Remarks by President Trump in Press Briefing | 08-08-2020

Trump National Golf Club
Bedminster, New Jersey
4:21 P.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you very much everybody.  Thank you, and good afternoon.  My administration has been working around the clock in good faith to reach an agreement with Democrats on additional China virus relief.

Already, my administration has enacted over $3 trillion in historic relief, saving many tens of millions of dollars and jobs.  And you see how fast the economy is coming back.  It does look like itโ€™s going to be a very sharp โ€œV.โ€  We have tremendous enthusiasm, tremendous spirit, and tremendous job growth.  We set a record on number of jobs in the last three months.  Itโ€™s the most jobs ever created in a three-month period โ€” during a three-month period.  Thatโ€™s great.

Before we begin, Iโ€™ve just signed two bills that are great for our vets.  Our vets are very special.  We passed Choice, as you know โ€” Veterans Choice โ€” and Veterans Accountability.  And theyโ€™ve been trying to get that passed for decades and decades and decades, and no President has ever been able to do it.  And we got it done so veterans have Choice.  And now you have Accountability โ€” that if you donโ€™t love your vets, if youโ€™re in the VA and you donโ€™t love the vets or take care of the vets, you can actually get fired if you donโ€™t do your job.  We want people that love our vets.

The first expands the eligibility for vets with blindness in both eyes.  So we have an expansion of benefits, an expansion of various elements of being and working with the VA for vets with blindness and โ€” in particular, blindness in both eyes.  And we have a lot of problems with blindness in the VA, and weโ€™re doing something about it.  Theyโ€™ve been talking about this for many years.  So that is expanding eligibility for vets with blindness in both eyes.  Okay?

Second is โ€” requires the VA to establish a treatment court program for vets who need treatment rather than punishment for certain nonviolent crimes.  And you know what that all means, and itโ€™s really something that theyโ€™ve been trying to get done for a long time.  The second requires the VA to establish a treatment court.  So this is a treatment court program for vets who need treatment rather than punishment for certain nonviolent crimes.  Okay?  I think itโ€™s self-explanatory.

Weโ€™ve wanted this for a long time, theyโ€™ve been trying to get it for a long time, and now we have it.  And I want to thank everybody for helping us get that done.  We had a lot of support from a lot of great people, including people in the VA.

In the current negotiations, we have repeatedly stated our willingness to immediately sign legislation providing expanded unemployment benefits, protecting Americans from eviction, and providing additional relief payments to families.  Democrats have refused these offers; they want to negotiate.  What they really want is bailout money for states that are run by Democrat governors and mayors, and that have been run very badly for many, many years โ€” and many decades, in fact.  You know the states; everybody knows who weโ€™re talking about and what weโ€™re talking about.  I donโ€™t think we have to go over it.

But what the Democrats primarily want is bailout money.  It has nothing to do with the China virus.  It has nothing to do with anything that weโ€™ve been talking about over the last period of time.  They want to bailout states that have been badly managed by Democrats, badly run by Democrats for many years โ€” and, in fact, in all cases, many decades.  And weโ€™re not willing to do that.

Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer have chosen to hold this vital assistance hostage on behalf of very extreme partisan demands and the radical-left Democrats, and we just canโ€™t do that.  So, hopefully, we can do something with them at a later date, but weโ€™re going to be signing some bills in a little while that are going to be very important, and will take care of, pretty much, this entire situation.

As we know it and as you have been covering it in some cases โ€” actually covering it accurately โ€” many of the far-left policies theyโ€™re pushing have nothing to do, again, with what we have been working on so hard โ€” namely, the corona.  You can call it so many different names.  What a horrible thing China released upon the world.

One third of their bill โ€” the HEROES Act โ€” is spending completely unrelated money to the virus.  Here are just a few of the policies in their extreme-left bill.  And, again, this is a bill supported by Biden, and Biden is totally controlled now by the Bernie Sanders left wing of the party.  And, in fact, heโ€™s gone further left than Bernie Sanders ever dreamt of going.  So, obviously, other than Bernie have brought him left.  If you look at the manifesto that theyโ€™ve agreed to, itโ€™s far further left than Iโ€™ve ever heard anything about Bernie Sanders.

