Federal Judge Rules Against Natural Immunity Claim Challenging COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate

5Mind. The Meme Platform
The Epoch Times Header

A federal judge on Oct. 8 denied a request to block Michigan State University’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate on the basis of natural immunity.

An employee at the school, Jeanna Norris, filed a lawsuit against the mandate and asked a judge to intervene on the basis that she had already contracted COVID-19 and recovered. She presented two antibody tests showing her previous infection, and her doctors told her that she didn’t need to get the vaccine at this time.

Despite her natural immunity, Norris faces termination from the university for not complying with the school’s mandate that all students and staff get the shot unless they have a medical or religious exemption.

U.S. District Judge Paul Maloney, an appointee of former President George W. Bush, declined her lawsuit. The mandate, Maloney said, didn’t violate her fundamental rights and pointed to a 1905 Supreme Court ruling.

“This Court must apply the law from the Supreme Court: Jacobson essentially applied rational basis review and found that the vaccine mandate was rational in ‘protect[ing] the public health and public safety,’” Maloney said in his order. “The Court cannot ignore this binding precedent.”

Some studies have shown that natural immunity afforded by a previous COVID-19 infection provides longer-lasting and stronger protection against the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus than the vaccines. An Israeli study published in August compared individuals who had a previous infection with those who received the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccine and said their “analysis demonstrated that natural immunity affords longer-lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease, and hospitalization due to the Delta variant.”

“This is the largest real-world observational study comparing natural immunity, gained through previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, to vaccine-induced immunity, afforded by the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine,” the study said.

Lawyers for Norris told The Washington Times that she’s considering legal alternatives.

“Ms. Norris courageously brought this lawsuit to vindicate the constitutional rights of individuals with naturally acquired immunity to COVID-19 who are subject to irrational vaccine mandates,” Jenin Younes, a lawyer who works for the New Civil Liberties Alliance, who represents Norris, told the paper. “While we are disappointed by today’s order, we are committed to fighting for the rights of COVID-recovered Americans to decline a medically unnecessary vaccine without having to sacrifice their livelihoods.”

It comes just days after a federal judge in California ruled against a professor who argued that his previous infection should make him exempt from the University of California’s vaccine requirement.

Michigan State officials didn’t immediately respond to a request by The Epoch Times for comment.

By Jack Phillips

Read Full Article on TheEpochTimes.com

Contact Your Elected Officials
The Epoch Times
The Epoch Timeshttps://www.theepochtimes.com/
Tired of biased news? The Epoch Times is truthful, factual news that other media outlets don't report. No spin. No agenda. Just honest journalism like it used to be.

Post-Epstein Document Dump: The Moment for Left-Right Populist Unity?

Claims that a powerful, lawless network of child abusers has captured major Western institutions are now asserted with unprecedented certainty.

When care leads to death

On December 12, Illinois legalize physician assisted suicide, rebranded under the soothing sounding banner of “medical aid in dying,” or MAID.

Two Big Game Halftime Show Options

During the Super Bowl this year there will be two halftime shows going on at the same time competing for viewers.

‘Fantasizing About the Caribbean Island’: A Leftist Demigod’s Epic Fall From Grace

I forever washed my hands of Noam Chomsky when he demanded that the unvaccinated be “isolated from society.”

Pride and Prejudice and the Modern Woman: What the Story Should Still Mean to Us Today

Why should Jane Austin's Pride and Prejudice be so influential? Because it upholds biblical precepts pertaining to purity, manhood and womanhood.

‘All-American Halftime Show’ Serves as Alternative to Super Bowl’s Bad Bunny, Green Day Performance

Dueling halftime performances will vie for the attention of viewers across the world at Super Bowl LX in Santa Clara, California, on Sunday night.

Pentagon to Cut Academic Ties With Harvard, Hegseth Says

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth said the Pentagon will cut all academic ties with Harvard, saying the university no longer meets military services needs.

Appeals Court Rejects Challenge to Trump’s Orders Curbing DEI

A federal appeals court turned away a challenge to President Trump’s EO ending so-called DEI programs in the federal government.

Nearly 2,000 Truckers Deemed Unfit Are Removed From American Roads

Nearly 2,000 truckers deemed unqualified to drive on U.S. roads have been removed, with arrests made and many vehicles placed out of service, DOT said.

Why Canada’s China Pivot Makes US Tariff Relief Harder

Analysts say Ottawa’s Beijing outreach is raising new security and trade concerns in Washington—making U.S. tariff relief even harder to secure.

Trump Lifts Biden-Era Restrictions on Commercial Fishing in Atlantic Marine Monument

President Trump revoked a prohibition on commercial fishing in the Northeast Canyons and Seamounts Marine National Monument.

US Unveils Interim Trade Framework With India, Drops Punitive Tariff

“The Interim trade framework between the US and India will represent a historic milestone in our countries’ partnership" countries said in a joint statement.

Trump Says He’s Still Looking ‘Seriously’ at Sending $2,000 Tariff Rebate Payments

Trump said in an interview that his administration is still considering sending out $2,000 payments to Americans derived from his tariffs.
spot_img

Related Articles