Supreme Court Ends EPA’s Climate Change Reign of Terror

Contact Your Elected Officials

The decades-long, push by EPA and environmentalists (“environmental community”) to impose a comprehensive and costly regulatory structure to address climate change ended with the Supreme Court’s ruling in West Virginia vs Environmental Protection Agency (“WVA v. EPA”). The court reaffirmed the legislative power of Congress that was undermined by the environmental community’s coordinated campaign of litigation, Executive Orders, and rulemaking to create laws without Congress.

By formally announcing the “Major Question Doctrine,” the court made clear that regulatory agencies can only act on matters of economic and political significance if the agency… point[s] to “clear congressional authority.”

While the Supreme Court could have resolved the controversy (EPA’s “new found authority” to impose a cap-and-trade scheme for carbon emissions) using statutory construction, it recognized agencies were finding “vague language of a long-extant, but rarely used, statute[s]” as authority to regulate major economic and political issues without congressional authorization. The climate debate was the perfect set of facts for clarifying the roles of Congress and agencies.

Congress consistently rejected climate legislation

The court noted, “Congress, however, has consistently rejected proposals to amend the Clean Air Act to create such a program [regulating climate change].” It cited the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009, the Clean Energy Jobs and American Power Act of 2009, the Climate Protection Act of 2011, and Save our Climate Act of 2011. There were many more failed attempts by the environmental community to enact a comprehensive legal structure to address climate change: The Kyoto Protocol (Senate voted 95-0 against ratification), The Paris Agreement (Lacking votes, it was never submitted as a Treaty); McCain-Lieberman, Kerry-Lieberman-Graham, and others that never received a vote. Congress clearly spoke.

Efforts to make law by litigation

Realizing Congress would not impose a massive climate change scheme on American society, the environmental community orchestrated a nationwide litigation campaign to persuade courts to impose such a system. It filed lawsuits across the nation under any statute that might relate to climate change – Clean Air Act, (186), Endangered Species and other wildlife statutes (174), National Environmental Protection Act (322), Clean Water Act (58), miscellaneous land use statutes (168), constitutional claims under the Commerce Clause (20), First, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments (41); under state laws (464), common law (29), public trust (27) and securities and financial statutes (24). The environmental community had some successes, however, its overreach ended in a defeat for the administrative state.

Using Executive Orders to make climate law

On Biden’s first day in office, he issued several Executive Orders to address climate change. Biden further directed all executive departments to place a moratorium on oil and gas leasing programs and establish the Social Cost of Carbon to justify the high cost of the regulatory structure. A week later, Biden ordered a whole-of-government approach to address climate change. This order was followed by the SEC’s proposed climate disclosure rules which again raise the question of identifying the needed congressional authority.

The futile march to circumvent Congress ends

As the environmental community was suffering legislative defeat after defeat, Obama’s EPA issued an “endangerment finding” that greenhouse gases contributed to man-made climate change that may endanger public health and welfare.  This finding served as the foundation for EPA’s Clean Power Plan (“CPP”) regulations, the issue decided in WVA v. EPA.  The CPP was a cap-and-trade rule. President Trump repealed the CPP and put in its place the Affordable Clean Energy rule that limited EPA’s regulatory power to available emission reduction technologies, consistent with the Clean Air Act. On Trump’s last day in office the DC Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the Trump rule, however, before President Biden could reinstate a new CPP rule, the Supreme Court accepted the case for review.

The Supreme Court establishes regulatory sanity

While the Supreme Court held “Congress could not have intended to delegate a decision of such economic and political significance (regulation of climate change) to an agency [EPA] in so cryptic of a fashion,” its decision limits the regulatory power of all agencies to enact major political and economic matters unless the agency can point to “clear congressional authority.”

Had the environmental community been successful in expanding the authority of agencies to regulate climate change without statutory authorization, many agencies would search for and find “long-extant authorities” to further diminish the role of Congress. By reaffirming the constitutional powers of Congress, and placing limits on the Executive’s power to legislate using the rulemaking process, the Supreme Court also solidified its role as a co-equal branch of our government.

The most gratifying aspect of the long battle over the power of EPA to regulate climate change is the ironic ending to the struggle. In the end, EPA’s aggressive regulatory overreach resulted in limits being placed on the regulatory powers of all federal agencies.

William Kovacs
William Kovacshttps://www.reformthekakistocracy.com/
William Kovacs served as senior vice-president for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce chief-counsel to a congressional committee; chairman of a state environmental regulatory board; and a partner in law D.C. law firms. He is the author of Reform the Kakistocracy: Rule by the Least Able or Least Principled Citizens, winner of the 2021 Independent Press Award for Social/Political Change.

The Kirk Assassination Narrative is Falling Apart

New footage challenges the FBI’s claim that Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk from a UVU rooftop with a .30-06 rifle, casting doubt on the official narrative.

A self-inflicted wound

Leftist propaganda from media, unions, bureaucrats, and schools has indoctrinated the marginalized with an idealized view of socialism and communism.

Katie Porter Syndrome: Toxic Feminism 101

“Katie Porter Syndrome” is a pathology inflicted upon Congressional staffers, the media, and, if the patient gets herself elected governor, all of CA.

The Unique European Social Contract: Effectiveness Over Values

American conservatives often ground their political stances on social issues. The European conversation centers on an effectiveness assessment.

Trump’s Middle East Triumph is Worth Celebrating Even As Peace Remains Elusive 

President Trump’s bold foreign policy defies globalist appeasement, showcasing unwavering American strength and decisive leadership on the world stage.

Trump Set to Become 4th President to Address Israel’s Parliament–What to Know

‘The visit of the U.S. president ... is accompanied by great emotion and expectation,’ an Israeli Ministry of Defense official said.

Supreme Court Won’t Hear Project Veritas Challenge to State Law Blocking Secret Recording

U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear a First Amendment challenge from investigative journalism group against Oregon’s ban on secret recordings.

Katie Porter Syndrome: Toxic Feminism 101

“Katie Porter Syndrome” is a pathology inflicted upon Congressional staffers, the media, and, if the patient gets herself elected governor, all of CA.

Biden Undergoing Radiation, Hormone Treatment for Prostate Cancer

Former President Biden has begun receiving a combination of radiation and hormone treatments for prostate cancer, spokesperson announced.

Trump Names Longtime Adviser Dan Scavino to Key Personnel Position

One of President Trump’s longtime advisers, Dan Scavino, is going to be in charge of selecting and appointing key positions within the executive branch.

First Lady’s Effort Helped Reunite 8 War-Displaced Children With Their Families

First lady Melania Trump said 8 children impacted by the fighting between Ukraine and Russia were reunited with their families on Oct. 9.

Trump Admin Agrees to $20 Billion Rescue Plan for Argentina

The U.S. government has finalized a $20 billion economic rescue plan for Argentina, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced on Oct. 9.

Trump Says He May Invoke Insurrection Act in Portland If Necessary

President Donald Trump on Oct. 6 said he may consider invoking the Insurrection Act in Portland, Oregon, if necessary.
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

MAGA Business Central