Defending American Companies and Innovators From Overseas Extortion and Unfair Fines and Penalties

Contact Your Elected Officials

MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY

     THE SECRETARY OF COMMERCE

     THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

     THE SENIOR COUNSELOR TO THE PRESIDENT FOR TRADE

     AND MANUFACTURING

SUBJECT:       Defending American Companies and Innovators From
               Overseas Extortion and Unfair Fines and Penalties
 
     Section 1.  Purpose.  In recent years, the gross domestic product of the United Statesโ€™ digital economy alone, driven by cutting-edge American technology companies, has been bigger than the entire economy of Australia, Canada, or most members of the European Union.  Instead of empowering their own workers and economies, foreign governments have increasingly exerted extraterritorial authority over American companies, particularly in the technology sector, hindering these companiesโ€™ success and appropriating revenues that should contribute to our Nationโ€™s well-being, not theirs.  
 
     Beginning in 2019, several trading partners enacted digital services taxes (DSTs) that could cost American companies billions of dollars and that foreign government officials openly admit are designed to plunder American companies.  Foreign countries have additionally adopted regulations governing digital services that are more burdensome and restrictive on United States companies than their own domestic companies.  Additional foreign legal regimes limit cross-border data flows, require American streaming services to fund local productions, and charge network usage and Internet termination fees.  All of these measures violate American sovereignty and offshore American jobs, limit American companiesโ€™ global competitiveness, and increase American operational costs while exposing our sensitive information to potentially hostile foreign regulators.
 
     My Administration will not allow American companies and workers and American economic and national security interests to be compromised by one-sided, anti-competitive policies and practices of foreign governments.  American businesses will no longer prop up failed foreign economies through extortive fines and taxes.
 
     Sec. 2.  Policy.  It is the policy of my Administration that where a foreign government, through its tax or regulatory structure, imposes a fine, penalty, tax, or other burden that is discriminatory, disproportionate, or designed to transfer significant funds or intellectual property from American companies to the foreign government or the foreign governmentโ€™s favored domestic entities, my Administration will act, imposing tariffs and taking such other responsive actions necessary to mitigate the harm to the United States and to repair any resulting imbalance.
 
     In taking such responsive action, my Administration shall consider:
 
     (a)  taxes imposed on United States companies by foreign governments, including those that may discriminate against United States companies;
 
     (b)  regulations imposed on United States companies by foreign governments that could inhibit the growth or intended operation of United States companies;
 
     (c)  any act, policy, or practice of a foreign government that could require a United States company to jeopardize its intellectual property; and
 
     (d)  Any other act, policy, or practice of a foreign government that serves to undermine the global competitiveness of United States companies.  
 

     Sec. 3.  Agency Responsibilities.  (a)  The United States Trade Representative shall determine, in accordance with applicable law, whether to renew investigations under section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2411) of the DSTs of France, Austria, Italy, Spain, Turkey, and the United Kingdom, which were initiated under my Administration on July 16, 2019, and June 5, 2020.  If the United States Trade Representative determines to renew such investigations, he shall take all appropriate and feasible action in response to those DSTs.

     (b)  The United States Trade Representative shall determine, consistent with section 302(b) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2412(b)) (section 302(b)), whether to investigate the DST of any other country that may discriminate against United States companies or burden or restrict United States commerce.  He shall further determine whether to pursue a panel under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement on the DST imposed by Canada and whether to investigate Canadaโ€™s DST under section 302(b).  In making these determinations, the United States Trade Representative shall consult with the Secretary of the Treasury, as appropriate.
 
     (c)  The Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Commerce, and the United States Trade Representative shall jointly identify trade and other regulatory practices by other countries, including, without limitation, those described in section 2 of this memorandum, that discriminate against, disproportionately affect, or otherwise undermine the global competitiveness or intended operation of United States companies, in the digital economy and more generally, and recommend to me appropriate actions to counter such practices under applicable authorities.  The United States Trade Representative shall include the results of this review as part of the report required in section 5(c) of the Presidential Memorandum of January 20, 2025 (America First Trade Policy) (America First Trade Policy Memorandum).
 
     (d)  The Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Commerce, and the United States Trade Representative shall investigate whether any act, policy, or practice of any country in the European Union or the United Kingdom has the effect of requiring or incentivizing the use or development of United States companiesโ€™ products or services in ways that undermine freedom of speech and political engagement or otherwise moderate content, and recommend appropriate actions to counter such practices under applicable authorities.  The United States Trade Representative shall include the results of this review as part of the report required in section 5(c) of the America First Trade Policy Memorandum.
 
