Social Media-Government Censorship

Contact Your Elected Officials

It has been going on since the COVID-19 Pandemic. The federal government, along with large tech-media companies, have apparently colluded in an effort to censor Americans.

President Trump in an effort to right this wrong, is issuing executive decisions designed to undermine this toxic duplicity before Americans lose all their trust in the media and the government.

Americans have complicated feelings about their relationship with โ€œBig Tech.โ€ While they have appreciated the impact of technology over recent decades, many have also grown critical of the industry with concerns about the executives who run them.

A contentious issue in politics, critics accuse tech firms of political bias and stifling open discussion. Amid these concerns, Pew Research found that about three-quarters of U.S. adults say it is very (37%) or somewhat (36%) likely that social-media sites intentionally censor political viewpoints they find objectionable.

The survey notes that the public is about evenly divided on the issue of โ€œfact checking,โ€ with little confidence that these platforms could determine which content should be flagged.

Partisanship is a key factor in views about the issue. Fully 73% of Democrats say they (strongly or somewhat) approve of social media companies labeling posts as inaccurate or misleading. On the other hand, 71% of Republicans say they at least (somewhat disapprove) of this practice.

Reacting to President Trump’s professed determination to disrupt this destructive culture of public-private collaboration against Americans, โ€œBig Techโ€ has made a U-turn in its policies. No longer will it play the role of โ€œdivine seerโ€ with regard to what is and is not โ€œthe truth.โ€

Meta is getting rid of โ€œfact checkers.โ€

โ€œFact checkers have been too politically biased and have destroyed more trust than theyโ€™ve created,โ€ Zuckerberg said last week. โ€œWhat started as a movement to be more inclusive has increasingly been used to shut down opinions and shut out people with different ideas, and itโ€™s gone too far.โ€

The decision likely has something to do with Metaโ€™s recent negotiated settlement with Donald Trump. Zuckerberg has agreed to settle with the president after the latter accused the company of violating his rights by suspending his social media accounts following the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.

Meta will be making a donation of $22 million to Trump’s presidential library and paying $3 million in legal fees.

President Trump, however, has also pointed his executive pen towards the federal government. He ordered that no federal officer, employee or agent may unconstitutionally abridge the free speech of any American citizen.

The presidentโ€™s executive order comes after Trump accused the federal government of pressuring social media companies to take down lawful posts, allegedly containing โ€œmisinformation.โ€

It should be noted that the federal government has been complicit in censorship since 1798, when John Adams signed a bill that made it illegal to even criticize a government official without proving one’s criticisms in court.

The situation is not that different today, 226 years later. The federal government has been intimately involved in efforts to censor not only American citizens but any speech it felt was inconsistent with its conceptualization of โ€œthe truth,โ€ especially during the COVID-19 Pandemic era and since then.

Consider this headline in 2023 from Reason.com, โ€œThe 5th Circuit Agrees That Federal Officials Unconstitutionally ‘Coerced’ or ‘Encouraged’ Online Censorship.โ€

A three-judge panel of the 5th Circuit unanimouslyagreed that the White House, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the FBI had “coerced” or “significantly encouraged” the platforms, “in violation of the First Amendment,” to suppress speech that federal officials viewed as โ€œdangerouslyโ€ inaccurate or misleading.

The 5th Circuit notes in a per curiam opinion that “a group of federal officials has been in regular contact with nearly every major American social-media company about the spread of โ€œmisinformationโ€ on their platforms. In their concern, those officials โ€“ hailing from the White House, the CDC, the FBI, and a few other agencies โ€“ urged the platforms to remove disfavored content and accounts from their sites.”

The court concluded, “the platforms seemingly complied. They gave the officials access to an expedited reporting system, downgraded or removed flagged posts, and deplatformed users. The platforms also changed their internal policies to capture more flagged content and sent steady reports on their moderation activities to the officials. That went on through the COVID-19 pandemic [and] the 2022 congressional election, and continues to this day.โ€

The government apparently decided that the First Amendment didn’t apply to them. It flaunted federal laws protecting free speech as well as those against conspiracies to abridge the rights of citizens. It abused the federal power of its high office to pressure companies, threatening repercussions if they refused to comply.

