Social Media-Government Censorship

Contact Your Elected Officials

It has been going on since the COVID-19 Pandemic. The federal government, along with large tech-media companies, have apparently colluded in an effort to censor Americans.

President Trump in an effort to right this wrong, is issuing executive decisions designed to undermine this toxic duplicity before Americans lose all their trust in the media and the government.

Americans have complicated feelings about their relationship with โ€œBig Tech.โ€ While they have appreciated the impact of technology over recent decades, many have also grown critical of the industry with concerns about the executives who run them.

A contentious issue in politics, critics accuse tech firms of political bias and stifling open discussion. Amid these concerns, Pew Research found that about three-quarters of U.S. adults say it is very (37%) or somewhat (36%) likely that social-media sites intentionally censor political viewpoints they find objectionable.

The survey notes that the public is about evenly divided on the issue of โ€œfact checking,โ€ with little confidence that these platforms could determine which content should be flagged.

Partisanship is a key factor in views about the issue. Fully 73% of Democrats say they (strongly or somewhat) approve of social media companies labeling posts as inaccurate or misleading. On the other hand, 71% of Republicans say they at least (somewhat disapprove) of this practice.

Reacting to President Trump’s professed determination to disrupt this destructive culture of public-private collaboration against Americans, โ€œBig Techโ€ has made a U-turn in its policies. No longer will it play the role of โ€œdivine seerโ€ with regard to what is and is not โ€œthe truth.โ€

Meta is getting rid of โ€œfact checkers.โ€

โ€œFact checkers have been too politically biased and have destroyed more trust than theyโ€™ve created,โ€ Zuckerberg said last week. โ€œWhat started as a movement to be more inclusive has increasingly been used to shut down opinions and shut out people with different ideas, and itโ€™s gone too far.โ€

The decision likely has something to do with Metaโ€™s recent negotiated settlement with Donald Trump. Zuckerberg has agreed to settle with the president after the latter accused the company of violating his rights by suspending his social media accounts following the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.

Meta will be making a donation of $22 million to Trump’s presidential library and paying $3 million in legal fees.

President Trump, however, has also pointed his executive pen towards the federal government. He ordered that no federal officer, employee or agent may unconstitutionally abridge the free speech of any American citizen.

The presidentโ€™s executive order comes after Trump accused the federal government of pressuring social media companies to take down lawful posts, allegedly containing โ€œmisinformation.โ€

It should be noted that the federal government has been complicit in censorship since 1798, when John Adams signed a bill that made it illegal to even criticize a government official without proving one’s criticisms in court.

The situation is not that different today, 226 years later. The federal government has been intimately involved in efforts to censor not only American citizens but any speech it felt was inconsistent with its conceptualization of โ€œthe truth,โ€ especially during the COVID-19 Pandemic era and since then.

Consider this headline in 2023 from Reason.com, โ€œThe 5th Circuit Agrees That Federal Officials Unconstitutionally ‘Coerced’ or ‘Encouraged’ Online Censorship.โ€

A three-judge panel of the 5th Circuit unanimouslyagreed that the White House, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the FBI had “coerced” or “significantly encouraged” the platforms, “in violation of the First Amendment,” to suppress speech that federal officials viewed as โ€œdangerouslyโ€ inaccurate or misleading.

The 5th Circuit notes in a per curiam opinion that “a group of federal officials has been in regular contact with nearly every major American social-media company about the spread of โ€œmisinformationโ€ on their platforms. In their concern, those officials โ€“ hailing from the White House, the CDC, the FBI, and a few other agencies โ€“ urged the platforms to remove disfavored content and accounts from their sites.”

The court concluded, “the platforms seemingly complied. They gave the officials access to an expedited reporting system, downgraded or removed flagged posts, and deplatformed users. The platforms also changed their internal policies to capture more flagged content and sent steady reports on their moderation activities to the officials. That went on through the COVID-19 pandemic [and] the 2022 congressional election, and continues to this day.โ€

The government apparently decided that the First Amendment didn’t apply to them. It flaunted federal laws protecting free speech as well as those against conspiracies to abridge the rights of citizens. It abused the federal power of its high office to pressure companies, threatening repercussions if they refused to comply.

