Since the adoption of Roe V. Wade in 1973, Abortion has taken the lives of over 65,000,000 people. Most of these cases, were conducted with a bumptious conscience, despite the excuse of rape or incest that the left always like to push. As of today, Roe V. Wade was struck down in the Dobbs decision, rightfully allowing states to decide on the issue itself. In Arizona, a court ruled that doctors who perform abortions will not be charged.
As reported by Politico, “An Arizona court has ruled that abortion doctors cannot be prosecuted under a pre-statehood law that criminalizes nearly all abortions yet was barred from being enforced for decades”. As Politico depicts, the court of appeals declined to repeal an 1864 law, that carried a sentence of two to five years in prison if anyone who assists in performing an abortion, unless that abortion was in regard to a case of rape or incest.
Additionally, the thesis of the court’s ruling is that other Arizona laws allow doctors to legally perform abortions, however, non-doctors would still be subject to charges under the old law, as Politco conveyed. Moreover, the pre-statehood law would only allow abortions if the mother’s life is in danger or “jeopardy”, yet, this ruling was eventually struck down with the adoption of the execrable Roe V. Wade decision, which stated that women have the “constitutional right” to an abortion. Where in the constitution is this right stated? Is their a specific page in which I can find it?
Since the propitious reversal of Roe, Arizona Attorney General, Mark Brnovich, asked a state judge for the law to be implemented, Politico states. In response to Brnovich’ inquiry, the Arizona court of appeals depicted, “the legislature has created a complex regulatory scheme to achieve its intent to restrict — but not to eliminate — elective abortions.” Accordingly, Brittany Foteno, President of the calamitous Planned Parenthood organization of Arizona, conveyed that the decision from the court of appeals, effectively means that a state law limiting abortions to 15 weeks would remain in place. This is Ms. Foteno’s following statement: “The Arizona Court of Appeals has given us the clarity that Planned Parenthood Arizona has been seeking for months: When provided by licensed physicians in compliance with Arizona’s other laws and regulations, abortion through 15 weeks will remain legal.”
Accordingly, the court of appeals ultimately rejected Brnovich’s claim that doctors could be prosecuted for conducting abortions. The syllogism by the court was, “Brnovich’s interpretation would not merely invite arbitrary enforcement, it would practically demand it,” Overall, the court argued that Brnovich’s claim would attempt to “eliminate abortion” rather than “regulate it”. Where is the logic in this? Doctors who ultimately kill a baby, should be prosecuted along with the mother who made the decision to kill her own child. It’s a bumptious act. Above all, I acknowledge that at times such a decision may be difficult, however, based on statistics, the excuses the left uses, are running out of steam, considering the rarity of rape and incest in abortions.
The idea that someone would celebrate abortion, is appalling. The left constantly likes to contemplate that they are pro-women, however, they are the same party that had stripped women of their scholarship opportunities, solely based on their support for the integration of biological males into women’s sports. Is this supporting women? Moreover, the left’s support for such an act, has led to biological males, whom identify as females, to rape women. This is what the left supports. When it comes to abortion, the excuse is always rape and incest. Yet, rape and incest make up only 1.5% of all abortion cases. Think about that. Every child aborted is someone who could’ve become the next president, doctor, surgeon, police officer. Firefighter, soldier, if only given the chance. As president Reagan said, “I’ve noticed that everyone who’s for abortion has already been born”.