There appears to be this idea that the Fifth Amendmentโ€™s โ€œright to due processโ€ need not be acknowledged by the government. There was none in the censorship regime that was invoked by its perpetrators.

There are specific federal statutes — 18 U.S. Code ยง241 and ยง242 โ€“ that speak to these prohibitions. The first applies to federal government employees, and the second applies to private actors, concerning what is called โ€œdeprivation of rightsโ€ and โ€œconspiracy to deprive rights.โ€

It is not legal under the U.S. Criminal Code for government employees or private entities to engage in a conspiracy to deprive people of their constitutional rights. The Fifth Circuit was clear โ€“ the government employees involved were way over the line. As for the media (tech) companies, those on the โ€˜leftโ€™ pose the question of whether they are victims or perpetrators — or both. They will, of course, argue that they are victims only โ€“ the downstream subjects of pressure, not the cause.

But the statutes and the Fifth Circuit are clear โ€“ the government cannot exert any kind of pressure, even soft pressure, on companies to censor.

It’s against federal law.

The right to free speech is a long-standing tradition in the United States, unfortunately, respecting the right to free speech is not.

F. Andrew Wolf, Jr.
F. Andrew Wolf, Jr.
F. Andrew Wolf, Jr. is a retired USAF Lt. Col. and retired university professor of the Humanities, Philosophy of Religion and Philosophy. His education includes a PhD in philosophy from Univ. of Wales, two masters degrees (MTh-Texas Christian Univ.), (MA-Univ. South Africa) and an abiding passion for what is in America's best interest.

Lay Democrats to Waste, Post Truths in Cut and Paste!

Senator John Kennedy (R-LA) humorously stated, โ€œOur secret plan for dealing with the Democrats is called, โ€˜Operation: Let them speak.โ€™โ€

Congress doesnโ€™t Care What the Average Person Thinks

In researching voting rights issues, a study provides a foundation for the statement โ€œgovernment officials donโ€™t care what people like them think.โ€

Domestic Terrorists Rain Adult Toys on WNBA Courts in Multiple Aerial Assaults

In what might be described as the worst terrorist attack on American soil since 9/11, multiple WNBA courts have been pelted with brutal flying missiles.

Democrats Are In Disastrous Shape As Midterms Loom

According to CNN's Harry Enten, โ€œThe Democratic brand is in the basement. It is total and complete garbage in the mind of the American public.โ€

A Primer on Conservatism

Conservatism is based on the maintenance and preservation of economic and governmental liberty of the individual citizen to choose what is best for their interests.

Google to Limit Use of AI Data Center Power During Grid Peaks

Global tech giant Google has just signed agreements with utility firms I&M and the TVA to reduce power use at its AI data centers when demand surges.

Lay Democrats to Waste, Post Truths in Cut and Paste!

Senator John Kennedy (R-LA) humorously stated, โ€œOur secret plan for dealing with the Democrats is called, โ€˜Operation: Let them speak.โ€™โ€

Data Centers, AI Infrastructure to Boost Electricity Sales by 175 Percent

Driven by new data centers and AI infrastructure, retail electricity sales to consumers in US are expected to grow at an annual rate of 2.2% in 2025 and 2026.

US Sanctions 5 Foreign Entities for Allegedly Aiding Iranian Military Drone Program

Treasury Dept sanctioned entities and individual based in Iran, China, Taiwan, and HK for aiding Iranโ€™s military aircraft and drone company to procure tech.

Trump Vows to โ€˜Substantially Raise Tariffโ€™ on India Over Russian Oil Imports

Trump said he would โ€œsubstantiallyโ€ raise tariffs on goods from India, citing countryโ€™s continued purchase of Russian oil despite his demand that it stop.

European Union Suspends US Tariff Countermeasures for 6 Months

The EU will suspend its two packages of countermeasures to U.S. tariffs for six months, a European Commission spokesman said on Monday.

Trump Says Americans Could Get Dividends From Tariff Revenues

President Donald Trump suggested on Sunday that his administration could distribute dividends from tariff revenues to Americans with certain income levels.

Tariff Rates โ€˜Pretty Much Set,โ€™ Says US Trade Representative

President Trumpโ€™s trade representative, Jamieson Greer, said that Americans should expect the administrationโ€™s tariff levels to remain where they are.
spot_img

Related Articles