The Case for Trump … by Someone Who Wants Him to Lose

5Mind. The Meme Platform
The New York Times Header

Barring a political miracle or an act of God, it is overwhelmingly likely that Donald Trump will again be the Republican Party’s nominee for president. Assuming the Democratic nominee in the fall is Joe Biden, polls show Trump with a better-than-even chance of returning to the White House next year.

Lord help us. What should those of us who have consistently opposed him do?

You can’t defeat an opponent if you refuse to understand what makes him formidable. Too many people, especially progressives, fail to think deeply about the enduring sources of his appeal — and to do so without calling him names, or disparaging his supporters, or attributing his resurgence to nefarious foreign actors or the unfairness of the Electoral College. Since I will spend the coming year strenuously opposing his candidacy, let me here make the best case for Trump that I can.

Begin with fundamentals. Trump got three big things right — or at least more right than wrong.

Arguably the single most important geopolitical fact of the century is the mass migration of people from south to north and east to west, causing tectonic demographic, cultural, economic, and ultimately political shifts. Trump understood this from the start of his presidential candidacy in 2015, the same year Europe was overwhelmed by a largely uncontrolled migration from the Middle East and Africa. As he said: “A nation without borders is not a nation at all. We must have a wall. The rule of law matters!”

Many of Trump’s opponents refuse to see virtually unchecked migration as a problem for the West at all. Some of them see it as an opportunity to demonstrate their humanitarianism. Others look at it as an inexhaustible source of cheap labor. They also have the habit of denouncing those who disagree with them as racists. But enforcing control at the border — whether through a wall, a fence, or some other mechanism — isn’t racism. It’s a basic requirement of statehood and peoplehood, which any nation has an obligation to protect and cherish.

Only now, as the consequences of Biden’s lackadaisical approach to mass migration have become depressingly obvious on the sidewalks and in the shelters and public schools of liberal cities like New York and Chicago, are Trump’s opponents on this issue beginning to see the point. Public services paid by taxes exist for people who live here, not just anyone who makes his way into the country by violating its laws. A job market is structured by rules and regulations, not just an endless supply of desperate laborers prepared to work longer for less. A national culture is sustained by common memories, ideals, laws and a language — which newcomers should honor, adopt and learn as a requirement of entry. It isn’t just a giant arrival gate for anyone and everyone who wants to take advantage of American abundance and generosity.

By Brett Stephens

Read Full Article on NYTimes.com

Read Full Article

Contact Your Elected Officials
The New York Times
The New York Timeshttps://www.nytimes.com/
The New York Times brings you unparalleled access to the people and events shaping our world today. we tell stories In a range of formats to fit your lifestyle.

The Party Of Hate Is Unleashing Political Violence

Sec. Scott Bessent placed blame for violence against President Trump squarely on the Democrat Party who are “normalizing this violence. It’s got to stop.”

‘Radical Right’ Restore Britain: The Remigration Dream Machine?

There is nothing wrong with being white, male, or straight—you are not the problem. The issue lies in systems, not individuals, and flawed DEI policies.

Trump 2.0’s Grand Strategy Against China Is Slowly But Surely Coming Together

Casual observers think Trump acts without strategy, but Trump 2.0 is steadily executing a calculated plan aimed at countering China’s global rise.

From legacy to liability

"When the Washington Post cut a third of its shrinking staff, leaders called it 'strategic restructuring'—like calling an iceberg a 'necessary pivot.'!"

The SCOTUS Trump Tariff Test

There is an old expression that goes "If you're...

Judge Says Jack Smith’s Final Report on Trump Can Never Be Released

A federal judge on Feb. 23 said that the final report on President Donald Trump compiled by a former special counsel shall not be released.

US Wins Its Record 11th Gold Medal at Winter Olympics

The U.S. Olympic team secured a record 11th Winter Games gold and could add another as men’s hockey faces Canada in the closing title final game.

Secret Service Agents Fatally Shoot Man Trying to Unlawfully Enter Mar-a-Lago

A man was shot and killed by Secret Service agents after allegedly trying to breach a secure perimeter at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago.

Documents Confirm JPMorgan Closed Trump’s Bank Accounts After Jan. 6 Capitol Breach

Court docs reveal JPMorgan Chase informed President Trump one month after the January 2021 U.S. Capitol breach it would close his accounts.

US Trade Representative Says Nations Are Not Backing Out of Tariff Deals

U.S. trading partners who made deals under Trump show no plans to exit, even after the Supreme Court struck down most of his tariffs.

DOJ Fires Interim US Attorney Hours After Virginia Court Selects Him

The DOJ announced it fired the interim U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia just hours after judges on the court made the appointment.

Trump Admin Says Courts Need to Act on Tariff Refunds After Supreme Court Ruling

The White House is awaiting court guidance on tariff refunds after the Supreme Court struck down several import levies last week.

Supreme Court Ruling on Tariffs Won’t Change US–China Trade Relations, Analysts

After the Supreme Court ruled Trump’s IEEPA tariffs unlawful, analysts say U.S.-China trade likely won’t change, as other legal levy options remain.
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

MAGA Business Central