‘Science, Yes; Scientism, No’ delivered by Distinguished Professor Susan Haack upon receipt of the UCD Ulysses Medal, 22 September 2016.
About Prof Susan Haack
A robust defender of the ability of science to advance the collective sphere of human knowledge and inquiry, Professor Susan Haack has been awarded the Ulysses medal by University College Dublin.
Professor Haack received the Ulysees medal in recognition of her outstanding contribution to the arts, in particular philosophy, and law.
Professor Haack’s scholarship focuses on the philosophy of logic and language, epistemology – theory of knowledge – philosophy of science, the law of evidence, feminism and philosophy of literature.
Arguably her most important contribution to philosophy is ‘Evidence and Inquiry’, published in 1993, in which she outlines the epistemological theory – theory of knowledge – of foundherentism.
Foundherentism holds that it is permissible to include the relevance of experience when justifying empirical evidence.
“Profesor Haack is also a superb commentator on social cultural and academic affairs. In sparklingly clear and frequently witty prose, Haack shows that, and how, philosophy should engage with issues in the academy and beyond,” said Dr Tim Crowley, Assistant Professor, UCD School of Philosophy.
Professor Haack is Distinguished Professor in the Humanities, Cooper Senior Scholar in Arts and Sciences, Professor of Philosophy, and Professor of Law at the University of Miami.
Born in England, she took her BPhil at the University of Oxford, and PhD at the University of Cambridge. She held teaching positions at the University of Cambridge and the University of Warwick, before moving to the University of Miami in 1990.
Among her seven published books is her 1998 collection of writings, ‘Manifesto of A Passionate Moderate’. In the essays, Haack rails against the ‘New Cynics’ – including radical feminists and multiculturalists – who disputed the idea of scientific knowledge as worthy of pursuit.
The work challenges the “great revolutionary chorus announcing that disinterested inquiry is impossible…that the concepts of evidence, objectivity, truth are ideological humbug”.
In ‘Defending Science – Within Reason: Between Scientism and Cynicism’, published in 2003, Professor Haack developed her theories in this area further. She argued that the natural sciences have been among the most successful of human endeavours.
She held that the sciences are valuable for the vast body of knowledge they have discovered, as well as the technological advances that have improved the lives of human beings. But, more importantly, she argued that science is a manifestation of the human talent for inquiry at its best.
Professor Haack has more recently applied the fruits of these enquiries to the philosophy of law.
In her 2014 book, ‘Evidence Matters Science, Proof, and Truth in the Law’, she brings her original and distinctive work in the theory of knowledge and philosophy of science to bear on real-life legal issues.
By providing detailed analyses on a wide variety of legal cases, she attempts to clarify the proper role of scientific evidence and interpretation of standards of proof in the law.
The English academic was included in Peter J. King’s ‘One Hundred Philosophers: The Life and Work of the World’s Greatest Thinkers’ – one of the handful of living philosophers so honoured.
She has also been honoured for excellence in teaching, by the American Philosophical Association, and the University of Miami; for excellence in research (the Provost’s Award, Miami), and for excellence in writing (the Forkosch Award).
