Dem Groups Are Trying to Eliminate “Election Lawyers” and Trump’s Attorney Needs Your Help to Stop Them

Contact Your Elected Officials

Donate to John Eastman’s Defense

Remember the shenanigans of the 2020 election? The mail-in vote flooding, the late night ballot-counting, the illegal last-minute modifications of election procedures? As we gear up for another election year, the powers-that-be have decided that the matter is closed and it’s time to forget all that. They even have ways of making you forget.

Now there are several new advocacy groups funded by millions in “dark money” dedicated to shutting down any lawyer involved in shedding light on election issues. Groups like the 65 Project and States United Democracy Center staffed by the usual crew of longtime Democrat party activists and RINO never-Trumpers are looking to bury concerned lawyers under a mountain of official complaints. Their stated tactics are disbarments, “making them toxic in their communities and in their own firms” and destroying their careers. It’s explicitly personal, right out of the Saul Alinsky playbook. If they can destroy anyone who officially investigates the integrity of our elections, they can keep using the same bag of tricks that worked for them in 2020 forever.

The result is a massive chilling effect on the practice of election law and the loss of the profession entirely.

Today there’s one man speaking out. John Eastman is a constitutional scholar who, through his long career, has clerked at the Supreme Court, served as an attorney at Kirkland & Ellis where he specialized in constitutional litigation, taught constitutional law at Chapman University in California, and served as dean of the school. In 2020 he helped President Trump evaluate issues arising from the 2020 election and has been involved in election integrity efforts since then. Now the Democrat lawfare machine has him in their sights. On Tuesday this week he went before the State Bar of California to defend himself against disbarment, a trial engineered by the activist States United Democracy Center who filed complaints against him. He also faces a bar complaint filed against him with SCOTUS by the 65 Project.

These are unfortunately just the beginning of his troubles. He’s also been approached by the FBI at the behest of the January 6th committee, even though he was nowhere near the Capitol on that day. He’s had his address printed in local newspapers and radical activists picket his house on a daily basis. They have even set spikes in his gravel driveway to damage the cars of his family and visitors, thrown dog feces at his house, and graffiti’d his street to direct more protestors to his home.

But Eastman is committed to speaking out. In a just-released interview with Chairman of the Claremont Institute Tom Klingenstein, we can hear his justification: “Our justice system depends on competent representation on both sides of the adversarial process.” Indeed it does. Ever since John Adams defended the perpetrators of the Boston Massacre, the right to representation has been an American ideal and a constitutionally-guaranteed right. Throughout the interview, he comes across as reasonable, principled, and good humored; a scholar in full command of the relevant facts related to a very murky and unfortunate situation. It’s a remarkable discussion.

Eastman goes on to elaborate how in the days leading up to January 6th, he identified several illegalities in changes to state election procedures and made tenable arguments based on history and constitutional precedent for how the Vice President and Congress could potentially address those illegalities.

Donate to John Eastman’s Defense

Now, the swamp creatures who inhabit the “advocacy groups” that haunt the beltway are destroying the ideal of representation and reasoned debate. They don’t need to argue in court, you see, they just need to make it impossible to be heard in court at all. They do this by going after not only the lawyers, but even the arguments themselves. That’s right, they want to make it impossible to make certain election related arguments in a court of law.

For John Eastman, this is the crux of the issue. His persecutors accuse him of making arguments in bad faith that violate a lawyer’s oath to uphold the Constitution, an extraordinary precedent considering the complexity and nuance of constitutional interpretation throughout American history. If some interpretations of the Constitution can be effectively sanctioned, how would it be possible to advance new arguments based on novel interpretations, as lawyers do all the time?

In John’s words from the interview “[They] are assessing my ability to make judgements about a very sophisticated and nuanced Constitutional argument.” The irony is that the lawyers who made the complaints, as well as those at the California Bar who are investigating John, are not by any means constitutional scholars themselves!

Democrat party legal activists have realized they can lock in certain interpretations of the Constitution not through rulings (they don’t want to go to the Supreme Court for obvious reasons) but through procedure. Just like the science behind climate change and COVID-19, dissenting opinions are not allowed: the interpretation of the law is settled now, not by the courts or by the legislatures but by an unaccountable body of “experts” funded by the same networks that fund the nonprofits seeking and destroying conservative lawyers like Eastman.

