“Rights” are specific unalienable endowments of freedom bestowed freely by nature’s God on all human beings everywhere. In the USA, the “rights” of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are among the endowments written down and, supposedly, held sacred, and secured and protected by government.
In other words, men, women, and children, born and unborn, have the unalienable right to be born and live without the fear of death and repression looming over them. This is the “right” to an unfettered life without being deprived of that life by people who would seek to flippantly snuff it out by force or violence.
There is certainly more than enough natural death in the republic that sadly occurs unexpectedly from sickness and accidents (caused by both negligence and unavoidability) without adding to that great number the egregious number of homicides (murders, manslaughter) and suicides. As expected, people young and old sadly die every day, which is a natural ongoing component of life, but when unnecessary intentional death occurs and is applauded and acclaimed by ignorant people as a “right,” my stomach is egregiously turned and I am sickened.
Poignantly, I am reminded of what occurred in 1985, in San Diego, California in the life of a very liberal man, a federal Assistant DA and Democrat, who was a card-carrying member of the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) and the ACLU. He was a young 30-year-old man married to a beautiful young woman who was pregnant in her seventh month of gestation carrying healthy twins. The DA was anxiously anticipating being the proud father of a new son and a daughter.
Well, to make a long story short, the wife was in a convenience store in San Diego one afternoon when it was robbed by two armed felons who enjoyed killing. The beautiful young wife was shot three times and she and her babies were killed almost instantly.
When the ADA received word of the murder of his wife, son, and daughter, he maddeningly stormed out of his office and the federal building in which he worked and immediately saw a man on the street carrying a sign saying “Abortion is a right.” Seeing the man, the ADA grabbed the sign and with it hit the man carrying it over the head. He then took out his ACLU and SPLC cards and conspicuously tore them up, scattering the pieces in the wind.
One of the hardly used synonyms for abortion is the word “murder.” There’s no other way to say it if the life of a healthy baby boy or girl is taken by abortion with malice aforethought while in the mother’s womb; and murder is definitely not an unalienable “right.” Rather, a protected life is a “right.”
Between 1933 and 1945, over nine thousand Jews, men, women, and children were slaughtered in Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia by order of fascist dictatorial government. In the American republic, from January 1973 until reversed by the SCOTUS June 24, 2022, the federal legalization of abortion-on-demand by the Earl Warren SCOTUS by the case of Roe v. Wade allowed the slaughter of over 50 million healthy unborn babies, unborn citizens of the USA.
After passage of the egregious Roe v. Wade, liberal Americans had the unmitigated audacity to wave signs protesting “right” to life saying “Abortion is a right.” Does the literate reasonable member of the electorate realize that the murder-abortion of 50 million healthy unborn children is like decimating the populations of five cities the size of NYC? I wouldn’t be surprised to see irrational liberal Democrats in the District of Columbia waving signs in the faces of police officers and national guard troops saying “murder is a right.”
Unalienable “rights” are wonderful liberties given by a gracious God of nature to mankind to be held sacred in perpetuity, or forever. Rights can, therefore, not be terminated or repealed by government; they can only be expanded in their force and effect by government.
As expressed in the Preamble of the US Constitution, the wise and prudent Framers wrote the US Constitution and Bill of Rights especially for the generations of the republic’s parents to be taught to the republic’s children. You know, the immutably essential cycle of life and learning when the children are taught by their parents the civics that will sustain the republic and they grow up to become parents who will, in turn, teach their children the vital importance of securing the unalienable “rights” bestowed originally by God.
What tragically happens when this essential cycle of civics is egregiously interrupted by a generation of misguided citizens who wrongly believe that such acts as “murder” are “rights?”
When nature is turned on its head by unreasonable people who poisonously solicit to young impressionable members of the electorate that people have the Constitutional “right” to do unnatural acts, reasonable and prudent voices need to be raised in vehement opposition to such blatant indoctrinations.
There is a great difference between the personal freedom of an individual, or individuals, to commit unnatural acts, and the “right” to do so. People have the personal freedom to commit suicide by jumping off mountains, fornicating with goats, or having homosexual relations with other human beings in their bedrooms, but they do not have Constitutional “right” to do these things publicly.
Even though a viciously liberal SCOTUS might proclaim at one particular time in history that these poor aberrant human beings have the Constitutional “right” to commit filthy unnatural acts, fifty years later a wiser more prudent conservative SCOTUS might reverse such a ruling.
As a final thought, the words of the great wise King Solomon might be seriously considered by reasonable men and women in the USA as particularly applicable to a republic so drawn to an infatuation with unnatural human behavior.
In Proverbs 14:34 it says, “Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a reproach to any people.”
