Left Labeling Election Integrity Reforms As “Jim Crow” Is a Lie and Insulting to Black People

5Mind. The Meme Platform

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  1. It’s insulting that politicians are trying to manipulate Black folks like me into thinking that voting reforms that protect our right to vote are somehow racist.
  2. It’s a scare tactic and an attempt to rally support for a voting bill currently in Congress ironically called the For the People Act, or H.R. 1.
  3. Free and fair elections are the cornerstone of our republic, and every citizen must be able to trust the voting process and its results.

As a Black woman who grew up in the segregated South, I’m shocked and appalled with the race-baiting from mostly White left-wing politicians who are throwing around the “Jim Crow” label to score political points in the debate over strengthening our voting laws.

To paraphrase Lloyd Bentsen’s line from the 1988 vice presidential debate with Dan Quayle: I knew Jim Crow. Jim Crow was no friend of mine. And these common-sense voting laws that states are adopting are no Jim Crow.

Frankly, it’s insulting that politicians are trying to manipulate Black folks like me into thinking that voting reforms that actually protect our right to vote are somehow racist. It’s insulting to be lied to, and—yes, I’m going to say it—it seems awfully racist to be thought of as so ignorant and gullible.

These state election reforms are about one thing—making it easier for American citizens to vote, while making it harder for cheaters to cheat.

Yet everyone from President Joe Biden to The New York Times to Coca-Cola and those in Hollywood are labeling voting reforms adopted in Georgia and other states as voter suppression and the new Jim Crow. There’s even a Senate hearing this week being held around this lie called, “Jim Crow 2021: The Latest Assault on the Right to Vote.”

Growing up as a Black teenager during the 1960s, I knew the tremendous sacrifices and the dangers that my friends and relatives endured to secure the right to vote for Black Americans. I myself was part of the Civil Rights Movement when I was thrust into an effort to desegregate my middle school in Richmond, Va.

So let me be perfectly clear: I have zero interest in disenfranchising or suppressing the vote of any portion of the population.

But that’s not what’s happening in Georgia or other states pursuing election reforms. And don’t let anyone tell you otherwise.

As we’ve heard from the few truth tellers there are in the media, the new Georgia election reform doesn’t discourage voting or suppress votes. In fact, the availability of absentee ballots and early voting is a lot more robust than what it is in most “blue” states.

And Georgia provides a free voter ID to people without ID and has exceptions that mirror federal law. Turnout in the state as well as studies also show that ID requirements don’t suppress votes; and polling shows that voters, including Black voters, agree that voter ID is a common-sense reform. Claims that Black people are somehow unable or unwilling to obtain identification are insulting and have no basis in fact.

“You know what’s racist? Assuming because I’m black that ‘I just don’t have the capability of getting an I-D,’” Rep. Burgess Owens recently tweeted. I couldn’t agree more.

So why is the left calling these reforms racist? It’s a scare tactic and an attempt to rally support for a voting bill currently in Congress ironically called the For the People Act, or H.R. 1.

H.R. 1 would create a federal takeover of elections and force changes to election laws that would actually allow for greater fraud and election tampering. It would diminish the very voting rights that my relatives in the 1960s, the women suffragists of the early 1900s, and the men and women of the armed forces throughout our history fought so hard to gain and protect.

Under H.R. 1, no one has to prove they are who they say they are in order to vote. It’s likely to automatically add ineligible individuals like non-citizens to the voter rolls. And it outlaws or restricts safeguards that help states maintain accurate voter rolls to prevent people from voting twice. In other words, it would allow illegal votes to cancel out our legal ones.

And that’s just scratching the surface of this terrible law.

H.R. 1 isn’t for the people; it’s about creating more power for certain politicians. The people who support this bill expect that most illegal votes will favor left-wing politicians, and they are willing to dilute our legal votes by encouraging more illegal ones.

They are lying and calling common-sense voter protections racist to make people think that there is a groundswell of voter suppression coming from the states so that they can pretend to save us all with H.R. 1. But they aren’t really interested in protecting us; all they are interested in is helping themselves.

The right to vote is one of the most sacred rights that we as free citizens can exercise. That’s why we must protect it and not allow politicians to get away with pushing sinister bills like H.R. 1 that would diminish that right.

Free and fair elections are the cornerstone of our republic, and every citizen—no matter their color, ethnicity, background or political persuasion—must be able to trust the voting process and its results.

The very future of a free nation depends on it.

By Kay C. James, President of The Heritage Foundation and a leader in government, academia and the conservative movement.

Read Original Article on Heritage.org

Contact Your Elected Officials
The Heritage Foundation
The Heritage Foundationhttps://www.heritage.org/
The Heritage Foundation formulates and promotes public policies based on free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional values, and strong national defense.

New Book Warns Failure of Congress to Defend Separation of Powers Fuels Rise of Authoritarianism

The Book Congress: An Irrelevant Institution or Guardian of the Republic argues that Congress's decline threatens the Constitution’s separation of powers.

What Happens to State Sovereignty When Federal Money Stops?

What happens to state sovereignty when the federal government can no longer afford to subsidize 36% of state budgets, on average?

Japanese Nationalists vs. the Replacement Migration Machine

Japan has begun to falter in its resolute refusal to embrace the mass migration regime that international governments and NGOs had demanded it do.

CIA is On Tucker Carlson for Talking to Iran

“They read my text messages” and the Central Intelligence Agency is trying to “frame me as a foreign agent,” alleged Tucker Carlson.

The EU Poses A Much More Credible Threat To Russia Than The Inverse

Unlike back in June 1941, Russia is now a nuclear superpower, and that might be the only factor that deters the EU from invading Russia.

US Prosecutors Say Venezuelan State Funds Should Not Be Used for Maduro’s Defense

Former Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro should not be ‌able to use funds from Caracas to defend himself against narcotics trafficking charges, U.S. prosecutors said.

Judge Temporarily Blocks RFK Jr.’s Vaccine Policy, Panel Overhaul

A federal judge in Massachusetts ruled that Health Sec. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. illegally appointed 13 new members to an influential vaccine panel.

Judge Blocks New CDC Vaccine Schedule: What to Know

A federal judge has temporarily blocked the new Centers for Disease Control and Prevention vaccine schedule for children.

Virginia Democrats Pass Sweeping Agenda in First Trifecta Session but Adjourn Without a Budget

Virginia Democrats ended their first trifecta session, passing bills raising the minimum wage, banning assault firearms, limiting ICE cooperation, and expanding paid leave.

Trump Expects Iran War to End ‘Soon’

President Trump said on March 16 that he believes the U.S.–Israeli war with Iran could be “wrapped up soon,” but its unlikely to end within the week.

Trump Puts China Visit on Hold Amid Iran War

As the Iran war continues, President Donald Trump said he would delay his long-awaited trip to Beijing, originally set for the end of this month.

White House Outlines Vision for Underground Visitor Screening Facility

The 33,000-square-foot facility proposed beneath Sherman Park would process visitors entering the White House and could open by mid-2028 if approved.

Trump Signs Order Assigning Vance to Head Anti-Fraud Task Force

President Donald Trump signed an executive order on March 16, officially creating an anti-fraud task force headed by Vice President JD Vance.
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

MAGA Business Central