Bloated Bipartisan $1.1 Trillion Infrastructure Bill Is Neither Reasonable nor Centrist

Contact Your Elected Officials
The Heritage Foundation

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  1. The bipartisan group of senators that just passed a $1.1 trillion federal infrastructure bill is attempting to sell it as a reasonable, centrist compromise.
  2. If approved by the House, the bill would immensely expand the size and power of the federal government, among other issues.
  3. Besides all the abominable policies, the trillions in new taxes necessary to fund both bills would cripple the American economy.

The bipartisan group of senators that just passed a $1.1 trillion federal infrastructure bill is attempting to sell it as a reasonable, centrist compromise. Yet it is neither reasonable nor centrist.

If approved by the House, the bill would immensely expand the size and power of the federal government, waste hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars on things that aren’t federal responsibilities, and promote expensive, far-left causes like climate change and taxpayer subsidies for green energy companies.

But that’s not all.

Take that $1.1 trillion infrastructure bill and add to it a second bill that’s more than triple the cost, waste, and government expansion—a $3.5 trillion budget bill (the largest in history) that “has to” be passed along with the infrastructure bill.

9 Things You Need to Know About the Budget Resolution’s Reckless Tax and Spending Spree

Improving America’s infrastructure is certainly a worthwhile goal. But this infrastructure bill won’t deliver on its promises because of its failure to properly prioritize projects. For example, things like mass transit and Amtrak would get about the same amount that’s allocated for highways, even though buses and rail account for only a tiny fraction of Americans’ travel.

The bill also includes exorbitant amounts of taxpayer-funded corporate welfare for the energy sector, including grants and loan guarantees for politically favored companies and technologies.

And the bill spends nearly $65 billion to expand broadband internet service. While improving broadband may be worthwhile, it’s not public infrastructure the way roads and bridges are. Additionally, nearly $3 billion of that would go toward “achieving digital equity,” which includes ensuring that prisoners have high-speed internet. Is providing prisoners premium broadband a higher priority than directing those billions to fix crumbling bridges?

Lawmakers want to pay for the bill’s spending in ways that are inappropriate or will never raise the amount of money needed to cover its costs.

One of the worst pay-for gimmicks is known as “pension smoothing,” and it puts the costs on the backs of millions of the nation’s employees. The bill will allow corporations to reduce the amount they are required to contribute to their employees’ pension funds and instead use that money to increase their profit margins.

Why would politicians promote such behavior? Because while it shortchanges pension funds by about $9 billion, the federal government gets to tax the resulting corporate revenue.

But as bad as the infrastructure bill is, the really egregious part is that those controlling Congress have said that they won’t allow the bill to reach the president’s desk unless a $3.5 trillion budget package is passed along with it.  

The budget package would be the largest tax-and-spend bill in history, and they propose paying for it by dramatically increasing taxes on businesses and investments—at the same time we are trying to spur a post-pandemic economic recovery.

You may remember that the tax cuts on businesses in 2017 led in part to the lowest unemployment rates in 50 years and higher wages for even the lowest income earners. This bill will reverse much of that.

Additional harmful elements of the $3.5 trillion plan (and there are many more than I have the space to mention here) include the largest expansion of welfare benefits since the 1960s. As the former Virginia Secretary of Health and Human Resources who successfully reformed the state’s welfare program in the 1990s, I can say without hesitation that the policies created by this welfare expansion will harm both recipients and society. They discourage recipients from looking for work, promote even more dependency on government, and create generational poverty.

The budget agreement would also make much of the Green New Deal climate change agenda a reality, providing huge amounts of taxpayer-funded corporate welfare to favored green industries, even though the science shows that such initiatives actually generate few environmental benefits.

The bill would also expand government subsidies for the Affordable Care Act and expand control over existing health programs, moving America that much closer to government-run health care and reducing consumer choices.

6 Troubling Leftist Wins in $1.1 Trillion Infrastructure Bill

Moreover, it would give amnesty to illegal immigrants. Apparently, in Washington’s upside-down world, amnesty is now considered a budget item.

Besides all the abominable policies, the trillions in new taxes necessary to fund both bills would cripple the American economy.

President Biden says the tax increases would be borne by businesses and the rich, but raising taxes on businesses hurts all Americans, especially poor and working families. The simple fact is that companies have to pay for higher taxes somehow, and they usually do it by charging higher prices, lowering wages, or investing in operations and jobs overseas where taxes are cheaper.

In the end, this massive two-bill package would increase costs for American families, chase jobs out of the country, add trillions to the debt, and concentrate more power in the federal government. It’s filled with false promises of new “free” benefits that are only possible through higher costs and less liberty for every American.

By Kay C. James
President of The Heritage Foundation

Read Original Article on Heritage.org

The Heritage Foundation
The Heritage Foundationhttps://www.heritage.org/
The Heritage Foundation formulates and promotes public policies based on free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional values, and strong national defense.

 A Painful Admission for Conservatives: Must the Culture War End?

Francis Fukuyama believed the market system won the economic argument, however if you go to any university, you can see that socialism isn't dead.

Did Alex Jones Throw His Sandy Hook Defamation Cases?

Yesterday we posted an article questioning some of the...

Can Putin Legally Stop The Conflict Without First Controlling All The Disputed Territory?

Steve Witkoff’s claim that Russia made “some concessions” on territorial issues, remains solely a hypothetical scenario for now.

Was Alex Jones the First Victim of Lawfare?

Podcaster Zach De Gregorio of the Wolves and Finance channel dropped a well researched episode, “Trump Turns His Back On Alex Jones”.

Executive Orders Shift the Power to “Legislate”

The Constitution does not define EOs, yet Presidents issue them to assert legislative power, which is designated to Congress under the Constitution. 

DOJ to Start Handing Over Epstein Files to Congress, House Oversight Committee Leader Says

A top House Republican said Monday that the DOJ has agreed to hand over documents from the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking investigation.

The War Summit Drags On, but Stocks Keep Rising

Based on hopes of the Ukraine war ending, plus other factors,major stock indexes are up an average of 2% in 1st half of August – normally a weak month.

Best Buy Jumps on Digital Marketplace Bandwagon—Doubling Its Online Products

Best Buy will launch its new digital marketplace, BestBuy.com, which will more than double the current number of products available online.

US Seeks Intel Stake in Exchange for Federal Grants

U.S. govt. is seeking an equity stake in chipmaker Intel, Commerce Sec. Lutnick said as Biden's CHIPS and Science Act awarded Intel $11 billion in grants.

DOJ Won’t Appeal Judge’s Order on Concealed Carry Ban in Post Offices

DOJ said it will dismiss its appeal in a case challenging the federal ban on the concealed carry of a firearm in U.S. Postal Service offices.

123 Wasteful Government Contracts Valued at More Than $5 Billion Canceled, DOGE Says

DOGE has terminated 123 “wasteful contracts” over the past five days with a ceiling value of $5.3 billion and savings of $4.2 billion, DOGE said in X post.

AG Bondi Sends Demand Letters to Sanctuary Jurisdictions, Threatens Legal Action

AG Pam Bondi sent demand letters to sanctuary jurisdictions for their policies limiting or prohibiting cooperation with federal immigration enforcement.

Trump Signs Order to Refill Strategic Reserves of Pharmaceutical Ingredients

Trump signed EO to enhance American drug supply chain resilience by filling and maintaining the strategic reserve for essential pharmaceutical ingredients.
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

MAGA Business Central