The massive taxpayer bailout of badly run blue states we talked about โ€” thatโ€™s one of the things theyโ€™re looking to do.  Measures designed to increase voter fraud.  Banning voter ID; they want to ban voter ID.  We should have voter ID in every state.  Every state should have voter ID.  You have ID on everything you do, practically, yet every- โ€” everybody has voter ID.  Everybody has ID except for voters.  When you vote, you donโ€™t want ID; they donโ€™t want โ€”

We have some states with it; it works out great.  And if you want to stop fraud in elections, have voter ID.  They want measures designed to increase voter fraud, which is banning voter ID in all states and banning requirements for signature verification in federal elections.

Now, why would they want, in this bill โ€” which really has nothing to do with what weโ€™re talking about: stimulus โ€” something banning voter ID?  In every single state, they want to ban it, including states where we already have it, because we have some states where we have it โ€” Indiana and others that do very well.

Why would they want to ban voter ID in all states?  And why would they want to ban requirements for signature verification in federal election?  Who would want a bill banning signature verification?  Whatโ€™s that all about?

You know what itโ€™s about?  Fraud.  Thatโ€™s what they want: fraud.  They want to try and steal this election because, frankly, itโ€™s the only way they can win the election.

The bill also requires all states to do universal mail-in balloting โ€” which nobody is โ€” nobody is prepared for โ€” regardless of whether or not they have the infrastructure.  They want to steal an election.  Thatโ€™s all this is all about: They want to steal the election.

So, in the bill, they have a bill that requires all states to do universal mail-in balloting, regardless of whether or not they have the infrastructure.  Like in Nevada, itโ€™s such a disaster.  Their infrastructure is a total disaster.  They donโ€™t want to have signature verification, they donโ€™t want to have any of the safeguards that you need, and they donโ€™t want to have safeguards that are so common and so basic and even other states that we disagree with have.  This Nevada thing is a mess, but weโ€™ll see how the courts determine โ€” what the courts determine.  But they certainly donโ€™t have the infrastructure in Nevada.  So weโ€™ll see how it is.

As you know, we brought suit last week, and weโ€™ll see how that all works out.  I think weโ€™re going to win it.  But, basically, what theyโ€™re trying to do with all of these requirements, including no signature verification: Theyโ€™re trying to steal an election.

And I was in Ohio, I was in Texas, I was in Florida over the last four or five days.  And if you would see the crowds along the highways and the roadways, people have said theyโ€™ve never seen anything like it, and they havenโ€™t seen anything like it.  And the press doesnโ€™t report it because theyโ€™re fake news.

They even want to force states to implement the controversial practice known as โ€œballot harvestingโ€ โ€” a very dangerous practice โ€” meaning they would allow Democrat Party operatives to deposit thousands and thousands of completed ballots at the post office without any verification of who filled them out, including a verification of signatures on the ballots.  So youโ€™re not even going to have a verified signature.  Anybody โ€” I could sign it.  You could sign it.  Anybody in this room could sign it.  And thatโ€™s going to count as a vote.  How can you do a thing like this?

So this is what theyโ€™re asking for.  This is what Nancy Pelosi and Crying Chuck Schumer are asking for.

AUDIENCE:  (Laughter.)

THE PRESIDENT:  Okay?  Itโ€™s ridiculous.  Itโ€™s horrible.  Itโ€™s a horrible thing.

The Democrat bill includes stimulus checks for illegal aliens.  So if you were able to get into our country illegally โ€” and our border is, as you know, doing very well right now.  We have a very strong border, and the wall is up to 276 miles.  And weโ€™ll be completed with it around the end of the year.  Weโ€™re going to do some extra mileage in certain areas that people didnโ€™t realize were so bad, so weโ€™ll be completed with it.  Right after, weโ€™re going to do the additional mileage.  Weโ€™ll do it probably a little bit after the year.

I think, from what Iโ€™ve heard, Joe Biden โ€” Sleepy Joe โ€” wants to rip the wall down.  He wants people to pour into our country.  They want to have open borders.  We donโ€™t want to have open borders.

