First Liberty & Institute for Justice File Supreme Court Petition in Maine School Choice Case

Contact Your Elected Officials
First Liberty

Last week, First Liberty Institute and the Institute for Justice (IJ)โ€”a leading nonprofit law firm in school choice issuesโ€”petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to review an appellate court decision in our Maine School Choice case.

In October of 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit upheld a Maine law that excludes students attending faith-based schools from the stateโ€™s high school tuition program. Under the program, when a town does not maintain its own public high school, the state pays tuition for students to attend the school of their choiceโ€”unless that school is religious.

In our petition, First Liberty and IJ attorneys argue that no state should discriminate against families that choose to send their children to a religious school:

โ€œStates should not be permitted to withhold an otherwise available education benefit simply because a student would make the private and independent choice to use that benefit to procure an education that includes religious instruction.โ€

Letโ€™s quickly recap what this case is about, including what implications the final decision could have for the liberty of students (as well as their parents) to choose which school they attend and whether theyโ€™ll face discrimination for pursuing a faith-based education.

Choose Your Schoolโ€”Unless itโ€™s Religious

Maine has a 200-plus year tradition of using government funds to ensure education for its residents. Historically, some towns would provide for families to send their children to private academies, often run by religious organizations.

In 1903, the state passed a law ensuring that all children would have access to primary and secondary education. But not every community had enough moneyโ€”or studentsโ€”to justify building their own schools.

To this day, when a school district does not provide a public high school, Maine compensates for this by helping fund tuition at any public or private school that families choose, unless it is a religious school. This religious restriction wasnโ€™t always there, though. Throughout most of the programโ€™s history, parents could choose religious schools and still participate in the tuition program.

That changed in the 1980s, when Maineโ€™s Attorney General declared that it was unconstitutional to include religious schools in the program. Later Supreme Court cases clarified that allowing school-choice program participants to select religious educational options did not violate the Establishment Clause. Allowing families to independently choose from an array of schools which may or may not be religious in no way violates the Constitution.

However, Maine did not remove the religious exclusion from its program. Despite previous lawsuits, Maine continued to deny families in โ€œtuitioning townsโ€ the choice to send their child to a religiously affiliated school under the school choice program.

Hope for Victory: What the U.S. Supreme Court Has Already Said

As we wait for the Supreme Courtโ€™s response on our recent petition, thereโ€™s reason to have hope that First Libertyโ€™s and IJโ€™s legal teams can achieve a victory on behalf of the families we represent who are challenging Maineโ€™s religious discrimination.

In fact, the Supreme Court recently issued two decisions favorable to the constitutional rights of students and religious schools.

The first one is Trinity Lutheran v. Comer (2017). Trinity Lutheran Church in Missouri applied in 2012 for a state program that used recycled tires to pad its playgrounds. The church runs a pre-school, but not all the students attended the church. The playground is also open to everyone in the community. Still, the state refused to let the Trinity Lutheran Church improve the safety of its playground via the state program. Why? Because it was religious.

In 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 7-2 that religious organizations such as Trinity Lutheran could participate equally in taxpayer-funded state programs. In fact, by excluding Trinity Lutheran, the state of Missouri was discriminating on the basis of religion and violating the Constitution.

The second ruling is Espinoza v. Montana (2020), which stated that the Free Exercise Clause prohibits the state of Montana from excluding students attending religious schools from participating equally in tax-credit-funded scholarship programs for low-income students.

In light of these precedents, First Liberty and IJ argue not only that the U.S. Supreme Court has given the green light to include religious options in a school choice program, but also that barring parents who choose religious options from participating in school choice programs violates the U.S. Constitutionโ€™s Free Exercise and Equal Protection Clauses.

With the Maine School Choice case, the U.S. Supreme Court has a prime opportunity to reaffirm that in America, families should not be excluded from participating in widely available public benefits only because they choose religious schools for their children.

by Jorge Gomez

Main School Choice Case

The Thinking Conservative
The Thinking Conservativehttps://www.thethinkingconservative.com/
The goal of THE THINKING CONSERVATIVE is to help us educate ourselves on conservative topics of importance to our freedom and our pursuit of happiness. We do this by sharing conservative opinions on all kinds of subjects, from all types of people, and all kinds of media, in a way that will challenge our perceptions and help us to make educated choices.

The Vital Importance of Constitutional Rules

Rules have always been important in the determination of what was, and is, good and right and what is conversely evil and wrong in the course of human society.

Armistice and amnesiaโ€ฏย 

In case you missed it too, June 25thโ€ฏmarked the 75th anniversary of the beginning of the Korean War โ€“ the first hot front of the Cold War.โ€ฏ

Candace Owens Gets Sued by Macrons

Candace Owens began a deep dive into the lives of French President Emmanuel Macron, his wife Brigitte, and the story of how they came to be together.

Fluoride โ€˜Tabletsโ€™ For Babies EXPLODE in Popularity Amid Water Fluoridation Rollbacks

Reportedly, NPCs are so distraught that their toddlers wonโ€™t be fed a neurotoxin through the public water supply that theyโ€™ve resorted to fluoride pills.

ChatGPT Goes Biblical about End Times!

There are some truly outstanding internet content creators, or...

San Francisco Restricts RV Parking in Effort to Combat Homelessness

San Francisco approved two-hour parking limit on oversized vehicles attempting to prevent homeless people from living in RVs and to reclaim public spaces.

What to Know About Cloud Seeding

80-year-old cloud seeding technology is being used to mitigate droughts and increase water supplies across the country.

Education Department Probe Finds 5 Virginia School Districts Violated Title IX

Five school districts in No. VA violated Title IX by allowing students to access โ€œintimate, sex-segregated facilities based on subjective โ€˜gender identity,โ€™โ€

Washington State Sues to Prevent Trump Admin From Accessing Food Aid Immigration Data

Washington state is suing financial services company Fidelity Information Service to prevent it from sharing food aid data with the federal government.

Deputy FBI Director Promises โ€˜Dignified Effort at Truthโ€™ With Ongoing Investigations

FBI Deputy Director said the agency is conducting multiple investigations related to alleged public corruption and weaponization of government.

US Strikes Trade Deal With European Union

After months of negotiation, President Donald Trump said on July 27 that he reached a trade deal with the European Union.

Trump Says Supreme Courtโ€™s Immunity Ruling Likely Helps Obama Following DNI Disclosures

President Trump said Obama likely has immunity following a U.S. Supreme Court ruling in light of a report that was declassified by DNI Tulsi Gabbard.

Ex-DOJ Officials File Lawsuit Against Bondi Over Terminations

Former DOJ officials filed lawsuit against AG Bondi and the fed. govt, saying they were terminated for work on cases related to Jan. 6 Capitol breach.
spot_img

Related Articles