Authors Conclude ‘Relatively Safe’ as Dozens of Children Die After COVID-19 Vaccination

Courageous Discourse: Perter McCullough Header

Published reports whitewashing fatal complications

As an author and editor, I have always lived by a principle of medical publication that the conclusions must be supported by the data presented. Many have asked me why do doctors still support COVID-19 vaccination with all safety data systems reporting record mortality after injection—many cases occurring on the same day or in the next few days after administration? The reason may be what doctors are concluding from the data in peer-reviewed manuscripts does not match the information disclosed.

Villa-Zapata and coworkers published a report from VAERS on the “safety” of COVID-19 vaccination in children age 5 to 17 and in the data table, there are 56 deaths! Also listed are other potentially fatal complications such as anaphylaxis and myocarditis. The authors concluded that COVID-19 vaccination in children is “relatively safe.”

Any person reading this report should be shocked and appalled by news of 56 children losing their lives after COVID-19 vaccination. The vast majority of reports to VAERS are made by doctors and health care providers who believe the vaccine was the cause of the problem reported.

The CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] generates a temporary number followed by a permanent VAERS [Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System] number when the event is confirmed (e.g., fatal events confirmed by death certificate or national death index). VAERS cases represent the tip of the iceberg and grossly under-represent reality. This means the number of childhood deaths could be 30-fold greater—or 1680 for 2021.

In summary, the COVID-19 pandemic has taught clinical scholars to ignore the written conclusions by authors who may have conflicts of interest. They may have taken COVID-19 vaccines themselves and cannot psychologically recognize what is happening with catastrophic safety outcomes in the populations studied.

The data must be evaluated independently and it is up to the reader to draw his or her own inferences. My conclusion is that COVID-19 vaccines are unsafe for human use and one child lost after injection is one too many. They must be pulled off the market.

Read Original Article on PeterMcCulloughmd.substack.com

Reference

Villa-Zapata L, Gomez-Lumbreras A, Lee Y, Tan MS, Malone D. COVID-19 vaccine adverse events in a population aged 5-17 years: a study from the VAERS database. An Pediatr (Engl Ed). 2023 Apr;98(4):310-312. doi: 10.1016/j.anpede.2022.10.011. Epub 2023 Mar 13. PMID: 36922249; PMCID: PMC10009742.

Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times. Epoch Health welcomes professional discussion and friendly debate. To submit an opinion piece, please follow these guidelines and submit through our form here.

By Dr. Peter A. McCullough MD and John Leake

Substack
Substackhttps://substack.com/
Substack believes that great writers, bloggers, thinkers, and creatives of every background should be able generate income from their audiences on their own terms.

Columns

How Legal Immigration Is Keeping Farms Afloat

The H-2A visa program is an example of how legal immigration can supply labor in America, but farmers say reform is needed.

Trump’s EO to Reduce Drug Prices Explained

Trump signed an Executive Order to bring the prices Americans pay for prescription drugs in line with those paid by other nations around the world.

Parents of Autistic Children Weigh In on RFK Jr.’s Plan to Find the Cause

‘The bottom line is we want the truth. We want safe products for our kids,’ said an Ohio dad with an autistic child.

Fighting the Idiocracy

Despite our country's noble efforts to defend freedom and liberty across the globe we now find ourselves defending democracy against idiocracy.

Recent Sun Activity Could Trigger Major Earthquakes

A number of scientists around the world are sharing concerns about an imminent global seismic event.

News

5 Takeaways From Supreme Court Hearing on Nationwide Injunctions, Birthright Citizenship

Supreme Court heard oral arguments in relation to Trump admin’s request to lift nationwide injunctions placed on president’s birthright citizenship order.

Federal Judge Blocks Trump’s Order to Strip Foreign Service Bargaining Rights

Judge temporarily blocked President Trump’s order stripping foreign service workers of collective bargaining rights, granting a preliminary injunction.

New Era of ‘Supply Shocks’ Could Force Higher Long-Term Interest Rates, Says Powell

A period of supply disruptions may reshape the U.S. economy, leading to unstable inflation and sustained higher interest rates, says Chair Jerome Powell.

FTC Warns StubHub Over Apparent Failure to List Total Price of Tickets

Ahead of the 2025 NFL season, the FTC sent a letter to StubHub calling for strict compliance with the agency’s new Rule on Unfair or Deceptive Fees.

Supreme Court Rules 9–0 That Excessive Force Lawsuit May Proceed Against Police Officer

Supreme Court ruled that the mother of a man killed by police during a traffic stop may pursue a civil rights lawsuit against the officer who shot him.

Supreme Court Wrestles With Nationwide Injunctions in Birthright Citizenship Case

Supreme Court grappled with how far federal judges could go in issuing sweeping blocks on policies such as Trump’s order restricting birthright citizenship.

Lawsuit Alleges Musk, Election PAC Failed to Pay Swing State Petition Signers

Lawsuit filed against Musk and his PAC accuses them of failing to pay registered voters in swing states for signing petition supporting candidate Trump.

Trump Weighs In on Supreme Court Case Involving Birthright Citizenship

President Trump weighed in on the U.S. Supreme Court hearing arguments in a case involving his order to limit birthright citizenship.
spot_img

Related Articles