So the Democrat bill includes stimulus checks for illegal aliens.  They require the mass release of illegal aliens from detention.  They also compel the mass release of inmates, including serious felons.  How do you like that one?  And this is in the bill that weโ€™re talking about?  What does this have to do with stimulus, the economy?  What does this have to do with the coronavirus?  Another name.  What does this have to do with this?

So, think of that: They required the mass release of illegal aliens from detention.  What does this have to do with what weโ€™re trying to do?  They want to put this โ€” and this is a radical-left policy, so they can go to Portland and try and rip the place apart that theyโ€™ve been doing for many years and theyโ€™ve been doing for years and years.

They also compel the mass release of inmates.  What does this have to do with what weโ€™re talking about?  This is Nancy Pelosi โ€” Crazy Nancy โ€” and Chuck Schumer.  They want to compel you to do this stuff, and this has nothing to do with what weโ€™re talking about, and it includes serious felons.  They want to have these people released on a mass basis, including serious felons.

Thatโ€™s page 1,689; page 1,762.  Think of it: 1,762.  And thatโ€™s nowhere near the end of their bill.  They have things in there that nobody has even at the time to look at or read.  These people โ€” I donโ€™t โ€” I honestly donโ€™t believe they love our country, you want to know the truth.

In addition to demanding these extreme partisan provisions, Democrats are actively blocking the following measures: support for K-12 schools to help them safely open, additional funding for the Paycheck Protection Program to help millions of workers on the payroll.  This is a great program.  Very successful.  Kept a lot of businesses open.  Thatโ€™s why weโ€™re doing so well in reopening our country.  Additional money for hospitals.  Testing and vaccines.  Direct payments of $3,400 for a family of four.

Now, remember, this is what the extreme partisans โ€” this โ€” we got โ€” we have to โ€” this is what weโ€™re talking about.  Democrats are actively blocking the things that we want.  And what we want is good for people.  Those โ€” these are things that theyโ€™re blocking: support for K-12 schools, so they can open.  Think of that.

Also, direct payments of the $3,400 for a family of four-plus, then funding for childcare and mental health care.  And you need that, especially when you have so much of a lockdown.  You need that: mental health care.

Funding for broadband, airports, and agriculture, rental assistance, and support for community banks and credit unions to help them provide $100 billion in loans to the hardest-hit communities, including rural communities and farmers.  They donโ€™t want anybody to get that.  Democrats are obstructing all of it.

Therefore, Iโ€™m taking executive action.  Weโ€™ve had it.  And weโ€™re going to save American jobs and provide relief to the American workers, and Iโ€™ll be signing these bills in a very short period of time.

First one is on providing a payroll tax holiday to Americans earning less than $100,000 per year.  In a few moments, I will sign a directive, instructing the Treasury Department to allow employers to defer payment of the employee portion of certain payroll taxes from September 1st.  And weโ€™re actually going to be making that; we just got the word.  Weโ€™re just getting some word from a lot of people.  We didnโ€™t think weโ€™d have to do this because we thought the Democrats would be reasonable, but theyโ€™ve been not only unreasonable, theyโ€™ve been ridiculous.

So weโ€™re going to make that August 1st, most likely.  Itโ€™ll be August 1st.  Weโ€™ll let you know the exact date, but weโ€™re looking like August 1st.  So itโ€™d be August 1st through the end of 2020.  This will mean bigger paychecks for working families, as we race to produce a vaccine and eradicate the China virus once and for all.

And weโ€™re doing very good with the numbers.  You see itโ€™s going down in Arizona very, very substantially and rapidly.  Going down in California.  Going down in Texas.  Going down in Florida.  Other areas are propping up a little bit, but weโ€™re watching them very closely.  We understand the disease, and weโ€™re watching them very closely, especially our senior citizens and our senior citizensโ€™ residences.

If Iโ€™m victorious on November 3rd, I plan to forgive these taxes and make permanent cuts to the payroll tax.  So Iโ€™m going to make them all permanent.

Now, Joe Biden and the Democrats may not want that.  They donโ€™t want that because theyโ€™re adding $3 trillion in taxes.  So theyโ€™ll have the option of raising everybodyโ€™s taxes and taking this away.