     (e)  The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of Commerce and the United States Trade Representative, shall determine whether any foreign country subjects United States citizens or companies, including, without limitation, in the digital economy, to discriminatory or extraterritorial taxes, or has any tax measure in place that otherwise undermines the global competitiveness of United States companies, is inconsistent with any tax treaty of the United States, or is otherwise actionable under section 891 of title 26, United States Code, or other tax-related legal authority.  The Secretary of the Treasury shall include the results of this determination as part of the report required in section 2 of the Presidential Memorandum of January 20, 2025 (The Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) Global Tax Deal).
 
     (f)  The United States Trade Representative shall identify tools the United States can use to secure among trading partners a permanent moratorium on customs duties on electronic transmissions.  The United States Trade Representative shall include the results of this review as part of the report required in section 5(c) of the America First Trade Policy Memorandum.
 
     (g)  The United States Trade Representative, in consultation with the Secretary of Commerce and the Senior Counselor to the President for Trade and Manufacturing, shall establish a process that allows American businesses to report to the United States Trade Representative foreign tax or regulatory practices that disproportionately harm United States companies.
 
     Sec. 4.  General Provisions.  (a)  Nothing in this memorandum shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
 
          (i)   the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or
 
          (ii)  the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
 
     (b)  This memorandum shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
 
     (c)  This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

     (d)  The United States Trade Representative is authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.

Donald Trump
Donald Trumphttps://thedeskofdonaldtrump.com/
Statements provided by 45th President of the United States, Donald Trump, including interviews or other content conservatives will find useful and interesting.

Understanding the freedom of speech difficulty UK ?

Freedom of speech in the UK, shaped by evolving laws, faces legal conflictsโ€”highlighted by Nigel Farageโ€™s recent U.S. Congress testimony.

US Supreme Court Asked to Rule on Whether Private Citizens Can Enforce Voting Rights Act

A lower court ruled earlier this year that only...

Judicial activism has run amok

Judge Charles Breyer blocked Trump's use of California's National Guard, citing the Posse Comitatus Act, sparking debate over presidential authority.

The SCO & BRICS Play Complementary Roles In Gradually Transforming Global Governance

SCO and BRICS will gradually shape global governance, not abruptly, due to diverse members and non-binding decisions slowing consensus.

Transitioning from Regulatory Sclerosis to Arbitrary State Capitalism

The Trump administration is moving from reducing the size and regulatory power of the federal government to the formation of State Capitalism.

Democrats Highlight August Organizing, Say They Want Bipartisan Deal to Avert Shutdown

Rep Hakeem Jeffries said during recess Democrats organized across the country and will seek a bipartisan spending bill as Congress with Sept. 30 deadline.

Judge Reverses Trump Adminโ€™s Harvard Funding Freeze

Federal judge blocked Trump adminโ€™s bid to freeze $2B in Harvard funding, ruling it violated the First Amendment in its anti-Semitism efforts.

Putin, Xi Hot Mic Moment on Organ Transplants Underscores Concerns Over Organ Harvesting in China

On Sept. 3, a hot mic caught China and Russiaโ€™s leaders discussing about organ transplants and living to 150 as they walked side by side.

Pfizer CEO Says Trump Should Receive Nobel Prize for Operation Warp Speed

Pfizerโ€™s CEO praised President Trump, saying he deserves a Nobel Peace Prize for Operation Warp Speed that sped COVID-19 vaccine delivery.

Trump to Host Polandโ€™s New President Nawrocki at the White House

President Donald Trump will host Polandโ€™s newly elected president, Karol Nawrocki, at the White House on Sept. 3.

Trump Announces Space Command Moving to Alabama

โ€œI am thrilled to report that the U.S. Space Command headquarters will move to beautiful Huntsville, Alabama,โ€ President Trump said.

Trump Takes Aim at Crime in Chicago After Dozens Shot Over Weekend

President Trump said that he will โ€œsoonโ€ take actions to deal with crime in Chicago, weeks after he sent National Guard troops to Washington, D.C.

Trump Says India Offered Zero Tariffs After Decades of โ€˜One-Sidedโ€™ Trade

President Trump said India offered to cut tariffs on U.S. goods to zero, calling it a long-overdue fix for decades of one-sided trade.
spot_img

Related Articles