Supreme Court Rules States Can’t Challenge Biden Deportation Policy

5Mind. The Meme Platform
The Epoch Times Header

The Supreme Court ruled 8–1 on June 23 that Texas and Louisiana may not challenge the Biden administration’s 2021 decision to focus its deportation efforts on individuals deemed to be a threat to public safety.

The new, complex decision allows the government’s selective immigration enforcement policy, which had been blocked by a lower court, to take effect.

The case was one in a series brought by Republican-controlled states that have helped to frustrate Biden administration policies related to immigration and border security.

The Homeland Security Memo

Texas and Louisiana sued the Biden administration over a policy announced in a Sept. 30, 2021, memorandum (pdf) by Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas that claims it is impossible to remove the estimated 11 million illegal aliens present in the United States. Mayorkas has been heavily criticized by Republicans for his allegedly lax approach to immigration enforcement. Some Republicans in Congress want to impeach him for dereliction of duty.

“We do not have the resources to apprehend and seek the removal of every one of these noncitizens. Therefore, we need to exercise our discretion and determine whom to prioritize for immigration enforcement action,” the memo states.

The document prioritizes the arrest and deportation of suspected terrorists, people who have committed crimes, and illegal aliens recently apprehended at the border.

The memo praises the “majority of undocumented noncitizens who could be subject to removal [even though they] have been contributing members of our communities for years.”

“They include individuals who work on the frontlines in the battle against COVID, lead our congregations of faith, teach our children, do back-breaking farm work to help deliver food to our table, and contribute in many other meaningful ways,” it states.

But the states argued that the federal government is illegally refusing to enforce the nation’s immigration laws by prioritizing only certain enforcement categories at the expense of others. They said that the federal Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) requires that specific criminal aliens, such as aggravated felons, must be detained upon release from criminal custody pending a decision on whether to remove them from the country. The law also requires that aliens subject to final orders of removal must be detained pending their removal, they said.

By Matthew Vadum

Read Full Article on TheEpochTimes.com

Contact Your Elected Officials
The Epoch Times
The Epoch Timeshttps://www.theepochtimes.com/
Tired of biased news? The Epoch Times is truthful, factual news that other media outlets don't report. No spin. No agenda. Just honest journalism like it used to be.

Are Epstein’s Worst Sins Being Confirmed?

WARNING: THIS ARTICLE HAS DISTURBING CONTENT OF A SENSITIVE...

Sadly, Minnesota has become a battleground, once again

Minnesota is again a battleground. Five years after George Floyd protests, demonstrators now target ICE agents enforcing the law.

Stolen Land or Stolen Context?: What We Are No Longer Teaching Our Children

To assess whether “stolen land” is accurate, we must examine how U.S. land was acquired — historically, not emotionally or rhetorically.

Repeal the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act: The Original Petition

In 1986, Congress granted vaccine makers unique legal protections, shielding them from most lawsuits over injuries caused by vaccines.

Bad Bunny’s Legal Troubles Coming

The NFL and NBC’s “Big Game” halftime show featuring Bad Bunny has ignited controversy, unleashing a wave of backlash and unexpected fallout for all involved.

Tom Homan Announces End to Immigration Enforcement Surge in Minnesota

Tom Homan said that the administration has made significant progress in Minnesota and will therefore conclude the immigration enforcement surge in the state.

DOJ Asks Prosecutors to Flag ‘Rogue’ Judges for Impeachment

The DOJ asked federal prosecutors nationwide to identify examples of what it calls “judicial activism” for possible impeachment referrals to Congress.

Kraft Heinz Pauses Split as New CEO Says Packaged Foods Giant Is ‘Fixable’

Kraft Heinz is pausing plans to split into two companies as new CEO Steve Cahillane says its problems are “fixable and within our control.”

Marxist Network Under Scrutiny as Lawmakers Probe Chinese Influence

Lawmakers scrutinized a Marxist-aligned network with ties to a pro-Beijing millionaire over potential Chinese Communist connections.

Trump Warns Republicans Will ‘Suffer the Consequences’ If They Vote Against Tariffs

President Trump warned GOP lawmakers they’ll face consequences if they oppose his tariff agenda after some sided with Democrats on a measure.

Trump Orders Military to Purchase Electricity From Coal-Fueled Power Plants

President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Feb. 11 directing the U.S. military to purchase its power from coal-fired electricity plants.

Trump Says Meeting With Netanyahu Yields No Definitive Agreement on Iran

President Trump hosted Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House on Feb. 11 amid ongoing tensions with Iran over its nuclear program.

Why Canada’s China Pivot Makes US Tariff Relief Harder

Analysts say Ottawa’s Beijing outreach is raising new security and trade concerns in Washington—making U.S. tariff relief even harder to secure.
spot_img

Related Articles