Next Week: Supreme Court Will Hear Potentially Landmark Maine School Choice Case

Contact Your Elected Officials
First Liberty Header

High Court will Resolve Whether States May Bar Parents Who Select Schools that Provide Religious Instruction from Participating in Student-Aid Program

Arlington, Virginiaโ€”Next week, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a potentially landmark case challenging a Maine law that bans families from an otherwise generally available student-aid program if they choose to send their children to schools that teach religion. The Institute for Justice (IJ) and First Liberty Institute, which represents the parents in Carson v. Makin, will argue the case at the Court at 10 a.m. EST, December 8. Audio of the argument will be live-streamed at: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx.

Institute for Justice Senior Attorney Michael Bindas, who will argue on behalf of the parents in court, said: โ€œBy singling out religionโ€”and only religionโ€”for exclusion from its tuition assistance program, Maine violates the U.S. Constitution. Religious schools satisfy Maineโ€™s compulsory education laws and meet every secular requirement to participate in the tuition assistance program, yet parents are barred from selecting them simply because they also provide religious instruction. That is religious discrimination, and the Constitution does not tolerate it.โ€

Kelly Shackelford, President, CEO, and Chief Counsel for First Liberty Institute said, โ€œGovernment discriminating against parents because of their religious choices for their children is not only unconstitutional, itโ€™s wrong.  We are hopeful the Supreme Court will put an end to these violations, not only for the sake of the Carsons and the Nelsons, but for the sake of all parents in America.โ€

In 2020, the Institute for Justice won the landmark Supreme Court victory in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue, in which the High Court held that states cannot bar families participating in generally available student-aid programs from selecting religiously affiliated schools for their children. The Court held that discrimination based on the religious โ€œstatus,โ€ or identity, of a school violates the Free Exercise Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

Despite that ruling, in October 2020 the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a religious exclusion in Maineโ€™s tuition assistance program for high school students. Under that program, if a school district does not maintain its own public school or contract with a school to educate its students, it must pay for students to attend the school of their parentsโ€™ choiceโ€”whether public or private, in-state or out-of-state. Parents, however, may not select a school that Maine deems โ€œsectarian,โ€ which the state defines as a school that provides religious instruction.

According to the 1st Circuitโ€™s decision, this exclusion turns not on the religious โ€œstatusโ€ of the excluded schools, but rather on the religious โ€œuseโ€ to which a studentโ€™s aid would be putโ€”that is, procuring an education that includes religious instruction. And the 1st Circuit upheld the exclusion even though it is parentsโ€”not governmentโ€”who choose the schools their children attend under the program. In other words, the court held that although Espinoza prohibits Maine from excluding schools because they are religious, Maine can still exclude parents from choosing schools that do religious things.

Amy Carson, one of the plaintiffs in the case, said: โ€œMaine families deserve the right to choose the education they believe will be best for their children, whether or not the school teaches religious values. Weโ€™re hopeful that the Supreme Court will make a decision that could open the door to better education for families not only in Maine, but across the country.โ€

# # #

About First Liberty Institute

First Liberty Institute is the largest legal organization in the nation dedicated exclusively to defending religious freedom for all Americans.

The Thinking Conservative
The Thinking Conservativehttps://www.thethinkingconservative.com/
The goal of THE THINKING CONSERVATIVE is to help us educate ourselves on conservative topics of importance to our freedom and our pursuit of happiness. We do this by sharing conservative opinions on all kinds of subjects, from all types of people, and all kinds of media, in a way that will challenge our perceptions and help us to make educated choices.

Donald Trumpโ€™s Appointments Are Being Obstructed

Donald Trump is the only President in history that has had recess appointments blocked by his own party!

Trump Flag-Burning Ban: Unconstitutional, Un-American, and Trifling

Trump signed an EO to criminalize the burning of the American flag โ€” the right to do which having already been adjudicated by the highest court in the land.

Using True Facts of History to Determine What is Right and What is Wrong

The amount of time separating a human act from a truthful description of it is not as important as the veracity of historians bringing it to light.

The Very British Stalemate: British Politics Explained for Americans

The assumption in the minds of American commentators, politicians, and analysts is that the UK has "gone to the dogs" with "woke" political ideology.

NFL Vikings Male Cheerleader Controversy ย 

The NFL under the leadership of Roger Goodell is back to yet another controversy that is causing backlash and a possible boycott.

Interior Department Plans to Revoke Permit for $11 Billion Maryland Offshore Wind Farm

The Trump administration is preparing to revoke a Biden-era permit for an $11.5 billion offshore wind farm planned off the coast of Maryland.

Kraft, Coca-Cola Defeat Lawsuit Over Ultra-Processed Foods

Judge dismissed lawsuit against major food and beverage manufacturers, ruling teenager who sued did not meet evidentiary standards for suit to proceed.

Judge Dismisses Trump Admin Lawsuit Against Federal Court in Maryland

Trump admin lost lawsuit against federal court in Maryland that's automatically blocking deportations for illegals who challenged their detention by fed govt.

Federal Appeals Court Says Pennsylvania Ballot Date Requirement Violates Constitution

Pennsylvaniaโ€™s requirement that election officials reject ballots with missing dates violates the U.S. Constitution, a federal appeals court ruled on Aug. 26.

Commerce Secretary Says Pentagon Weighing Equity Stakes in Defense Contractors

DOD is weighing taking equity stakes in defense contractors such as Lockheed Martin and others, Commerce Sec. Howard Lutnick said in an interview.

Hereโ€™s What Major American Retailers Are Saying About Tariff Impacts

American retailers are doing what they can to keep tariffs from affecting consumers, but they acknowledge that eventually something has got to give.

Trump Threatens Tariffs for Nations With Digital Taxes on US Tech

The president said other countriesโ€™ digital taxes and regulations were โ€˜all designed to harm, or discriminate against, American Technology.โ€™

On 4th Anniversary of Afghan Attack, Trump Honors Soldiers Lost in US Withdrawal

President Trump welcomed Gold Star families and issued a proclamation honoring military lives lost during withdrawal from Afghanistan.
spot_img

Related Articles