Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Embracement of Critical Race Theory

Contact Your Elected Officials

Keisha Russell, a lawyer at First Liberty Institute, argued against the Supreme Court nomination of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, based on the judges belief in Critical Race Theory. This testimony was given on the final day of the Senate Judiciary Committeeโ€™s Supreme Court confirmation hearings.

Transcript

Good morning and thank you for the opportunity to testify.

I’m a constitutional lawyer at First Liberty Institute. First Liberty is a national legal organization with a mission to defend and restore religious liberty for all Americans. In addition to being a lawyer, I’m also the daughter of Jamaican-born parents, and I’m a former elementary school teacher in Atlanta Public Schools.

I’m here to explain how Critical Race Theory may impact a judge’s judicial philosophy, including the fulfillment of her oath to uphold the Constitution as well as to remain impartial and a uphold the integrity and independence of the judiciary.

Critical Race Theory or CRT is a subset of critical theory that began with Immanuel Kant and the 1790s. Critical theory rejected the principles of the Enlightenment and the Age of Reason on which the American Republic was founded. Critical Theory teachers that all human relationships are relationships of power between the oppressors and the oppressed. The oppressor and oppressed lens of critical theory helped establish totalitarian ideologies such as Marxism and Nazism. CRT’s key assertion is that racism is not the result of individual conscious prejudices actions or thoughts, but rather that racism is a systemic and structural force. CRT teachers that racism is embedded in America’s legal systems, institutions and capitalist economy and it demands whiteness as a societal norm.

I will address three of CRT’s erroneous assumptions and the possible impact on judicial philosophy.

Number one, believing that America was founded on race ideals is wrong and compatible with a judge’s ability to uphold the Constitution.

CRT proponents claim that America was founded and the Constitution was drafted to promote racism and slavery. Historians have debunk this claim as false. The truth is that America’s Founders were divided on this issue of slavery and many of the founders were abolitionists. America’s core ideals of freedom and equality, expressed in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, sparked a movement that led to the eventual elimination of both slavery and Jim Crow. CRT is sometimes erroneously analogize to the civil rights movement and some CRT proponents even assert that Dr. King was a critical race theorist, but he was not. Now King would argue that Bull Connor, the head of the Birmingham, Alabama police, and the southern racists, were violating the principles of the American founding. But Critical Race Theory would argue the opposite, that Connor was the fulfillment of of the American founding, because America was founded to perpetuate this white supremacy. Ultimately, we cannot expect someone who subscribed to Critical Race Theory to defend and protect the Constitution because CRT assets that the Constitution is not worth defending. Such a view completely contradicts the oath every judge takes.

Number two, a judge who embraces Critical Race Theory perspective that America must address racism by encouraging racism, cannot be an impartial judge.

Contrary to CRT’s assertion that racism is socially created, racism is a result of individual feelings of superiority and prejudice, there’s no doubt that bad laws will further a racists society, but such racism must first be alive in an individual before it can become alive in society. Ultimately when unaddressed prejudice gets married to power, there is going to be an unintended pregnancy which will give birth to the evil of racism. Since personal prejudices advance a racist society, we cannot address racism by encouraging racist behaviors. Mr. Kendi, on of CRT’s advocates brazenly declares that the only remedy to prevent discrimination is future discrimination. In essence CRT proposes that the oppressed must be granted advantages in society to the detriment of the oppressor group in order to address passed injustices. Adherence to CRT removes the principle of equality before the law that is necessary for just decision-making. Consider, for example, how CRT philosophy could influence a judges view on criminal sentencing. If a judge believes that the only way to correct racism is to provide advantages to blacks the disadvantages whites, this would create dire injustices in that judges practices. A judge who embraces the CRT views may engage in favoritism and partiality contrary to the judicial canons.

