Just How American are America’s Elite Schools?

Contact Your Elected Officials

Their exteriors may be ivy clad, but that façade on America’s elite universities cloaks more than red bricks – secrecy, power politics and globalist attitudes are hidden as well.

President Donald Trump has banned international students from attending Harvard University, citing national security concerns. The move has sparked widespread condemnation from academics and foreign governments, alike. They claim it could damage America’s global influence and reputation for academic openness. At stake, they contend, is not just Harvard’s global appeal, but the premise of open academic exchange that has long defined higher education in the US.

But precisely how “open” is Harvard, especially about its admissions policies? Every year, highly qualified students from the US – many with top-tier SAT or GMAT test scores – are turned away, while foreign students flood into elite institutions. Moreover, students from families in the top 1% financially are more than twice as likely to attend an elite university than those from middle-class families with comparable test scores. Critics argue that behind prestigious brands like the Ivy League lies an opaque system shaped by wealth, legacy preferences, DEI imperatives, geopolitical politics and outright bribes.

George Soros, in a speech at the World Economic Forum, has pledged $1 billion to fund a new university network to counter the spread of populist nationalism as opposed to his vision of a globalist government. Tertiary educational institutions increasingly foster left-wing ideologies that undermine intellectual diversity and create the illusion of a liberal arts education. The philanthropist seeks to open up elite university admissions to his view of “qualified applicants” who would push his left-wing oriented Open Society narrative of globalism.

Soft power politics

China’s swift condemnation of Trump’s policy adds a degree of geopolitical irony to the debate. Why would Beijing feign concern for “America’s international standing” amid a bitter trade war? The domestic standing of US universities has already been tarnished by a “woke psychosis,” which under Biden metastasized to all branches of the federal government.

So, what is behind China’s recent criticism? The answer lies in the unwritten (and unspoken) rules of soft power politics: Ivy League campuses are battlegrounds for influence. The US “deep state” has long recruited foreign students —  subsidized by American taxpayers — to promote its interests abroad. China is playing the same game, leveraging elite US universities to co-opt future leaders on its side of the geopolitical divide.

As of this writing, a federal judge has granted Harvard’s request for a temporary injunction against Trump’s proposed ban. But here’s the thing – there is one common sense solution that certain parties to this saga are keen to avoid:

Schools which accept public funds should open their admissions policies to public scrutiny.

Harvard and other elite institutions are among such recipients. Yet, the same institutions that champion open borders and open society have zero tolerance for being open about their admissions policies. That would open up a Pandora’s Box of awareness surrounding the global subterfuge that is systemically undermining the concept of nation-state sovereignty in the world – fostering instead — the globalist ideas of the WEF.

Concentration of wealth and alumni networks

Ivy League schools (contrary to the modern liberal pablum they espouse) have a vested interest in perpetuating two things: rising wealth and educational inequalities. The reason for this seeming inconsistency? It’s the mechanism through which they remain atop global academic rankings at the expense of less-endowed peer institutions.

Elite universities like Harvard, Princeton, Stanford and MIT dominate lists of institutions with the most ultra-wealthy alumni (net worth exceeding $30 million). Harvard, alone, has 18,000 ultra-high-net-worth (UHNW) alumni, representing 4% of the global UHNW population.

These alumni networks provide mega donations, corporate partnerships and exclusive opportunities —   reinforcing institutional wealth. The logic is simple: If the alma mater’s admissions policy is biased in their favor, it is to their advantage to ante up, at least for the sake of future generations who will perpetuate this exclusivist cycle – in this exclusive club.

The total endowment of Princeton University – $34.1 billion in 2024 – translates to $3.71 million per student, enabling generous financial aid and construction of state-of-the-art facilities. Less endowed institutions cannot compete on this scale.

Rankings, graft, and ominous trends

Global university rankings (QS, THE, etc.) heavily favor institutions with large endowments, high spending rates per student and wealthy student bodies. For example, 70% of the top 50 US News & World Report Best Colleges correlate with universities boasting the largest endowments and the highest percentage of students from the top 1% of wealthy families.

