Forensic Report: Dominion Voting System Designed to Influence Election Results

Russell Ramsland Jr., co-founder of Allied Security Operations Group, has put out the forensic audit report of Dominion Voting Systems machines and software in Michigan and the report states that:

“We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results.”

‘We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results,’ Russell Ramsland Jr., co-founder of Allied Security Operations Group, said in a preliminary report.

He added that “The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud. Based on our study, we conclude that The Dominion Voting System should not be used in Michigan. We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified.”

Allied Security Operations states that Dominion’s involvement in the elections is a “national security imperative” and referred to Trumps Executive Order on Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election which directs the current Director of National Intelligence (John Ratcliffe) to “conduct an assessment of any information indicating that a foreign government, or any person acting as an agent of or on behalf of a foreign government, has acted with the intent or purpose of interfering in that election”.

“We recommend that an independent group should be empaneled to determine the extent of the adjudication errors throughout the State of Michigan. This is a national security issue.”

The report also asserted that the “results of the Antrim County 2020 election are not certifiable,” adding that it’s the result of “machine and/or software error, not human error.”

Dominion Voting machines are used in 30 states including in Nevada, Arizona, Minnesota, Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia, Pennsylvania and California.

The Allied Security Operations Group team used X-Ways Forensics and other tools including Blackbag-Blacklight Forensic Software, and Virtual Box to inspect and perform forensic duplication on the county’s election management server. The server was running Dominion Democracy Suite 5.5.3-002. they also checked compact flash cards used by local precincts in their Dominion ImageCast system, USB memory sticks used by Dominion Voter Assist Terminals, and USB memory sticks used for the poll book.

Ramsland said the tabulation log for the forensic examination of the server for the county showed 15,676 individual events. Of those, some 68 percent were recorded errors.

In the report Ramsland wrote, ‘These errors resulted in overall tabulation errors or ballots being sent to adjudication. This high error rates proves the Dominion Voting System is flawed and does not meet state or federal election laws.’

And then added, ‘A staggering number of votes required adjudication. This was a 2020 issue not seen in previous election cycles still stored on the server. This is caused by intentional errors in the system. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, or audit trail. Our examination of the server logs indicates that this high error rate was incongruent with patterns from previous years. The statement attributing these issues to human error is not consistent with the forensic evaluation, which points more correctly to systemic machine and/or software errors. The systemic errors are intentionally designed to create errors in order to push a high volume of ballots to bulk adjudication.”

There was a separate declaration by a Michigan resident, Gustavo Delfino, who said he was involved in an election in his native country of Venezuela in 2004 where he witnessed events that he found strange. He later discovered discrepancies in Smartmatic computers. He explains how alarmed he became when he learned the technology was being used in the November 3, 2020 presidential election. He says that the pattern of so-called “glitches” and the fact that the voting machines were connected to the Internet was exactly like what took place in Venezuela almost two decades ago.

The report also states the Crucial security and adjudication logs are missing from the Dominion Voting Systems machines from Michigan’s Antrim County and that the Dominion voting machines rejected an extraordinary number of ballots for adjudication, the process where election workers determine the outcome for each ballot.

“Significantly, the computer system shows vote adjudication logs for prior years; but all adjudication log entries for the 2020 election cycle are missing. The adjudication process is the simplest way to manually manipulate votes. The lack of records prevents any form of audit accountability, and their conspicuous absence is extremely suspicious since the files exist for previous years using the same software.”

“We must conclude that the 2020 election cycle records have been manually removed.”

“The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commission guidelines is of 1 in 250,000 ballots,” Ramsland said. “We observed an error rate of 68.05 percent. This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity.”

“These errors resulted in overall tabulation errors or ballots being sent to adjudication. This high error rates proves the Dominion Voting System is flawed and does not meet state or federal election laws,” he added. “Because the intentional high error rate generates large numbers of ballots to be adjudicated by election personnel, we must deduce that bulk adjudication occurred. However, because files and adjudication logs are missing, we have not yet determined where the bulk adjudication occurred or who was responsible for it. Our research continues.”

Information about Dominion Voting Machines Flaws

Dominion Voting Machine Flaws — 2020 Election Coffee County, Georgia Video 1

The Dominion voting machines that Georgia and several other states use are unsecure and open to manipulation during the counting process. This first of two videos shows the weaknesses of the system and the ways in which an unscrupulous election official may alter ballots with virtually no chance of being caught.

Dominion Voting Machine Flaws — 2020 Election Coffee County, Georgia Video 2

The Dominion voting machines that Georgia and several other states use are unsecure and open to manipulation during the counting process. This second of two videos shows the weaknesses of the system and the ways in which an unscrupulous election official may alter ballots with virtually no chance of being caught.