But if I win, I may extend and terminate.  In other words, Iโ€™ll extend it beyond the end of the year and terminate the tax.  And so, weโ€™ll see what happens.  Biden probably wonโ€™t be doing that; youโ€™ll have to ask him.  I donโ€™t think he knows what heโ€™s doing.

AUDIENCE:  (Laughter and applause.)

THE PRESIDENT:  Second, Iโ€™m signing an executive order directing the Department of Housing and Urban Development, HHS, and CDC to make sure renters and homeowners can stay in their homes.

So Iโ€™m protecting people from eviction.  Yet youโ€™ve been hearing a lot about eviction, and the Democrats donโ€™t want to do anything having to do with protecting people from eviction.  I said, โ€œLetโ€™s do that separately.  That can be a totally separate thing from passing along money so people can live.โ€  And they didnโ€™t even want to protect people from eviction.

So, they would get evicted โ€” itโ€™s not their fault that this virus came into our country; itโ€™s Chinaโ€™s fault.  And came into the world โ€” by the way, a lot of the people, a lot of the states that were doing the best are having some problems.  A lot of the states that we werenโ€™t thinking were doing the best are doing very well.

You look at some of the countries involved.  Some of the countries that were really standing out as examples are now exploding.  But theyโ€™ll get it down; they understand it.  Weโ€™re dealing with them.  Weโ€™re dealing with a lot of countries.

Weโ€™re providing thousands and thousands of ventilators all over the world right now.  We make a lot of ventilators.  We started off with very little, and weโ€™re making a lot.  And we have thousands in our stockpile, but weโ€™re making thousands a month.  And weโ€™re providing many of them โ€” thousands and thousands โ€” to other countries that would never be able to get them.

The Department of Housing and Urban Development will also provide financial assistance to struggling renters and homeowners, and work with landlords and lenders to keep Americans safely in their homes.  So we donโ€™t want people being evicted.  And the bill โ€” the act that Iโ€™m signing will solve that problem, largely โ€” hopefully, completely.

The third action Iโ€™m taking today will also provide additional support for Americans who are unemployed due to the China virus.  Under the CARES Act, I proudly signed expanded unemployment benefits into law.  Congressional Democrats have stonewalled our efforts to extend this relief.  They even oppose measures that would give bonuses to workers returning to the job.  They were totally opposed to that.

For this reason, Iโ€™m taking action to provide an additional or an extra $400 per week in expanded benefits: $400.  Okay?  So, thatโ€™s generous, but we want to take care of our people.  Again, it wasnโ€™t their fault; it was Chinaโ€™s fault.

States will be asked to cover 25 percent of the cost using existing funding, such as the tens of billions of dollars available to them through the Coronavirus Relief Fund.  Under this plan, states will be able to offer greater benefits if they so choose, and the federal government will cover 75 percent of the cost.  So weโ€™re all set up.  Itโ€™s $400 per week.

And weโ€™re doing that without the Democrats.  We should have been able to do it very easily with them, but they want all of these additional things that have nothing to do with helping people.

Fourth, I am signing a directive providing relief to student loan borrowers.  Earlier this year, we slashed student loan interest rates to zero.  I donโ€™t know if people know that because the press doesnโ€™t ever report it, but maybe theyโ€™re watching now.

AUDIENCE:  (Laughter.)

THE PRESIDENT:  The press doesnโ€™t report a lot of good things that are good for the people and good for the country.

Earlier this year, we slashed student loansโ€™ interest rates to zero percent and suspended student loan payments, and Congress extended that policy through September 30th.  Today, Iโ€™m extending this policy through the end of the year, and weโ€™ll extend it further than that โ€” most likely, right after December 1st.  So we look like weโ€™re going to be extending that.  Theyโ€™re paying zero interest.  And again, not their fault that their colleges are closed down and not their fault that theyโ€™re unable to get what they bargained for.

Through these four actions, my administration will provide immediate and vital relief to Americans struggling in this difficult time.  And the beautiful thing about this difficult time is weโ€™re now coming back and setting records.

Weโ€™ll also ensure that our economic comeback continues full speed ahead.  And with the $400 and all of the other measures that weโ€™re talking about and will be signing in a little while, that will happen.

