In letter, Hawley calls on Biden to drop support for Ukraine membership in NATO

Contact Your Elected Officials

February 1, 2022

The Honorable Antony Blinken
Secretary of State
U.S. Department of State
2201 C Street NW
Washington, D.C. 20520

Dear Secretary Blinken,

I write to request clarity about the Biden administrationโ€™s support for Ukraineโ€™s prospective membership in NATO.

Article 10 of the North Atlantic Treaty provides for the Allianceโ€™s expansion. It stipulates that such expansion can occur only by unanimous agreement and that only a โ€œEuropean State in a position to further the principles of this Treaty and to contribute to the security of the North Atlantic areaโ€ may receive invitation to the Alliance. The United States has supported multiple rounds of NATO enlargement since the end of the Cold War, consistent with the requirements of Article 10.

The United States has also signaled support for further enlargement, including to Ukraine. As the United States and its allies declared at the 2008 Bucharest Summit, โ€œNATO welcomes Ukraineโ€™s and Georgiaโ€™s Euro-Atlantic aspirations for membership in NATO. We agreed today that these countries will become members of NATO.โ€ You testified to this effect before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on July 8, 2021, when you stated, โ€œWe support Ukraine membership in NATO.โ€ Yet it is not clear that Ukraineโ€™s accession would serve U.S. interests. Indeed, deteriorating conditions in the global security environment caution otherwise.

The world of 2008 is gone. Today, an increasingly powerful China seeks hegemony in the Indo-Pacific. If China succeeds, it could harness that regionโ€™s resources to further propel its rise, while restricting U.S. access to many of the worldโ€™s most important markets. Americansโ€™ security and prosperity rest upon our ability to keep that from happening, and so the United States must shift resources to the Indo-Pacific to deny Chinaโ€™s bid for regional domination. This means the United States can no longer carry the heavy burden it once did in other regions of the world โ€“ including Europe. To the contrary, we must do less in those secondary theaters in order to prioritize denying Chinaโ€™s hegemonic ambitions in the Indo-Pacific.

This Administrationโ€™s support for Ukraineโ€™s membership in NATO defies these realities. The United States has an interest in maintaining Ukraineโ€™s independence, sovereignty, and territorial integrity. And we should urgently deliver to Ukraine assistance it needs to defend itself against Russiaโ€™s military buildup and other threats. Our interest is not so strong, however, as to justify committing the United States to go to war with Russia over Ukraineโ€™s fate. Rather, we must aid Ukraine in a manner that aligns with the American interests at stake and preserves our ability to deny Chinese hegemony in the Indo-Pacific.

Concerns about NATO enlargement might be lessened if our European allies were shouldering their fair share of the burden of our collective defense. Were they doing so, then it might not be so difficult for NATO to admit new members, without jeopardizing Americaโ€™s ability to keep its focus on the Indo-Pacific. But that is not the case โ€“ in fact, it is quite the opposite.

In 2006, NATO allies agreed to spend at least two percent of national GDP on defense. They reaffirmed this commitment eight years later in the 2014 Wales Pledge. Yet today โ€“ more than 15 years since the initial spending agreement โ€“ only 19 have met their commitment. As U.S. Ambassador to NATO Julianne Smith noted prior to her confirmation, โ€œnineteen Allies out of thirty are not enough.โ€ But this is an understatement.

It also belies the fact that NATOโ€™s two percent spending goal was adopted in and for a world that no longer exists. The world has grown far more dangerous in the years since 2006. As a consequence, two percent is no longer a sufficient minimum for allied defense spending. Put differently, the Wales Pledge is now obsolete. For NATO to remain viable, especially as the United States shifts resources to the Indo-Pacific, our European allies must increase defense spending above two percent of GDP.

Finally, some argue that now is not the right time to ask hard questions about Ukraineโ€™s prospective membership in NATO. But I submit that now is exactly the right time for confronting hard truths. Russiaโ€™s buildup on Ukraineโ€™s borders makes apparent just how important it is for the United States to be deliberate about its commitments abroad. Already, President Biden has announced that the United States will send more conventional forces to Europe, if Russia invades Ukraine. Such a deployment can only detract from the U.S. militaryโ€™s ability to ready and modernize forces to deter China in the Indo-Pacific. But those opportunity costs pale in comparison to what would be expected โ€“ indeed, required โ€“ of the United States, were NATO actually to admit Ukraine as a member.

