Section 230 is headed to Supreme Court via Jason Fyk’s lawsuit to take back our free speech. First question is from Justice Clarence Thomas.
Trolls say I'm wrong
— Jason Fyk (@JasonFyk) December 11, 2020
FACTS:
$350k a month in lost income
38 million fans gone
FB lied about me and my content
4 lawyers
2 law firms
4 years of researching 230
2.5 years in court
And I found the solution!
I put everything on the line to make social media fair again!
Jason Fyk Tweet: What does it mean if I win against Facebook in the Supreme Court? Answer: websites CAN be held liable as “a publisher” for any action other than to remove HARMFUL content in good faith. In other words no more Fact Checking, unfair censorship or business practices.
What does it mean if I win against Facebook in the Supreme Court?
— Jason Fyk (@JasonFyk) December 11, 2020
Answer: websites CAN be held liable as "a publisher" for any action other than to remove HARMFUL content in good faith.
In other words no more Fact Checking, unfair censorship or business practices.
Jason Fyk Tweet: Breaking: Section 230 is headed to the Supreme Court! I am fighting for all of you. Let’s take back our voice! Question 1. is from Justice Clarence Thomas himself! GAME ON
Breaking: Section 230 is headed to the Supreme Court! I am fighting for all of you. Let's take back our voice! Question 1. is from Justice Clarence Thomas himself! GAME ON pic.twitter.com/06zCNpdXms
— Jason Fyk (@JasonFyk) November 2, 2020
— Jason Fyk (@JasonFyk) November 2, 2020
Jason Fyk Tweet: #Section230 #SCOTUS #cda Petition for Writ or Certiorari 10 page introduction. Time to fix section 230 properly! I’m fighting for everyone who’s been hurt by big tech. Fact check away, this is real and big!
— Jason Fyk (@JasonFyk) November 3, 2020
