Bloated Bipartisan $1.1 Trillion Infrastructure Bill Is Neither Reasonable nor Centrist

5Mind. The Meme Platform
The Heritage Foundation

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  1. The bipartisan group of senators that just passed a $1.1 trillion federal infrastructure bill is attempting to sell it as a reasonable, centrist compromise.
  2. If approved by the House, the bill would immensely expand the size and power of the federal government, among other issues.
  3. Besides all the abominable policies, the trillions in new taxes necessary to fund both bills would cripple the American economy.

The bipartisan group of senators that just passed a $1.1 trillion federal infrastructure bill is attempting to sell it as a reasonable, centrist compromise. Yet it is neither reasonable nor centrist.

If approved by the House, the bill would immensely expand the size and power of the federal government, waste hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars on things that aren’t federal responsibilities, and promote expensive, far-left causes like climate change and taxpayer subsidies for green energy companies.

But that’s not all.

Take that $1.1 trillion infrastructure bill and add to it a second bill that’s more than triple the cost, waste, and government expansion—a $3.5 trillion budget bill (the largest in history) that “has to” be passed along with the infrastructure bill.

9 Things You Need to Know About the Budget Resolution’s Reckless Tax and Spending Spree

Improving America’s infrastructure is certainly a worthwhile goal. But this infrastructure bill won’t deliver on its promises because of its failure to properly prioritize projects. For example, things like mass transit and Amtrak would get about the same amount that’s allocated for highways, even though buses and rail account for only a tiny fraction of Americans’ travel.

The bill also includes exorbitant amounts of taxpayer-funded corporate welfare for the energy sector, including grants and loan guarantees for politically favored companies and technologies.

And the bill spends nearly $65 billion to expand broadband internet service. While improving broadband may be worthwhile, it’s not public infrastructure the way roads and bridges are. Additionally, nearly $3 billion of that would go toward “achieving digital equity,” which includes ensuring that prisoners have high-speed internet. Is providing prisoners premium broadband a higher priority than directing those billions to fix crumbling bridges?

Lawmakers want to pay for the bill’s spending in ways that are inappropriate or will never raise the amount of money needed to cover its costs.

One of the worst pay-for gimmicks is known as “pension smoothing,” and it puts the costs on the backs of millions of the nation’s employees. The bill will allow corporations to reduce the amount they are required to contribute to their employees’ pension funds and instead use that money to increase their profit margins.

Why would politicians promote such behavior? Because while it shortchanges pension funds by about $9 billion, the federal government gets to tax the resulting corporate revenue.

But as bad as the infrastructure bill is, the really egregious part is that those controlling Congress have said that they won’t allow the bill to reach the president’s desk unless a $3.5 trillion budget package is passed along with it.  

The budget package would be the largest tax-and-spend bill in history, and they propose paying for it by dramatically increasing taxes on businesses and investments—at the same time we are trying to spur a post-pandemic economic recovery.

You may remember that the tax cuts on businesses in 2017 led in part to the lowest unemployment rates in 50 years and higher wages for even the lowest income earners. This bill will reverse much of that.

Additional harmful elements of the $3.5 trillion plan (and there are many more than I have the space to mention here) include the largest expansion of welfare benefits since the 1960s. As the former Virginia Secretary of Health and Human Resources who successfully reformed the state’s welfare program in the 1990s, I can say without hesitation that the policies created by this welfare expansion will harm both recipients and society. They discourage recipients from looking for work, promote even more dependency on government, and create generational poverty.

The budget agreement would also make much of the Green New Deal climate change agenda a reality, providing huge amounts of taxpayer-funded corporate welfare to favored green industries, even though the science shows that such initiatives actually generate few environmental benefits.

The bill would also expand government subsidies for the Affordable Care Act and expand control over existing health programs, moving America that much closer to government-run health care and reducing consumer choices.

6 Troubling Leftist Wins in $1.1 Trillion Infrastructure Bill

Moreover, it would give amnesty to illegal immigrants. Apparently, in Washington’s upside-down world, amnesty is now considered a budget item.

Besides all the abominable policies, the trillions in new taxes necessary to fund both bills would cripple the American economy.

President Biden says the tax increases would be borne by businesses and the rich, but raising taxes on businesses hurts all Americans, especially poor and working families. The simple fact is that companies have to pay for higher taxes somehow, and they usually do it by charging higher prices, lowering wages, or investing in operations and jobs overseas where taxes are cheaper.

In the end, this massive two-bill package would increase costs for American families, chase jobs out of the country, add trillions to the debt, and concentrate more power in the federal government. It’s filled with false promises of new “free” benefits that are only possible through higher costs and less liberty for every American.

By Kay C. James
President of The Heritage Foundation

Read Original Article on Heritage.org

Contact Your Elected Officials
The Heritage Foundation
The Heritage Foundationhttps://www.heritage.org/
The Heritage Foundation formulates and promotes public policies based on free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional values, and strong national defense.

The SCOTUS Trump Tariff Test

There is an old expression that goes "If you're...

SCOTUS Strikes Down Tariffs, Judgment Fund, Citizens Will Pay

Trump tariffs ruled illegal; taxpayers pay twice—higher prices in stores, then again through Judgment Fund payouts for mismanagement.

The Poisoning of the Mind: How Public Education Stopped Educating

The most disturbing part of our failing educational system is how few care. Failing to educate children is failing the present and abandoning the future.

MSM’s “Debunked” Big Lie of the 2020 Election

Today, it seems, the news media is being controlled by dark forces whether its the “The Deep State”, the "Intelligence Community" or "Globalist Elites".

“Despite” the Truth

Despite signals media skepticism—like “bless his heart”—subtly masking criticism of Trump’s policies and their real-world impact.

Student ICE Protests Lead to Lockdowns, Debate Over Discipline in Pennsylvania Schools

A pair of Pennsylvania school districts are the latest to grapple with after effects from student walkouts to protest ICE.

MAHA Proponents React to Trump’s Executive Order on Glyphosate

Invoking the Defense Production Act, Trump signed an EO propelling the domestic production of elemental phosphorus and glyphosate-based herbicides.

Alysa Liu Wins Olympic Figure Skating Gold, First for US Women in 24 Years

American figure skater Alysa Liu emerged victorious in the Olympics, winning the US’ first Olympic gold medal in women’s figure skating since 2002.

Judge Temporarily Blocks Referendum to Redraw Virginia’s Congressional Map

A Virginia judge halted a Democrat-backed referendum to redraw congressional districts, issuing an emergency restraining order pausing the effort.

USTR Will Launch New Trade Probes Covering Major Trading Partners, Greer Says

U.S. Trade Rep Jamieson Greer will launch Section 301 probes targeting major trading partners, signaling broader trade enforcement.

Trump Signs Order to Impose 10 Percent Global Tariffs After Supreme Court Ruling

Trump signed an order to impose a 10% global tariff in response to the Supreme Court striking down sweeping levies issued under an emergency powers law.

Trump Signs Order Declaring Glyphosate Production as Critical to National Security

Trump signed an executive order declaring the U.S. glyphosate supply, a controversial herbicide, critical to national and food security key efforts.
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

MAGA Business Central