Weโ€™re further looking at additional tax cuts, including income tax relief, income tax cuts, and capital gains tax cuts.  So weโ€™re going to be looking at that โ€” capital gains โ€” for the purpose of creating jobs, and income tax is self-explanatory.  And itโ€™ll be income tax for middle-income and lower-income people, but middle-income people because they pay a lot of income tax and you do have tax inequality.  Iโ€™m saying that as a Republican, and you do have tax inequality.

So weโ€™re going to be looking at income tax, and weโ€™re going to be looking at capital gains tax cuts on both, and maybe substantial.  And weโ€™ll be reporting back fairly shortly on that.  Thatโ€™s big news.  Thatโ€™s big news, but very important.  We want to have our jobs flourish.  We want to have our companies do great.  We want to have the 401(k)s, which are now at a level โ€” if you look at the stock market, itโ€™s great.

If you have stocks in NASDAQ, youโ€™re higher than you ever were, including even โ€” this is still during the pandemic.  The stock market โ€” because they see such incredible things are happening, smart people โ€” the stock market is that almost an all-time high.  Weโ€™re just short of it.  And NASDAQ is higher than it ever was.  Itโ€™s broken the record 14 times in the last couple of months.

So, 401(k)s are doing fantastically.  I hope you kept your stocks.  I hope you didnโ€™t sell.  I hope you had confidence in your President and confidence that the President was going to be reelected.

And I will tell you this, that the biggest tailwind, the biggest problem that we have, with respect to the stock market โ€” which is not much of a problem because itโ€™s doing so well, but it would be actually much higher โ€” is the possibility that these radical-left Democrats could win.  And if they win, weโ€™re going to have a crash.  Weโ€™re going to have a terrible problem because theyโ€™re going to raise taxes โ€” 3 trillion dollarsโ€™ worth of taxes.  And thatโ€™s going to affect everybody from middle-income to upper-income, to jobs, to companies.  Your 401(k)s will go down like a rock.  Your stocks will go down like a rock.

You know, and donโ€™t forget: These big companies โ€” you have stocks in these companies.  You know, you own stocks.  And they have millions and millions of shareholders.  And whether itโ€™s pension funds or anybody else, you all have stocks.  So there are big companies, but a lot of people own that stock, and we want to keep it going.

But we do have, I guess you could say, not a tailwind; itโ€™s a headwind โ€” I guess would be a better description. But it is; itโ€™s a headwind.  And when you think of it, thatโ€™s โ€” in my opinion, it would be much higher.

But you look at what they want to do.  They want to raise everybodyโ€™s taxes โ€” everybody.  And they want to do the Green New Deal, which will decimate our country and decimate โ€” itโ€™s ridiculous, too.  Itโ€™s childish.  I actually say the Green New Deal is childish.  Itโ€™s for children.  Itโ€™s not for adults.

AUDIENCE:  (Laughter.)

THE PRESIDENT:  Anybody that believes in that is โ€” I donโ€™t know, maybe itโ€™s politics.  I donโ€™t even think itโ€™s good politics.  They seem to think so.  Weโ€™ll see how they do.  But I donโ€™t think itโ€™s good politics, and itโ€™ll decimate our economy.

Weโ€™ve learned a great deal about this virus and how to treat it.  Our strategy is to aggressively shield those at the greatest risk while allowing younger and healthier citizens to safely resume work and school.

I noticed that some of the Democrats that I would say are very strongly on the left are now coming out and saying we really have to open our schools for the good of the economy.  I was shocked to see a couple of them โ€” you know they are.

We urge all Americans to socially distance and avoid large crowds and all of the things that we talk about all the time.  We have to โ€” we have to go and make sure that everything is in good shape.  We really are โ€” weโ€™re coming back very, very strong.  Weโ€™re doing very well with the virus because all of those states that everybody thought would be in a bad position for a long time, theyโ€™re all coming down.  Governors have done a great job.
Donโ€™t forget, weโ€™re dealing with governors.  Some have done a fantastic job.  All have worked hard.  Some have done a much better job than others.  And someday, if youโ€™d like to know, Iโ€™ll give you the good ones and the bad ones.  Weโ€™ll give you some good ones and some bad ones.

