CBP Says

DHS said thousands of illegal immigrants registered on CBP Home app to self-deport, and those who have not yet done so will face consequences.

5 Things We Know About Wisconsin Judge’s Arrest for Allegedly Obstructing ICE

Court papers detail Judge Hannah Dugan was arrested for allowing an illegal immigrant to escape through a jury door before arrest by federal officials.

ICE Backtracks on Revoking More Than 1,200 Student Visas

ICE reversed decision to automatically revoke student visas, after State Dept said it would use AI to review foreign students’ records for criminal activity or arrests.

Court Ruling Limits Ozempic Copies in Favor of FDA, Novo Nordisk

Federal court ruled against trade group representing compounding pharmacies, siding with FDA and Novo Nordisk in dispute over copies of Ozempic and Wegovy.

Judge Blocks Removal of Potential Deportees From Texas District

Federal judge temporarily restrained Trump admin from removing individuals from Southern District of Texas in attempt to deport Venezuelan gang members under the Alien Enemies Act.

Former Rep. George Santos Sentenced to More Than 7 Years in Prison

Former Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.) was sentenced on April 25 to more than 7 years in federal prison on wire fraud and aggravated identity theft charges.

FBI Arrests Wisconsin Judge Hannah Dugan Over Obstructing, Kash Patel Says

FBI arrested a Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, circuit judge for allegedly assisting an illegal immigrant in evading arrest, FBI Director Kash Patel said.

Former New Mexico Judge, Wife Arrested Over Alleged Evidence Tampering

Inmate bookingreports released by Doña Ana County Detention Center show Judge Cano and his wife were arrested for evidence tampering.
spot_img

Related Articles