Why The United States Needs The Filibuster

The Federalist Header

At both the federal and the state level, the legislative process is glorified negotiation. The parties are always preoccupied with two things: advancing their agenda, then mirroring their platform just enough so their base reelects them.

Some legislation doesnโ€™t need much negotiating, like the budget โ€” since Congress just likes spending money. But the proposed laws that we see combated on television are not simple negotiations. Theyโ€™re hyper-politically charged and thoroughly discussed in the House. The hottest debates happen in the Senate, however, where the vast majority of bills go to die. These dead bills owe their short lives to one thing, really: the filibuster.

In 1806 a rule change in Congress consequentially allowed for senators to obstruct the vote for a bill. To do this, all the senator has to do is take the floor and talk. As long as the senator keeps talking, the debate keeps going. If the debate goes long enough, the vote never happens and the bill bleeds out on Capitol Hill.

In recent decades, the filibuster has been used more often. The Senate opted for a new procedure in 1970 that allowed for a filibuster to be โ€œbustedโ€ when 60 senators agree to call for a vote. Effectively, this means that if a party wants a bill passed, they need more than a simple majority to do it.

One of the most important lessons new policymakers learn is that permanent change comes from slow and intentional decision-making. The best progress is deliberate progress.

Our Framers knew this. Take, for example, the Philadelphia Convention, now commonly referred to as the Constitutional Convention. For almost four months, representatives from every state gathered and debated what started as amendments to the Articles of Confederation and turned out to be a novel framework for the worldโ€™s greatest country.

Almost every day for those four months, the people who founded our government argued and bickered about what it means to run a country effectively. Even after the convention was over, the debates happened for another two years, resulting in the Bill of Rights.

There will likely never be legislation as important as that which took effect on March 4, 1789. That document so many Americans hold dear sets a standard of intentionality that is required of our congressmen and women. The Constitution willfully designed a bicameral legislature that was slow, to encourage thoughtful decision making.

Our countryย needsย the filibuster. In the current socio-political climate, in which our two parties are more divided and extreme than ever in recent history, the filibuster is the only thing left to protect citizens from radical change.ย 

Byย Tripp Worley

Read Full Article on TheFederalist.com

The Federalist
The Federalisthttps://thefederalist.com/
The Federalist is an American conservative online magazine and podcast focused on culture, politics, and religion. "Be lovers of freedom and anxious for the fray".

Columns

DHS Weaponizing Aerosolized Ebola in Clandestine Lab, Rand Paul Alleges

The recent Senate Health Committee hearing featuring RFK Jr....

All in a name

Cardinal Prevost chose the papal name Leo. Among popes, Leos have historically confronted adversity and division and fought for unity with clarity.

How Legal Immigration Is Keeping Farms Afloat

The H-2A visa program is an example of how legal immigration can supply labor in America, but farmers say reform is needed.

Trumpโ€™s EO to Reduce Drug Prices Explained

Trump signed an Executive Order to bring the prices Americans pay for prescription drugs in line with those paid by other nations around the world.

Parents of Autistic Children Weigh In on RFK Jr.โ€™s Plan to Find the Cause

โ€˜The bottom line is we want the truth. We want safe products for our kids,โ€™ said an Ohio dad with an autistic child.

News

5 Takeaways From Supreme Court Hearing on Nationwide Injunctions, Birthright Citizenship

Supreme Court heard oral arguments in relation to Trump adminโ€™s request to lift nationwide injunctions placed on presidentโ€™s birthright citizenship order.

Federal Judge Blocks Trumpโ€™s Order to Strip Foreign Service Bargaining Rights

Judge temporarily blocked President Trumpโ€™s order stripping foreign service workers of collective bargaining rights, granting a preliminary injunction.

New Era of โ€˜Supply Shocksโ€™ Could Force Higher Long-Term Interest Rates, Says Powell

A period of supply disruptions may reshape the U.S. economy, leading to unstable inflation and sustained higher interest rates, says Chair Jerome Powell.

FTC Warns StubHub Over Apparent Failure to List Total Price of Tickets

Ahead of the 2025 NFL season, the FTC sent a letter to StubHub calling for strict compliance with the agencyโ€™s new Rule on Unfair or Deceptive Fees.

Supreme Court Rules 9โ€“0 That Excessive Force Lawsuit May Proceed Against Police Officer

Supreme Court ruled that the mother of a man killed by police during a traffic stop may pursue a civil rights lawsuit against the officer who shot him.

Supreme Court Wrestles With Nationwide Injunctions in Birthright Citizenship Case

Supreme Court grappled with how far federal judges could go in issuing sweeping blocks on policies such as Trumpโ€™s order restricting birthright citizenship.

Lawsuit Alleges Musk, Election PAC Failed to Pay Swing State Petition Signers

Lawsuit filed against Musk and his PAC accuses them of failing to pay registered voters in swing states for signing petition supporting candidate Trump.

Trump Weighs In on Supreme Court Case Involving Birthright Citizenship

President Trump weighed in on the U.S. Supreme Court hearing arguments in a case involving his order to limit birthright citizenship.
spot_img

Related Articles