But, by contrast, the never-ending lockdown being proposed by some, mostly โ€” I guess you could almost say โ€œalmost allโ€ โ€” in the Democrat Party, would inflict unimaginable harm to our people and to our health for decades to come.  Itโ€™ll hurt our economy, and they view that as a good thing.  They actually view that as a good thing because theyโ€™re interested in one date: November 3rd.

And I actually think itโ€™s bad politics, and I think theyโ€™re starting to come along because Iโ€™m seeing more and more people want to open up.  And you see the devastating results of lockdowns, too.  You know, you have depression and suicide and drugs and alcohol and bad marriages.  Marriages that were very good turned out to be very bad.

AUDIENCE:  (Laughter.)

THE PRESIDENT:  Itโ€™s an amazing thing, and itโ€™s โ€” who would think it?  But people get along for 20 years; I guess they didnโ€™t know each other very well, and now theyโ€™re not getting along.

AUDIENCE:  (Laughter.)

THE PRESIDENT:  And you had the opposite, also.  Youโ€™ve had people to get along better.  They like each other more than they thought.  Thatโ€™s okay, too.

AUDIENCE:  (Laughter.)

THE PRESIDENT:  That, we like.  But the other situation is very, very โ€” very, very bad.

Weโ€™ll develop a vaccine.  Weโ€™re going to have it very soon, and weโ€™re ready to distribute it.  And weโ€™re โ€” weโ€™ve got the military ready.  โ€œLogistics,โ€ itโ€™s called.  And weโ€™ll end this pandemic, and we will rebuild the greatest economy in the history of the world.

You know, we created the greatest economy in the history of the world โ€” the highest stock market ever.  And weโ€™re very close to getting that back.  That, I have to say, is way ahead of schedule.  Highest stock market ever.  Best employment numbers for African Americans, Asian Americans, Hispanic Americans.

And, by the way, Hispanic Americans just set a record for new jobs.  African Americans just set a record for new jobs just now โ€” during the pandemic, the last month.  And Asian Americans just set a record for new jobs.  So weโ€™re very proud of whatโ€™s happening.

And I will now sign the executive action.  And then, if you want, we can ask a few questions.

Okay, Kelly.  Yeah, let me do this first, and then you can do some questions.  Thank you very much.

AUDIENCE:  (Applause.)

THE PRESIDENT:  Okay, so this is for the authorization of  other needs assistance program, major disasters declaration related to the coronavirus disease.

(The memorandum is signed.)

Okay?  So this โ€” authority invested in me โ€” this is the payment relief during the COVID-19 pandemic.

(The memorandum is signed.)

This is fighting the spread of the COVID-19 by providing assistance to renters and homeowners.  Weโ€™re doing assistance.

(The executive order are signed.)

And this is deferral payroll tax obligations.  So this is your payroll tax obligations, which weโ€™re going to end up terminating eventually, right?

(The memorandum is signed.)

How many โ€” how many pictures can you take over there?

AUDIENCE:  (Laughter.)

THE PRESIDENT:  I mean, youโ€™re taking hundreds of pictures.  What are you doing?

Okay.

Q    Can you get at the microphone, sir?

THE PRESIDENT:  I will.  I will.

So, thatโ€™s the story.  Would anybody like a pen?  Would anybody like a pen?  Would anybody โ€”

AUDIENCE MEMBER:  I do!

THE PRESIDENT:  Why do we hand these โ€” weโ€™ll hand these out to you in the back.  Okay, fine.

AUDIENCE:  (Applause.)

Q    Mr. President โ€”

THE PRESIDENT:  Yes, please.

Q    Yes, sir.  Can we start with the $400, sir?  So I just wanted to get your reaction.  So youโ€™re saying the states will have to cover some of the costs, sir.  Which governors have told you that โ€” which governors have told you that they would sign onto it?

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, if they donโ€™t, they donโ€™t.  Thatโ€™s up to them.  But if they donโ€™t, they donโ€™t.  Thatโ€™s going to be their problem.  I donโ€™t think their people will be too happy.  They have the money.  So I donโ€™t think their people will be too happy.  But if they donโ€™t, they donโ€™t.