It goes without saying that if these people succeed in what they’re doing, elections in the United States would be compromised — perhaps forever. Right now the 65 Project proudly displays over two dozen ethics complaints they have filed against lawyers involved in election investigations. According to David Brock, the leader of the project, their intent is that: “[Project 65] will not only bring the grievances in the bar complaints but shame them and make them toxic in their communities.” Unfortunately they are just getting started. These people need to be resisted now before it’s too late.

You can give to John Eastman’s official legal defense fund using GiveSendGo.

Here’s a statement from John Eastman after the first day of his Bar hearing in California on Tuesday:

“I’m glad we can finally get going, so reasonable people can see that I have a solid basis for the representations I made in my capacity representing the President.

The big picture here is that these sorts of challenges from privately-funded nonprofits are a threat to the adversarial process. The 65 Project admits that their goal is not just to get Trump’s attorneys disbarred, but to make them so toxic in their firms and in their careers that people will never take on election challenges. For the States United Democracy Center, the mission is the same. To scare people away from taking part in election litigation at all.

That means you can violate election laws with impunity, because no one will be able to make challenges. In Bush v. Gore, Dems filed half a dozen suits down in Florida. No right wing organization ever attempted to disbar them.”

John Eastman knows exactly what the stakes are. That’s why he’s determined to see this challenge through. The hearing is expected to last at least eight days. If the court finds Eastman culpable of the alleged violations it can recommend a punishment such as suspending or revoking his law license. The California Supreme Court makes the final decision.

Donate to John Eastman’s Defense

By Friends of John Eastman

The Thinking Conservative
The Thinking Conservativehttps://www.thethinkingconservative.com/
The goal of THE THINKING CONSERVATIVE is to help us educate ourselves on conservative topics of importance to our freedom and our pursuit of happiness. We do this by sharing conservative opinions on all kinds of subjects, from all types of people, and all kinds of media, in a way that will challenge our perceptions and help us to make educated choices.

Earned vs. Owed

Not since the Donner Party has a group of people so badly misinterpreted the circumstances of their situation like the players of the WNBA.

Just How American are America’s Elite Schools?

Their exteriors may be ivy clad, but that façade on America’s elite universities cloaks secrecy, power politics and globalist attitudes as well.

Multiple Democrats Playing Defense

There is a news situation going on that is...

TOTAL ROT: Consultant Brain and Horserace Politics Have Wrecked Political Discourse

Is feeding at the trough of government graft the goal of politics, or is it the optimal administration of the state? The answer depends on whom you ask.

Media Ignore Trump Successes To Focus On Epstein

Despite President Trump's amazing successes, the media refuse to give credit to the Trump and are continuing to focus on the “Epstein files.”

Declassified Durham Report Annex Sheds New Light on Origins of Russia Probe: Grassley

Sen. Grassley released declassified annex to John Durham’s 2023 report into FBI’s investigation into allegations of Trump campaign–Russia ties.

Appeals Court Hears Arguments Over Whether to Block Trump’s Tariffs

Multiple judges on an appeals court questioned whether a decades-old law Trump invoked had provided him the authority on tariffs he said it did.

State Department Sanctions Palestinian Authority Officials, PLO Members

US State Dept imposed sanctions on Palestinian Authority officials and members of the PLO as U.S. officials arrived in Israel for more cease-fire talks.

Weekly Jobless Claims Remain Near 3-Month Low

According to the Dept of Labor, initial jobless claims rose by 1,000, to 218,000 for the week ended July 26, remaining close to a three-month low.

Bessent Says Trump Accounts for Kids Are Backdoor ‘For Privatizing Social Security’

Treasury Sec Scott Bessent said Trump Accounts are “a back door for privatizing Social Security,” but the admin is committed to protecting Social Security.

Trump Says Canada’s Backing of Palestinian Statehood Threatens US Trade Deal

President Trump said it would be “very hard” to reach a trade agreement with Canada after PM Carney announced plans to recognize a Palestinian state.

Trump Imposes 25 Percent Tariff on India Plus Unspecified Penalty

Trump said US to impose a 25% tariff on Indian goods and unspecified penalties, citing India's high trade barriers and reliance on Russian energy and arms.

White House Launches Health Information Sharing Initiative

Making Health Technology Great Again centers on giving patients full access to their own health records and making the data useful for both doctors and patients in managing disease.
spot_img

Related Articles