The Case for Impeaching Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas

The Heritage Foundation Header

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  1. The crisis that has unfolded over the past two years on our southwest border has had far-reaching and deadly consequences.
  2. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has even stated that DHS cannot mass parole immigrants into the country, but Mayorkas has expanded the practice.
  3. Mayorkasโ€™s actions have directly contributed to a historic border crisis, the consequences of which continue to affect every city and state in the country.

The crisis that has unfolded over the past two years on our southwest border has had far-reaching and deadly consequences.

Regardless of oneโ€™s opinions about illegal immigration or immigration reform, we should all agree that the suffering and devastation it has caused, for Americans and migrants alike, demands accountability.

Through the power of impeachment, the Constitution provides it.

Previous generations have typically refrained from wielding that power in all but the most egregious cases. Sadly, the actions of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas demand that Congress take this rare step.

Impeachment was not designed to settle political scores or policy differences. It is reserved for holding public officials accountable when they violate the law, abuse the power of their office or are dishonest with the American people or Congress.

Our colleagues at The Heritage Foundation recently laid outย a clear and compelling legal caseย for Mayorkasโ€™s impeachment along these lines.

First, he has deliberately defied many of the laws he is supposed to execute.

For example, Mayorkas has violated numerous provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), which governs much of U.S. immigration law. He has instructed Department of Homeland Security (DHS) officials to mass-parole illegal immigrants into the country, in violation of the statute that dictates parole is to be granted โ€œtemporarilyโ€ and โ€œonly on a case-by-case basis for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit.โ€

Theย Fifth Circuit Court of Appealsย has even stated that DHS cannot mass parole immigrants into the country, but Mayorkas has expanded the practice.

DHSโ€™s newest parole program alone will admit as many as 360,000 Haitians, Cubans, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans per year, clearly violating the statute. The most significant effect of these parole policies has been the mass release of individuals into the country who would otherwise have no legitimate claim to enter.

This has encouraged widespread abuse of the asylum system, which has been a driving force behind the crisis, incentivizing millions of individuals to make the journey in hopes of filing a claim and gaining release into the U.S. All this despite data showing that around 90 percent of those claiming asylum do not get relief.

Mayorkas has further defied duly passed laws by restricting Immigration and Customs Enforcement from deporting individuals in the U.S. illegally. His own guidance even dictates that an individualโ€™s presence in the country illegally โ€œshould not alone be the basis of an enforcement action against them.โ€

Second, Mayorkas has abused the power of his office. Through his unlawful policies, he has encouraged millions of individuals to cross the border illegally, most of whom place themselves in the vicious hands of the drug cartels to do so.

He has made clear that anyone who makes a โ€œcredible fearโ€ asylum claim, legitimate or not, will be released into the U.S., knowingly encouraging and facilitating widespread asylum fraud. Mayorkas is a veteran DHS official who knows the data on these claims and yet continues to look the other way, allowing the system to be exploited.

And he has authorized the use of taxpayer funds to transport illegal immigrants throughout the country, often under the cover of darkness, effectively completing the cartelsโ€™ work by ferrying individuals from the border to their final destination.

Third, he has repeatedly lied about his policies and their consequences. In March 2021,ย he told Fox News, โ€œThe border is secure, the border is closed.โ€ In July 2022, he told the Aspen Security Forum, โ€œLook, the border is secure.โ€ On Nov. 15, 2022, he told the House Homeland Security Committee the same thing.

He has even told Congress that DHS maintains โ€œoperational control of the border.โ€

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) hasย recordedย more than 5.5 million encounters since Joe Biden took office. Another 1.2 million โ€œgot-awaysโ€ have evaded Border Patrol altogether and are now at large in the U.S. Among them are violent criminals, including murders, pedophiles, gang members and drug dealers. Fentanyl is now theย leading cause of deathย for Americans 18-45.