But again, the states have the money.  Itโ€™s sitting there.

All right.  Kelly.

Q    Sir, why did you decide on $400, when previously families were receiving $600?

THE PRESIDENT:  Yeah.

Q    That will be a hardship for many.  What do you say to them?

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, no, itโ€™s not a hardship.  This is the money that they need, this is the money they want, and this gives them a great incentive to go back to work.

So, this was much more than was originally agreed.  The 600 was a number that was there.  And as you know, they were diff- โ€” there was difficulty with the 600 number because it really was a disincentive.

Yeah.  Go ahead, please.

Q    Sir, the payroll tax cut was opposed by both parties on Capitol Hill.  Can you give your rationale as to why you think thatโ€™s important, particularly since it doesnโ€™t help Americans who (inaudible)?

THE PRESIDENT:  Yeah.  Okay.  It helps people greatly.  It helps our country get back.  And anybody that would say anything different, I think, is very foolish.  Everybody wanted it.  By the way, the Democrats want it.  The Republicans want it.  They just couldnโ€™t get it โ€” they just couldnโ€™t come to an agreement, but everybody wants it.

And the very important thing is the people want it, and the people need it, actually.

Q    Mr. President โ€”

THE PRESIDENT:  Yeah.  Yes.

Q    Mr. President, you said that this will pretty much take care of the entire situation.  But, as you said, thereโ€™s not money for reopening schools, other important items.  Is your administration willing to go back to Democrats to try to actually negotiate some of these big things?

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, the answer is yes, but we have money to do other things, and we have a lot of money that was unspent, and weโ€™ll be able to do things with the money that was unspent.  We have significant money that was unspent, and we will be able to use that for different purposes.

Go ahead.

Q    Mr. President โ€”

THE PRESIDENT:  Go ahead.

Q    Mr. President, when will this relief get in the hands of Americans that need it?  What date?

THE PRESIDENT:  We think itโ€™s going to be very rapid.  We want it to be very rapid.  Itโ€™s going to be distributed in a way that โ€” whichever the fastest way.  There are various methods, and it will be rapidly distributed.

Q    But you said youโ€™re also expecting legal challenges with this, right?  So why โ€”

THE PRESIDENT:  I didnโ€™t say that.  No, no.  I didnโ€™t say that.

Q    Yes, you did.  Yesterday, sir, you said that you were expecting legal hurdles โ€”

THE PRESIDENT:  I โ€” I said I โ€” what I said is people can do whatever they want.  I guess maybe theyโ€™ll bring legal actions; maybe they wonโ€™t, but they wonโ€™t win.  They wonโ€™t win.

Q    But if legal action is brought against you on this, why not just work with Congress on this deal?

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, Iโ€™m not saying theyโ€™re not going to come back and negotiate.  They might very well come back and negotiate.

Q    But youโ€™re signing the executive order today, and Americans want to know when theyโ€™re going to see this relief.  What date will they see it?

THE PRESIDENT:  Very soon.  Theyโ€™re going to see it very soon.  Look, itโ€™s โ€”

Q    Very soon?

THE PRESIDENT:  There it is.  Right there.

Q    Thirty million Americans are out of work, sir.

THE PRESIDENT:  Excuse me.  Excuse me.  There it is, right there.

Go ahead.

Q    Mr. President, though, this is expected to be tied up in the court.  So this relief is either going to be delayed or blocked indefinitely.

THE PRESIDENT:  Oh, I donโ€™t think so.

Q    Is this just political theater?

THE PRESIDENT:  I think this is going to go very rapidly through the courts.

Q    But are you giving people false hope?

THE PRESIDENT:  This will go very โ€” if โ€” if we get sued.  Maybe we wonโ€™t get sued.  If we get sued, itโ€™s somebody that doesnโ€™t want people to get money.  Okay?  And thatโ€™s not going to be a very popular thing.

Q    But should a President be able to go around Congress?  Are you trying to set a new precedent โ€”

THE PRESIDENT:  No.  No.

Q    โ€” that the President can go around Congress and decide how money is collected and spent?