There appears to be this idea that the Fifth Amendmentโ€™s โ€œright to due processโ€ need not be acknowledged by the government. There was none in the censorship regime that was invoked by its perpetrators.

There are specific federal statutes — 18 U.S. Code ยง241 and ยง242 โ€“ that speak to these prohibitions. The first applies to federal government employees, and the second applies to private actors, concerning what is called โ€œdeprivation of rightsโ€ and โ€œconspiracy to deprive rights.โ€

It is not legal under the U.S. Criminal Code for government employees or private entities to engage in a conspiracy to deprive people of their constitutional rights. The Fifth Circuit was clear โ€“ the government employees involved were way over the line. As for the media (tech) companies, those on the โ€˜leftโ€™ pose the question of whether they are victims or perpetrators — or both. They will, of course, argue that they are victims only โ€“ the downstream subjects of pressure, not the cause.

But the statutes and the Fifth Circuit are clear โ€“ the government cannot exert any kind of pressure, even soft pressure, on companies to censor.

It’s against federal law.

The right to free speech is a long-standing tradition in the United States, unfortunately, respecting the right to free speech is not.

F. Andrew Wolf, Jr.
F. Andrew Wolf, Jr.
F. Andrew Wolf, Jr. is a retired USAF Lt. Col. and retired university professor of the Humanities, Philosophy of Religion and Philosophy. His education includes a PhD in philosophy from Univ. of Wales, two masters degrees (MTh-Texas Christian Univ.), (MA-Univ. South Africa) and an abiding passion for what is in America's best interest.

Donald Trumpโ€™s Appointments Are Being Obstructed

Donald Trump is the only President in history that has had recess appointments blocked by his own party!

Trump Flag-Burning Ban: Unconstitutional, Un-American, and Trifling

Trump signed an EO to criminalize the burning of the American flag โ€” the right to do which having already been adjudicated by the highest court in the land.

Using True Facts of History to Determine What is Right and What is Wrong

The amount of time separating a human act from a truthful description of it is not as important as the veracity of historians bringing it to light.

The Very British Stalemate: British Politics Explained for Americans

The assumption in the minds of American commentators, politicians, and analysts is that the UK has "gone to the dogs" with "woke" political ideology.

NFL Vikings Male Cheerleader Controversy ย 

The NFL under the leadership of Roger Goodell is back to yet another controversy that is causing backlash and a possible boycott.

Trump Moves to Fire Fedโ€™s Lisa Cookโ€”Here Are 4 Takeaways

President Donald Trump announced in an Aug. 25 letter that he is firing Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook over mortgage fraud allegations.

Cracker Barrel to Return to Its Old Logo

Cracker Barrel will go back to its old logo following a public outcry over a new logo unveiled last week, the restaurant announced Aug. 26.

Ohio Bill Would Legalize Direct Sales of Raw Milk From Farms

Two Ohio state lawmakers have introduced a bill that would make it easier for people to buy raw milk, describing it as a โ€œmatter of liberty.โ€

HHS Threatens to Cut Funds for 46 States Over Gender Ideology in School Curricula

HHS ordered 46 U.S. states and territories to remove all educational references to gender ideology from federally funded school grant programs within 60 days.

RFK Jr. Says HHS Will Disclose Causes of Autism in September

During a cabinet meeting Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. vowed to announce the causes of autism by September.

OMB Head: Trump Admin Eliminating 30 Old Regulations for Each New One

The Trump administration has repealed 30 regulations for each new regulation, Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought announced.

FDA Ramps Up Inspections of Shrimp Amid Radioactive Contamination Reports, RFK Jr. Confirms

Health Sec RFK, Jr. said federal health authorities are looking at imported shrimp after FDA issued warnings after potentially radioactive shrimp.

Trump Says He Wonโ€™t Send Guard to Chicago Until He Gets Request From Illinois Governor

President Trump said heโ€™s not going to send any federal troops to assist with law enforcement in Chicago until he gets a request from Gov. JB Pritzker.
spot_img

Related Articles