Yesterday we posted an article questioning some of the oddities of the Alex Jones civil defamation court cases of the Sandy Hook families in both Connecticut and Texas.
“Was Alex Jones the First Victim of Lawfare?” – The Thinking Conservative
The point of that article was to highlight some of the highly irregular legal proceedings in the way these two judges conducted the cases in their courtrooms. But what if their misapplication of the law was not the only irregularities to be witnessed and investigated?
Last fall a lawyer came forward to question the methodology of the Alex Jones defense team and even Alex Jones himself in the matter of these cases. Attorney R. (Robert) Wyn Young and The Maverick Artist Victor-Hugo came forward on his podcast to ponder; What if the Sandy Hook Legal Team of Alex Jones and the Joe Biden Weaponized DOJ was on a secret mission to curb First (speech) and Second (gun) Amendment rights?
“Alex Jones Sandy Hook Case Bares Weaponized DOJ Controlled Opposition Used To Curb 1st 2nd Amendment” – VictorHugoArt
Some people, such as me, would immediately say Alex Jones would never take part in a socialist or communist conspiracy against Americans who have loyally followed him as fellow patriots for years. But what if he were compromised? Remember this story from 2019?
“InfoWars Host Sent Files With Child Porn in Sandy Hook Suit, Lawyers Say:
Twelve emails containing embedded child pornography were among the more than 56,000 pieces of data handed to attorneys representing the families of the 2012 mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School by right-wing conspiracy theorist and InfoWars host Alex Jones.”
In this very good interview Ohio Attorney Young looks at the trials of Alex Jones and the Sandy Hook families related to perception verses reality. If you have ever seen the internet meme that reads, “The Answer to 1984 is 1776”, Young lays claim to this as one of his submitted to Alex Jones and his Info Wars going back 2022. Today he indicates Alex Jones is guilty of “capitulation and betrayal” for reasons unknown.
At about the 10 minute mark of this 90 minute video Attorney Young gets into the meat of the subject with his argument.
The first point Attorney Young makes is Jones was essentially sued for use of his First Amendment right to free speech. Defamation requires malice and if Jones sincerely believed/believes the Sandy Hook School shooting was a hoax, and that is not malice. Many Americans do not believe Sandy Hook School had a mass shooting that day when a FEMA drill was known to be scheduled at that same time. That does not make them criminals or liable to the Sandy Hook families!
Attorney Young accuses Jones of sandbagging the public in his trials relative to his defense of his cases as they relate to both the First and Second amendments of the Constitution. The other possibility is Jones was misrepresented by his defense attorneys.
On Attorney Young’s own website he offers this explanation complete with slideshow:
“Operation Madcap: Exposing Alex Jones’ Capitulation & Betrayal in the Connecticut Sandy Hook Cases (Video) 11/01/24”
This entire dark episode in American History has Attorney Young exposing what he has termed “Operation Madcap” and this is so serious Attorney Young has released a public statement which he has sent to the Ohio Bar Association as follows in a PDF format on his website.
“Public Statement and Request for Action:
SANDY HOOK: A TWO~PART, TREASONOUS CONSPIRACY TO UNDERMINE OR DESTROY THE FIRST AND SECOND AMENDMENTS”
CONCLUSION:
Alex Jones and his attorneys certainly did not offer the same vigorous defense to his journalistic production company InfoWars I would have wanted. He should have started with removal of the case from the State of Connecticut to Federal Question Jurisdiction (Federal Court due to First Amendment protections) 28 USC § Section 1331.
The conduct of Alex Jones and his defense attorneys in this case could explain why President Donald Trump seemingly may have turned his back on Jones, at least for the moment. President Trump has often said, “I’m big on loyalty,” and that would include loyalty to right over wrong.
Every single person reading this needs to understand the ramifications of this case. A trusted and beloved patriot conservative podcaster of our nation may be in the process of being used as a pawn to undermine both our First and Second Amendment Constitutional rights.
People are often confused as to how the 2A comes up in this case. In 2022, the Sandy Hook families reached a $73 million settlement with Remington firearms and its insurers. This, too, should have never happened. All the proof you need is this:
We have had hundreds of actual American citizens raped, robbed, and murdered by illegal aliens in the last 4 years under the Joe Biden Administration due to his “open border policy”. Why are Joe Biden and his Democrats never held liable in civil suits for such losses?
“Illegal immigrant truck driver accused in deadly Florida crash got Biden work permit after Trump denial: DHS” – Fox News
The fact of the matter is the cause and effect is clearer in this Joe Biden example than the Sandy Hook-Remington firearms example. The simple existence of a gun, an inanimate object, does not lead to murders. The actions of a corrupt president indeed can! We have laws about immigration and invasions and Biden ignored them going so far as to rename “illegal aliens” as “newcomers”!
As I said before, I hope President Trump and Attorney General Pam Bondi inject themselves into these Alex Jones cases. These cases stink and their outcomes are highly suspicious. They are not a simple attack on Alex Jones, they are attacks on our First and Second Amendment Constitutional rights!
© 2025 by Mark S. Schwendau