THE PRESIDENT:  You ever hear the word โ€œobstructionโ€?

Q    Yes.  You were investigated for that.

THE PRESIDENT:  Theyโ€™ve obstructed.  Congress has obstructed.  The Democrats have obstructed people from getting desperately needed money.

Q    But this is in the Constitution, Mr. President.

THE PRESIDENT:  Go ahead, please.  Right here.

Q    Mr. President, sir โ€”

Q    Why do you keep saying that you passed Veterans โ€”

THE PRESIDENT:  No, no.  Youโ€™re finished.

Go ahead, please.  Please.

AUDIENCE:  (Applause.)

THE PRESIDENT:  Go ahead.

Q    (Inaudible) Veterans Choice?  It was passed in 2014.

THE PRESIDENT:  Okay, excuse me.

Go ahead, please.

Q    But itโ€™s a false statement, sir.

THE PRESIDENT:  Okay, thank you very much everybody.  Thank you very much.

AUDIENCE:  (Applause.)END             4:53 P.M. EDT

The Thinking Conservative
The Thinking Conservativehttps://www.thethinkingconservative.com/
The goal of THE THINKING CONSERVATIVE is to help us educate ourselves on conservative topics of importance to our freedom and our pursuit of happiness. We do this by sharing conservative opinions on all kinds of subjects, from all types of people, and all kinds of media, in a way that will challenge our perceptions and help us to make educated choices.

Columns

Was Pope Francis the Worst Pope Ever?

It has been said the recently passed 266th Pope...

LGBTQโ„ข Roundup: Groomers Gone Wild, Pt. II

Trans activist gets triggered by BBC reporter telling him he can't use womenโ€™s toilets, according to UK Supreme Court ruling on the legal definition of women.

In Trade War, Chinaโ€™s Chokehold on US Medicine Moves Into Spotlight

Chinaโ€™s iron grip on supply of critical drug ingredients has been years in the making, driven by Beijingโ€™s strategic plan to dominate the pharma industry

College Footballโ€™s Spring rite

The Blue-White game, with the antiquated press box and a large section of the west stands now history and under renovation, marches on, but for how long?

Everything We Know About El Salvador Deportee Abrego Garcia

For more than five years, Kilmar Abrego Garcia was an adjudged illegal immigrant living on borrowed time in the United States.

News

New Mexico Supreme Court Bans Former Judge From Exercising Judicial Authority

NM Supreme Court barred former judge from exercising judicial authority in future amid reports alleged TdA gang member was arrested living on his property.

Trump Admin Asks Supreme Court to Allow Prohibition on Troops With Gender Dysphoria

Trump admin is asking Supreme Court to halt federal judgeโ€™s order preventing it from implementing policy disqualifying individuals with gender dysphoria.

DHS and Country Star John Rich Team Up for Urgent Livestream about Protecting Kids from Online Predators

Know2Protect hosted a livestream featuring DHS Special Agent Dennis Fetting and country music star John Rich on protecting children from online predators.

US Manufacturing Shows Signs of Improvement as Factory Output, Orders Tick Higher

U.S. manufacturing showed modest but meaningful improvement in April, according to data by S&P Global, which showed factory output and orders ticking higher.

Trump Admin Sued by a Dozen States in US Trade Court Over Tariffs

A dozen states on April 23 filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration in the U.S. Court of International Trade over its recently announced tariffs.

Supreme Court Seems Inclined to Let Energy Companies Sue California Over Emissions Rules

Supreme Court seemed inclined during oral argument to revive a lawsuit filed by energy companies over Californiaโ€™s tough vehicle emissions standards.

FBI: Losses From Internet Crime Surged 33 Percent in 2024, Topping $16 Billion

Internet-enabled crime cost victims in the U.S. more than $16.6 billion in 2024, a record-breaking 33% increase over previous year, according to FBI report.

Fedโ€™s Kugler: No Rate Cuts in Sight as Inflation, Tariffs Fuel Uncertainty

Federal Reserve Gov. Adriana Kugler said she supports holding interest rates steady due to ongoing inflation risks and new tariffs
spot_img

Related Articles