Chinaโ€™s rise has collapsed basic assumptions in U.S. foreign policy. The legacy of a bygone era, the Biden administrationโ€™s support for Ukraineโ€™s prospective membership in NATO demands particular scrutiny. Therefore, I request your written responses to the following questions no later than February 28, 2022:

  1. How would Ukraineโ€™s admission to NATO contribute to the security of the North Atlantic area, as required by Article 10 of the North Atlantic Treaty, particularly given Ukraineโ€™s vulnerability to Russian invasion?
  2. Do you believe Ukraineโ€™s admission to NATO would improve U.S. national security sufficiently to justify the United States committing itself to fight Russia over Ukraine now or in the foreseeable future?
  3. Were Ukraine to be admitted to the Alliance, would you be concerned about the United Statesโ€™ ability to defend Ukraine against Russian military aggression, while simultaneously deterring or defeating Chinese aggression in the IndoPacific?
  4. Do you commit to ask for and receive the Secretary of Defenseโ€™s certification that the U.S. military will be able to defend Ukraine against Russian aggression, in cooperation with other NATO allies, without undermining its ability to simultaneously deter or defeat Chinese aggression in the Indo-Pacific, prior to taking any further action in support of Ukrainian membership in NATO?
  5. Do you agree that NATO alliesโ€™ failure to spend more than two percent on their own defense necessarily limits the Allianceโ€™s ability to accept additional members, particularly as the United States shifts military resources to the IndoPacific?
  6. Do you agree that it would be prudent for the United States to wait until NATO allies, including Germany, are spending more than two percent of national GDP on defense before taking any further action in support of Ukrainian membership in NATO?

Thank you for your attention to this important matter.

Sincerely,

Josh Hawley
United States Senator

CC:
The Honorable Lloyd J. Austin, III
Secretary of Defense
U.S. Department of Defense
1000 Defense Pentagon
Washington, D.C. 20301

The Thinking Conservative
The Thinking Conservativehttps://www.thethinkingconservative.com/
The goal of THE THINKING CONSERVATIVE is to help us educate ourselves on conservative topics of importance to our freedom and our pursuit of happiness. We do this by sharing conservative opinions on all kinds of subjects, from all types of people, and all kinds of media, in a way that will challenge our perceptions and help us to make educated choices.

Remember Epsteinโ€™s โ€œLittle Black Booksโ€?

Image of Bill Clinton getting a massage from Jeffrey...

On the Major Leagueโ€™s periphery: A major trip through the minors

For Nick Dunn, the trek through the minors is a trifecta of physical, mental, and organizational hurdles filled with politics, roster volatility, and injuries.

Private Citizens are Now Looking into Epstein Client List

Most Americans have never felt so betrayed and confused by a president and his admin as they are by the Trump admin over the Epstein client list issue.

Peace In Ukraine Wonโ€™t End The Westโ€™s Hybrid War On Russia

The Westโ€™s Hybrid War on Russia to follow peace in Ukraine is inevitable due to neoconservatives and liberal-globalists in its decision-making ecosystem.

Epstein Case Closed?

The DOJ and FBI announced on Sunday evening of the July 4th holiday weekend that Jeffry Epstein had no client list and didnโ€™t kill himself in prison.

Federal Judge Blocks Trumpโ€™s Birthright Citizenship Order After Supreme Court Ruling

Judge barred Trump admin from enforcing EO limiting birthright citizenship, after Supreme Court restricted judges from issuing nationwide injunctions.

California Might Stop Making Necessary Debt Payments for 2 Years

California State Legislature met the budget submission deadline and it was signed by the governor, but they still need to cut $12 billion in spending.

MP Materials Secures Rare Earths Deal With DOD, Shares Surge 50 Percent

MP Materials Corp. announced a public-private partnership with the DOD to build out rare earth magnet supply chain and reduce dependency on China.

Ex-CIA Director Brennan Says DOJ Hasnโ€™t Contacted Him About an Investigation

Former CIA Dir Brennan said he hasn't been contacted by DOJ, FBI, or CIA following reports he and former FBI Dir. Comey are under investigation.

RFK Jr. Bans Illegal Immigrants From Government-Funded Programs

HHS Sec. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is rescinding a 1998 interpretation of a law that allowed illegal immigrants to access certain government-funded programs.

Rubio Set to Visit Malaysia for ASEAN Meetings Amid Tariff Tensions

A delegation including U.S. Sec. of State Marco Rubio will travel to Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, for series of high-profile meetings between July 11 and 12.

US Will Collect More Than $300 Billion in Tariff Revenues This Year, Treasury Secretary Says

U.S. is on track to potentially raise โ€œwell over $300 billionโ€ in tariff income by end of the year, Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent said during WH Cabinet meeting.

Senate Panel Advances Trumpโ€™s CDC Director Nominee

A Senate committee on July 9 voted to advance the nomination of Susan Monarez to lead the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
spot_img

Related Articles