According to the Social Mobility Index (SMI), ascending the rankings requires tens of millions in annual spending and tuition hikes which exacerbate the very thing these institutions claim to abhor – inequality. Lower-ranked schools which prioritize affordability and access are routinely marginalized in traditional rankings which reward wealth over social impact. Social mobility suffers as the global wealth divide not only expands but becomes unbridgeable. To make matters worse, the global ranking system itself thrives on graft, with some institutions being favored and data being inflated.

Yet, government policies increasingly favor elite institutions. Trump’s tax cuts and deregulation will undoubtedly stimulate the economy, but it may also further widen gaps by benefiting corporate-aligned universities while reducing public funding for others. This move was generally welcomed by the Ivy League, at least until Trump took on Harvard.

Nobody seems to be learning from previous contretemps – like “legacy admissions” — staring us in the face. Has ‘learning’ become merely coincidental to the Ivy League – is it just about the power and privilege money and influence can buy?

It seems that technocrats from America’s elite institutions operate as a bureaucratic network, siphoning public and private wealth into elite hands. With regard to the American ethos of merit-based advancement and equal opportunity, what socioeconomic model are these institutions bequeathing to America and its youth?

And before we leave our discussion on secrecy and “openness” – how is this for irony? A star Harvard professor who built her career researching “honesty and ethical behavior” was just fired and stripped of tenure – for fabricating her own data. Do they even teach ethics anymore in the Ivy League?

F. Andrew Wolf, Jr.
F. Andrew Wolf, Jr.
F. Andrew Wolf, Jr. is a retired USAF Lt. Col. and retired university professor of the Humanities, Philosophy of Religion and Philosophy. His education includes a PhD in philosophy from Univ. of Wales, two masters degrees (MTh-Texas Christian Univ.), (MA-Univ. South Africa) and an abiding passion for what is in America's best interest.

A Few Fun Alternatives to the”Gory Stuff” at Halloween

Halloween has gone off the rails with gore through the decades.  But there are ways to enjoy the "scary stuff" without giving into darker, pagan alliances.  

Germany Stands To Lose & Poland To Gain From The EU’s Latest Energy Move

The US is geostrategically re-engineering Europe at Germany’s expense in order to facilitate Russia’s post-Ukraine containment.

EBT Serfs Threaten Violent Mass-Shoplifting Spree if Food Stamps Cut

The EBT serfs of the underclass may be in for a rough ride come November, when mommy government is slated to wean them off the teat of state.

The Real Reason Why the Left is Unhinged

Nine out of thirteen of the original states required you to be a Bible believing Christian to serve in government at the time of the founding.

The Sacrificial Lambs of the Riyadh Standup Scene

Which is the greater injustice: jailing political dissidents, or millions dead from pharma crimes with no accountability for those responsible?

No Shutdown Meeting Until Stopgap Funding Approved, Trump Tells Democrats

Democrats are demanding Republicans renew Affordable Care Act subsidies in exchange for approving the House Appropriations bill.

Texas Appoints Higher Education Ombudsman to Enforce DEI Violations

Texas is moving to enforce bans on DEI practices in universities and potentially restrict college courses focused on gender and race.

House Judiciary Chair Refers Ex-CIA Director John Brennan for Criminal Prosecution

House Republicans referred ex-CIA Director John Brennan to AG Pam Bondi for prosecution over the 2016 probe into alleged Russian–Trump collusion.

FBI Has Arrested 28,000 Violent Criminals Since Jan. 20: Trump

President Trump praised the FBI for doing an “incredible job,” citing thousands of arrests and major disruptions of criminal activity nationwide.

Trump Calls off Meeting With Putin, White House Says

White House says Secretary Rubio and Russia’s Lavrov had a productive call; no further meetings or Trump-Putin talks are planned soon.

President Signs Rare Earth Agreement With Australia’s PM

President Trump hosted Australian PM Albanese at the White House, where both leaders signed a new agreement on rare earth mineral cooperation.

Trump Says Insurrection Act Is ‘Strongest Power a President Has’

President Trump detailed plans to invoke the Insurrection Act to address rampant crime, calling it the “strongest power a president has.”

Army Corps of Engineers to Pause $11 Billion in Projects During Shutdown: Vought

Russ Vought, director of the White House’s OMB, has added to the growing pile of federal projects paused during the government shutdown.
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

MAGA Business Central