Pennsylvania Court Strikes Down ‘No-Excuse’ Mail-In Voting Law

The Pennsylvania court struck down the state’s mail-in voting law on Friday and said the Pennsylvania Constitution requires voters to cast their ballots in person unless they meet specific requirements.

“No-excuse mail-in voting makes the exercise of the franchise more convenient and has been used four times in the history of Pennsylvania,” wrote commonwealth court judge Mary Hannah Leavitt (pdf) in an opinion. “Approximately 1.38 million voters have expressed their interest in voting by mail permanently.”

“If presented to the people, a constitutional amendment… is likely to be adopted. But a constitutional amendment must be presented to the people” before measures like Act 77 can take effect, the court wrote Friday. Act 77 was passed in the Pennsylvania Legislature and signed into law in 2019 by Democrat Gov. Tom Wolf.

Three Republican judges opted to strike down the law over the dissent of two Democratic judges.

Democrat Gov. Tom Wolf’s administration will most likely appeal the ruling. A spokesperson for Wolf’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Following the 2020 election, Republicans criticized Pennsylvania court decisions, including one that allowed mail-in ballots to be counted up to three days after the 2020 election so as long as they were postmarked by Election Day.

“Big news out of Pennsylvania, great patriotic spirit is developing at a level that nobody thought possible,” former President Donald Trump said in a statement that celebrated the Pennsylvania ruling on Friday. “Make America Great Again!”

More than 2.6 million Pennsylvanians voted via the mail during the 2020 general election, according to the Pennsylvania elections agency. The figure includes both absentee voting and no-excuse mail-in voting.

In August 2021, 14 Republican members of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives filed a lawsuit against the mail-in voting law, saying it was unconstitutional. Bradford County Commissioner Doug McLinko in September 2021 filed a similar legal challenge before the two suits were consolidated into one.

Later, the Democratic National Committee and the Pennsylvania Democratic Party intervened to defend the law in tandem with Wolf’s administration.

The Democratic National Committee and the Pennsylvania Acting Secretary of State’s office did not immediately issue comments after the court’s ruling on Friday.

On Thursday, meanwhile, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court declined to hear a separate case from Lehigh County Judge candidate Zachary Cohen over undated mail-in ballots. The court upheld a Commonwealth Court ruling that some 257 undated mail-in ballots need to be discarded.

Adam Bonin, Cohen’s lawyer, told the Allentown Morning Call that his client is “disappointed in the court’s ruling, not only because of it’s impact on Zac, but especially for all those voters who deserve to be heard in this election.” Cohen is 74 votes behind Republican David Ritter in the race.

The Thinking Conservative
The Thinking Conservativehttps://www.thethinkingconservative.com/
The goal of THE THINKING CONSERVATIVE is to help us educate ourselves on conservative topics of importance to our freedom and our pursuit of happiness. We do this by sharing conservative opinions on all kinds of subjects, from all types of people, and all kinds of media, in a way that will challenge our perceptions and help us to make educated choices.

Columns

Diddy Trial Exposes Illuminati and Deep State?

There's a correlation between revelations in trial of rapper Diddy for racketeering and sex crimes with male prostitute who shot up the Trump Hotel in Doral.

DHS Weaponizing Aerosolized Ebola in Clandestine Lab, Rand Paul Alleges

Senate Health Committee hearing featuring RFK Jr. unveiled that a DHS lab is working on aerosolized Ebola and studying kidney-wrecking remdesivir as a fix.

All in a name

Cardinal Prevost chose the papal name Leo. Among popes, Leos have historically confronted adversity and division and fought for unity with clarity.

How Legal Immigration Is Keeping Farms Afloat

The H-2A visa program is an example of how legal immigration can supply labor in America, but farmers say reform is needed.

Trump’s EO to Reduce Drug Prices Explained

Trump signed an Executive Order to bring the prices Americans pay for prescription drugs in line with those paid by other nations around the world.

News

Coinbase Customers’ Personal Data Stolen in Hack, Stock Drops

The cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase was recently targeted in a hacking incident that led to the personal data of thousands of customers being stolen.

New Jersey Train Engineers Go on Strike, Halting Service in New York City Area

New Jersey Transit train engineers went on strike on May 16, halting service to 350,000 riders in the New Jersey and New York area.

5 Takeaways From Supreme Court Hearing on Nationwide Injunctions, Birthright Citizenship

Supreme Court heard oral arguments in relation to Trump admin’s request to lift nationwide injunctions placed on president’s birthright citizenship order.

Federal Judge Blocks Trump’s Order to Strip Foreign Service Bargaining Rights

Judge temporarily blocked President Trump’s order stripping foreign service workers of collective bargaining rights, granting a preliminary injunction.

New Era of ‘Supply Shocks’ Could Force Higher Long-Term Interest Rates, Says Powell

A period of supply disruptions may reshape the U.S. economy, leading to unstable inflation and sustained higher interest rates, says Chair Jerome Powell.

FTC Warns StubHub Over Apparent Failure to List Total Price of Tickets

Ahead of the 2025 NFL season, the FTC sent a letter to StubHub calling for strict compliance with the agency’s new Rule on Unfair or Deceptive Fees.

Supreme Court Rules 9–0 That Excessive Force Lawsuit May Proceed Against Police Officer

Supreme Court ruled that the mother of a man killed by police during a traffic stop may pursue a civil rights lawsuit against the officer who shot him.

Supreme Court Wrestles With Nationwide Injunctions in Birthright Citizenship Case

Supreme Court grappled with how far federal judges could go in issuing sweeping blocks on policies such as Trump’s order restricting birthright citizenship.
spot_img

Related Articles