Number three, a judge must uphold the integrity and independence of the judiciary, and she cannot do so if she considers systemic racism in her decision-making. While racism is alive in the hearts of many people in our country, it does not determine the outcome of any minorities educational, professional, or economic accomplishments. My own testimony is a reflection of this truth as I am a first generation American and the daughter of Jamaican-born parents, and despite the fact that my parents came to this country to build a life for themselves from the ground up, my parents still raised many successful children. CRT does not acknowledge that regardless of the struggle that people face in life, we are all individually responsible for the lives we live and the success we attain. Instead CRT makes race the predominant, relevant factor. Every lawyer and judge promises defend and protect the U.S. Constitution but she cannot uphold this oath if she believes that the Constitution and the principals of America’s founding are inherently racist and inherently flawed. Neither can a judge remain impartial and administer judgements independently if she holds a philosophy that correcting racism requires affording privileged oppressed less justice than oppressed classes. Ultimately a judge should consider America’s history as a lesson and a blueprint for why and how we must constantly seek to hold and protect America’s founding promises. For these reasons, First Liberty opposes the nomination and I thank you for the opportunity to testify today.

The Thinking Conservative
The Thinking Conservativehttps://www.thethinkingconservative.com/
The goal of THE THINKING CONSERVATIVE is to help us educate ourselves on conservative topics of importance to our freedom and our pursuit of happiness. We do this by sharing conservative opinions on all kinds of subjects, from all types of people, and all kinds of media, in a way that will challenge our perceptions and help us to make educated choices.

AI Takes Customer Service from Doublespeak to Triplespeak

Corporations are replacing customer service agents with AI agents. Here's a real-life example of attempting to use AI to have my internet restored.

The Left’s Descent into Extremismย ย 

The political left, from mainstream Dems to radical Antifa, have embraced extremism, alienating swaths of the public and undermining their own influence.

Roger Stone Speaks About Trump at Turning Point USA

Longtime Donald Trump friend, Roger Stone, gave a speech at the 2025 TPUSA convention offering his take on the recent Epstein List controversy.

Dredging the Swamp For CNN RINOs

Epstein ran a multinational child sex trafficking ring to service and entrap political and business elites to blackmail and to usurp democratic governance.

Trump Turned His Head And Saved America

It was a turn of President Trump's head to view an immigration chart that saved his life. It was Divine intervention, God saved Trump so he could save America.

Federal Appeals Court Upholds Constitutionality of Gun Bans for Drug Users

Federal appeals court ruled law barring people who regularly use illegal drugs from owning guns is constitutional because of public safety concerns.

Gut Bacteria Could Help Remove โ€˜Forever Chemicalsโ€™ From Body

Researchers found that nine species of gut bacteria can help detoxify the body from forever chemicals, absorbing PFAS linked to cancer and other illnesses.

Trump Urges Supreme Court to Allow Firing of Biden Appointees at Consumer Commission

President Trump urged the Supreme Court on July 14 to lift a lower court order blocking his firing of three Biden appointees at the CPSC.

Jeffrey Epstein’s accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell ready to reveal ‘truth’ of pedophile client list

Ghislaine Maxwell is only person serving time on child sex trafficking despite fact that pedophileย Jeffrey Epsteinย allegedly controlled a web of underage girls.

Trump to Announce $70 Billion Energy and Innovation Investment in Pittsburgh

President Trump is meeting with business leaders to discuss how best to meet the energy and computing needs of the future.

Trump Says He Spoke to Bongino Amid Reports of Infighting Over Epstein Files

President Trump spoke to FBI Deputy Dir. Dan Bongino, indicating the two remain close despite reported friction over release of Jeffrey Epstein docs.

EU Wonโ€™t Retaliate to Trumpโ€™s 30 Percent Tariff, Countermeasures on Hold Until August

EC President Ursula von der Leyen said EU will extend suspension on countermeasures to U.S. tariffs until next month while trade negotiations continue.

Trump Announces 30 Percent Tariff on EU, Mexico

President Donald Trump has announced a 30 percent tariff on imports from the European Union and Mexico, to go into effect on Aug. 1, 2025.
spot_img

Related Articles