As Border Patrol agents are pulled off the line to process the historic flows of illegal immigrants, large areas of our nationโ€™s borders are increasingly vulnerable for the cartels to exploit. CBP has recovered more than 1,500 dead migrants on U.S. soil on Bidenโ€™s watch, another ghastly record.

No objective person would continue to claim the border is secure. DHS does not have operational control. Mayorkas knows this.

Finally, he has knowingly misled the public about the conduct of his own agents who were falsely accused of โ€œwhippingโ€ Haitian migrants in Del Rio, Texas.

Mayorkasโ€™s actions have directly contributed to a historic border crisis, the consequences of which continue to affect every city and state in the country.

His โ€œhigh crimes and misdemeanorsโ€ are โ€œacts committed by public officials, using their power or privileges, that inflicted grave harm on our political order.โ€ Thatโ€™s the definition from the House Judiciary Committeeโ€™s 2019 impeachment of former President Trump. That standard certainly applies today.

The case is compelling. The Constitution provides the means. Our public conscience demands accountability.

By Mark Morgan and Tom Homan

Read Original Article on Heritage.org

The Heritage Foundation
The Heritage Foundationhttps://www.heritage.org/
The Heritage Foundation formulates and promotes public policies based on free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional values, and strong national defense.

Columns

How Legal Immigration Is Keeping Farms Afloat

The H-2A visa program is an example of how legal immigration can supply labor in America, but farmers say reform is needed.

Trumpโ€™s EO to Reduce Drug Prices Explained

Trump signed an Executive Order to bring the prices Americans pay for prescription drugs in line with those paid by other nations around the world.

Parents of Autistic Children Weigh In on RFK Jr.โ€™s Plan to Find the Cause

โ€˜The bottom line is we want the truth. We want safe products for our kids,โ€™ said an Ohio dad with an autistic child.

Fighting the Idiocracy

Despite our country's noble efforts to defend freedom and liberty across the globe we now find ourselves defending democracy against idiocracy.

Recent Sun Activity Could Trigger Major Earthquakes

A number of scientists around the world are sharing concerns about an imminent global seismic event.

News

5 Takeaways From Supreme Court Hearing on Nationwide Injunctions, Birthright Citizenship

Supreme Court heard oral arguments in relation to Trump adminโ€™s request to lift nationwide injunctions placed on presidentโ€™s birthright citizenship order.

Federal Judge Blocks Trumpโ€™s Order to Strip Foreign Service Bargaining Rights

Judge temporarily blocked President Trumpโ€™s order stripping foreign service workers of collective bargaining rights, granting a preliminary injunction.

New Era of โ€˜Supply Shocksโ€™ Could Force Higher Long-Term Interest Rates, Says Powell

A period of supply disruptions may reshape the U.S. economy, leading to unstable inflation and sustained higher interest rates, says Chair Jerome Powell.

FTC Warns StubHub Over Apparent Failure to List Total Price of Tickets

Ahead of the 2025 NFL season, the FTC sent a letter to StubHub calling for strict compliance with the agencyโ€™s new Rule on Unfair or Deceptive Fees.

Supreme Court Rules 9โ€“0 That Excessive Force Lawsuit May Proceed Against Police Officer

Supreme Court ruled that the mother of a man killed by police during a traffic stop may pursue a civil rights lawsuit against the officer who shot him.

Supreme Court Wrestles With Nationwide Injunctions in Birthright Citizenship Case

Supreme Court grappled with how far federal judges could go in issuing sweeping blocks on policies such as Trumpโ€™s order restricting birthright citizenship.

Lawsuit Alleges Musk, Election PAC Failed to Pay Swing State Petition Signers

Lawsuit filed against Musk and his PAC accuses them of failing to pay registered voters in swing states for signing petition supporting candidate Trump.

Trump Weighs In on Supreme Court Case Involving Birthright Citizenship

President Trump weighed in on the U.S. Supreme Court hearing arguments in a case involving his order to limit birthright citizenship.
spot_img

Related Articles