Enough videos have been posted to the internet, plenty of eyewitnesses are coming forward with their accounts, gun experts are speaking out, and gaslighting by authorities makes the official narrative of Charlie Kirk’s assassination looks like a conspiracy. Should Kash Patel and his FBI be on the hot seat?
WARNING: Some of the videos included in this column contain graphic images of the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
One of the videos that is absolutely destroying the FBI narrative stating that Charlie Kirk was shot from a man on a roof 200 yards in front of him with a high power hunting rifle is done by a American Marine that goes by the handle EightPoint03xx. He claims to have been personally shot in combat 3 times and the video features one of those 3 times after he was shot seen smiling.
“Kirk Assassination: New Video Evidence Changes Everything!” – RangeDayBro
The identity of the RangeDayBro channel owner remains unknown according to Google AI.
The identity of this Marine, Eight Point 03XX, who provided the video to RangeDayBro is also kept anonymous and unknown. Google AI offers this about the identity of the source of the Charlie Kirk assassination video:
“The identity of the individual behind the Eight Point 03XX channel is not publicly disclosed. The person is a Marine veteran who started the channel and related merchandise line out of passion and pride for the 6th Marine Regiment and the broader USMC infantry community (Military Occupational Specialty code 03XX).”
His website is found at: https://www.eightpoint03xx.com/
This video from RangeDayBro with content provided by EightPoint03xx has now received almost 2 million views in just a day!
What the video seemingly shows is Kirk was shot by someone from behind, not in front of him. It offers proof of both an entrance wound at the back of his head and a larger exit wound at the front of his neck. Also, the video offers narration from a Marine who has allegedly seen battle action and people shot, including himself, 3 times.
Other notable internet personalities are also calling out the official FBI narrative as rubbish starting with Candice Owens.
“Charlie Kirk Shooting Suspect Charged. Something Isn’t Right… | Candace Ep 236” – Candace Owens
The video above has received almost 6 million views in six days!
Another very interesting video that seems to kick the FBI narrative in the head is from a gun expert.
“Bombshell New Evidence On Charlie Kirk “Entry Wound.” Are We Being Purposely Lied To??” – Heavy Duty Country
Heavy Duty Country is operated by Dan Swick, who began posting videos in 2020, with the first titled “Wake Up America” channel. I really like Swick’s content and style.
CONCLUSION:
Many areas of the official narrative seem to suspect:
- There is no evidence Tyler Robinson was on that UVU building roof with a :30-06 long rifle the day of the Kirk assassination.
- There was no time to take apart and put together said rifle of Robinson’s family within the timeline.
- A :30-06 is a very loud rifle. The shot we heard on video was not from that rifle.
- Charlie Kirk was said not wearing body amour. He was encouraged to before the event (according to Turning Point U.S.A. officials) and he refused.
- The doctor and spokesperson of Turning Point U.S.A. who said a bone of Charlie Kirk blocked the bullet from exiting Kirk’s body seems not just improbable but impossible, that is to say if we are to believe a :30-06 was really the murder weapon.
- The text messages supposedly made between Tyler Robinson and his lover Lance Twiggs seems fake with the objective of clearing Twiggs.
- There has now been conflicting reports the bullet was not found and it was found stopped by a bone of Charlie Kirk. Which is it? Where is the coroner’s report?
Of course there are many other oddities such as the courtyard of UVU getting a total makeover immediately after the Kirk assassination… why would you do that when no bullet had yet to be found?
I am as confused as others who are searching for the truth so as Charlie Kirk always was after “God’s truth”. I was suspicious of the assassination of Charlie Kirk immediately. My first thought was, “How could they have let this happen again? Did they not learn a single thing after Butler, Pennsylvania and Trump?!”
The narrative claims members of the Secret Service were there. If that is true, it is standard operating procedure for them to put their own snipers on rooftops and those rooftops would be those higher than all of the others meaning somebody would have been looking down on the position where Robinson was allegedly lying in wait. They always assume the high ground, first.
Two other issues I had was that the gun used was a :30-06 hunting rifle. If that were true, the noise from that rifle in that enclosed courtyard would have had everybody covering their ears AND, it would have taken Charlie Kirk’s head off! A human head and neck is not tough compared to the large scale wild game that gun is designed to bring down.
As an example; Because of the power and carry distance of that model hunting rifle, we are not allowed to use them to hunt in Illinois, but they are allowed to use them in neighboring Wisconsin.
People are demanding to see the video footage from the video cameras immediately in front of and behind Charlie Kirk. I agree, in a free and open society these videos should be released.
Candace Owens claims to know the man from Turning Point U.S.A. who removed the camera from behind Charlie and she claims to have seen the video footage from that camera. Why was this not considered tampering with a crime scene and evidence?!
I have watched many hours of internet content and read many articles on the Charlie Kirk assassination. I think all of us are driven to find out the truth about his assassination due to our love for Charlie Kirk as a messenger of our Lord Jesus Christ.
The one idea I will offer that I have not read about anywhere and that has laid heavy on my mind was something my father taught me when I was a young boy:
One day he caught me using my grandfather’s bullet molds making wax bullets and immediately got very angry. My child logic was I was not old enough to pour lead without my grandfather or father around but I was allowed to play with candles and wax. His logic was very different. He told me how Chicago mobsters back in his childhood days would use wax paraffin or even ice bullets to avoid police capture as there would be no ballistics evidence thereafter (both disappear in the blood at 98.6 F). He told me what I was doing was actually illegal!
I have yet to hear if either of these conventions could have been used in the Kirk assassination and I cannot stop thinking about it because of that old conversation with my father.
© 2025 by Mark S. Schwendau
