Left Is Using Supreme Court Commission to Change Court’s Decisions, Not to Improve It

Contact Your Elected Officials
The Heritage Foundation

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • The left wants a judiciary in general, and a Supreme Court in particular, that is likely to decide cases that will further a leftist political agenda.
  • The list of “reform” ideas that the commission will mull over includes court-packing or, as the White House release puts it, the “membership and size of the Court.”
  • A majority of Americans already believe that the Supreme Court decides cases based on politics rather than the law. This commission will likely worsen that trend.

Today, President Joe Biden signed an executive order creating the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States. The White House announcement and the members chosen for this commission raise serious questions about its real purpose and concerns about its impact on the independence of the judiciary.

The most obvious question is why the Supreme Court needs to be examined at all. The simple answer is that the left wants a judiciary in general, and a Supreme Court in particular, that is likely to decide cases that will further a leftist political agenda.

Results that are politically correct—not judicially correct—are what matter to the left, and the left is not satisfied with the current Supreme Court’s decisions of late. Therefore, it wants to create one in its own image.

One of the reasons America declared independence from Britain, however, was that King George was trying to manipulate the judiciary. The Founders designed our judiciary to be independent from the political branches. The left, on the other hand, sees judicial independence not as a principle to be defended, but as an obstacle to be overcome. This commission is part of its plan to overcome it.

Biden mentioned the idea of appointing a commission to study the courts last October in a “60 Minutes” interview. He was a bit fuzzy, however, about why it was needed, saying only that the courts were “out of whack.”

The White House press release today is similarly vague about this commission’s mandate, saying only that it will analyze “the principal arguments in the contemporary public debate for and against Supreme Court reform.”

Analysis of arguments in an ongoing debate might be useful, but it certainly does not require a presidential commission.

This is only the second commission in the last 50 years to examine the Supreme Court at the behest of a president. In 1975, President Gerald Ford directed Attorney General Edward Levi to appoint such a commission. It had 10 members drawn from within the Justice Department and offered recommendations about matters involving the size, administration, and jurisdiction of the federal courts.

In contrast, the Biden commission has 36 members, none of whom come from the Justice Department, and will evaluate existing reform ideas but not offer any of its own recommendations.

Even so, the list of “reform” ideas that the commission will mull over includes court-packing or, as the White House release puts it, the “membership and size of the Court.”

The Supreme Court has had nine members since 1869 and decides less than half the cases each year as it did a few decades ago. The only reason to expand the court is to create new vacancies that Biden could quickly fill to change how the court decides cases.

Justice Stephen Breyer recently warned against this course, echoing his late colleague Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who said in 2019 that there was no need to change the number of justices.

Left-wing groups, however, have been demanding a judiciary makeover in general, and court-packing in particular, for years. The group Demand Justice, for example, says that “structural” reforms, such as adding four Supreme Court seats, would be “big, bold solutions” to “big, urgent problems.” It also wants term limits for Supreme Court justices, another issue the Biden commission will examine.

Unlike previous commissions, however, the Biden commission includes members who are already on record as favoring some of the very proposals that they will be tasked with examining.

For example, one commission member is Michael Waldman, president of the Brennan Center for Justice. This organization has advocated judicial term limits and changing the method of appointment. It is hard to imagine Waldman examining the pros and cons of these reforms evenly, rather than agree with them as a foregone conclusion.

Harvard Law School Professor Emeritus Laurence Tribe is also on the commission. In his 1985 book “God Save This Honorable Court,” he outlined how the Senate could refuse to confirm any Supreme Court nominee who would not commit to particular rulings on certain constitutional issues.

Tribe also advised Senate Democrats in 2001 as they launched their campaign to filibuster President George W. Bush’s judicial nominations. His partiality, therefore, is in question, to say the least.

Also on the commission is Sherrilyn Ifill, president of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund. Last year, her group signed a letter using the COVID-19 pandemic as an excuse to stop the entire judicial appointment process.

Even without endorsing specific reform ideas, the Biden commission will no doubt achieve some results. Unfortunately, those may include misleading the American people about how the judicial branch is designed to operate.

A majority of Americans already believe that the Supreme Court decides cases based on politics rather than the law. This commission will likely worsen that trend.

By Thomas Jipping

About Thomas Jipping

Thomas Jipping is the Senior Legal Fellow at the Center for Edwin Meese III Legal and Judicial Studies.

This piece originally appeared in The Daily Signal.

The Heritage Foundation
The Heritage Foundationhttps://www.heritage.org/
The Heritage Foundation formulates and promotes public policies based on free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional values, and strong national defense.

Trump’s Middle East Triumph is Worth Celebrating Even As Peace Remains Elusive 

President Trump’s bold foreign policy defies globalist appeasement, showcasing unwavering American strength and decisive leadership on the world stage.

Are conservatives fighting a fiction of woke?

Wokery, it hurts to say it, is too disorganized to have an organized cosmology or doctrine of metaphysical belief.

Illinois Democrat Offenders Reveal Party

The crime of J.B Pritzker and Brandon Johnson in this episode of American history is called subversion at the least , but could be as serious as treason.

Inside the Public School Librarian Jihad to Keep Transgender Propaganda on Shelves

Public school librarians are doing all they can to keep child tranny propaganda flowing directly into the malleable minds of their charges.

Five Reasons Why The Latest Czech Elections Were So Important

Populist-nationalist politician Andrej Babis is poised to return to the premiership after his party's victory. Here are 5 reasons why this is so important.

New York AG Letitia James Indicted on Federal Charges

New York Attorney General Letitia James was indicted by a grand jury on federal charges, according to an indictment on unsealed on Thursday.

6 Ways Vaccine Policy Has Changed Under RFK Jr.

Health Sec RFK, Jr. and officials at the HHS changed recommendations and policies for multiple vaccines, including shots against COVID-19 and measles.

Journalists Recount Antifa Violence in Roundtable With Trump

President Trump met at the White House with journalists attacked by the newly designated terrorist group Antifa, joined by Cabinet officials for a roundtable.

IRS to Furlough 34,000 Employees as Government Shutdown Halts Treasury Operations

The IRS said in an emergency message to staff that it will furlough more than 34,000 employees starting on Oct. 8 due to the government shutdown.

Trump Says He May Invoke Insurrection Act in Portland If Necessary

President Donald Trump on Oct. 6 said he may consider invoking the Insurrection Act in Portland, Oregon, if necessary.

Trump: All Medium, Heavy Duty Trucks Entering US Will See 25 Percent Tariff on Nov. 1

President Trump announced on Monday that all medium and heavy-duty trucks entering the United States will see a 25 percent tariff starting on Nov. 1.

Treasury Names Social Security Commissioner as CEO of IRS

Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent announced that Frank Bisignano, the head of the Social Security Administration (SSA), will also serve as CEO of the IRS.

Agencies Terminated, Descoped 94 Wasteful Contracts With $8.5 Billion Ceiling Value, Says DOGE

Various federal government agencies have terminated and descoped 94 wasteful contracts over the past five days, DOGE said in an Oct. 4 post on X.
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

MAGA Business Central