Trade Negotiations Aren’t Chess, Poker, or Go. They’re Bridge.

Trade negotiations are often mischaracterized as adversarial contests akin to warfare or chess. (The latter is increasingly invoked in varying degrees: 3d, 4d, and nth degree). Headlines speak of countries “battling” over tariffs or “outmaneuvering” each other in the global marketplace. But while those analogies may be emotionally satisfying and undergird ideological fervor, they fundamentally misunderstand and distort the nature of trade itself.

Unlike war, trade is not about conquest; it’s about cooperation under constraints. While no analogies are perfect, within the gaming milieu, a better model is to be found in contract bridge, where strategy, communication, and shared outcomes dominate the pursuit of mutual gain.

First and foremost, trade does not inherently require government interference. In its most natural form, trade arises spontaneously—sua sponte—as individuals, firms, and even nations engage in voluntary exchange to pursue their own interests, each party judging for itself whether a given transaction is mutually beneficial. The complexity and strategic posturing captured in-game analogies only enters the picture when states either seize the authority to control trade from private actors or when a population willingly delegates that authority to a political entity. It is in this shift—from decentralized decision-making to centralized negotiation—that trade becomes the province of diplomats, regulators, and strategists, subject to tariffs, quotas, and geopolitical calculation rather than pure market coordination. Once trade becomes a matter of policy rather than private action, the dynamics necessarily change—requiring negotiation, coordination, and a high tolerance for ambiguity.

Bridge, like trade, requires signaling, risk management, and long-term thinking. Played in partnerships, success in bridge is only achievable when players work together to interpret incomplete information, anticipate reactions, and align their strategies toward a common objective. No matter how skilled one player is, they cannot win alone. In trade negotiations, simply trying to extract concessions by brute force is likely to fail, either immediately or in time. Agreements must be structured to hold, function, and deliver net benefits to both sides. Even in a zero-sum context on specific issues (like market access or rules of origin), the broader objective is always positive-sum: increase the flow of goods, reduce frictions, and enhance economic welfare broadly.

That stands in contrast to the chess or poker metaphors often used. Chess is zero-sum and strictly competitive; a gain for one side is necessarily a loss for the other. There is no scope for joint benefit and no reason to cooperate. That model may describe military conflict or geopolitical jockeying, but it fundamentally misunderstands trade negotiations, where voluntary exchange and mutual advantage are foundational principles. Contract bridge also captures the asymmetry and complexity of trade negotiations. Optimally, countries enter trade talks not to dominate but to discover overlapping interests and convert them into stable, enforceable agreements.

By Peter C. Earle and Subiksha Ramakrishnan

Read Full Article on TheEpochTimes.com

The Epoch Times
The Epoch Timeshttps://www.theepochtimes.com/
Tired of biased news? The Epoch Times is truthful, factual news that other media outlets don't report. No spin. No agenda. Just honest journalism like it used to be.

The Looming Threat To Our Homeland

After success of “Operation Midnight Hammer,” where U.S. military bombed Iranian nuclear facilities, the threat to America has never been greater.

Groundhog Day came late this year to the Land of Smiles.

it’s the same rigmarole, on whatever pretext, the army commandeers the Thai state with vague promises to restore democracy at some unspecified future date.

Resource number one

Russia has an unsustainable birthrate worsened by mortality rate of Russian males through war and alcoholism. One solution, steal young children from other countries. 

Expansionist CCP Runs Amok in Pacific After U.S. Relocates Naval Assets to Mid-East

Caveat established, China’s been going bananas on the high seas as the eyes of the world, and U.S. military assets, hone in on Iran.

The Anti-Trump Protests – Why Are They So Important?

The anti-Trump stance is not a political position, but a desperate gesture, a mental diagnosis of those who refuse to accept the reality of the World today.

US Manufacturing Output, Hiring Rise to Multi-Month Highs

U.S. manufacturing activity climbed in June, fueled by strong domestic demand and tariff-driven stockpiling, according to report from S&P Global.

Pakistan Nominates Trump for Nobel Peace Prize

Pakistan nominated Trump for Nobel Peace Prize, calling him a “genuine peacemaker” for helping avert a major confrontation between India and Pakistan.

Mawson study using Florida Medicaid data again confirms childhood vaccines are likely responsible for nearly 80% of the autism cases in US

Mawson study using Florida Medicaid data again confirms childhood vaccines are likely responsible for nearly 80% of the autism cases in US.

Abbott Signs Bill Into Law Requiring Ten Commandments in Public School Classrooms

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott announced he signed a bill into law, that would require all public school classrooms in his state to display the Ten Commandments.

No Changes Planned for FDA’s Vaccine Advisory Committee ‘At This Time’: Spokesperson

There are no plans to remove any members of the panel that advises the FDA on vaccines, a spokesperson said on June 20.

Trump Says Trade Deals Expected With India and Pakistan

President Trump expects US will sign trade deals with India and Pakistan, signaling growing momentum in push to reshape global trade through tariff diplomacy.

Trump Says US Intelligence Community’s Assessment of Iran’s Nuclear Program ‘Was Wrong’

President Trump said his director of national intelligence’s assessment in March that Iran had yet to decide on building a nuclear weapon was wrong.

NIH Ends Gain-of-Function Research, Implementing Trump’s Executive Order

The NIH announced the end of gain-of-function research. The institute’s update said the move is in compliance with President Trump’s EO on the topic. 
spot_img

Related Articles