The U.S. Should Not Assume It Has the Luxury of Time in Its Confrontation With China

Contact Your Elected Officials
The Epoch Times Header

The growing crisis over the Chinese regimeโ€™s threats against Taiwan requires the United States to recognize that Beijing may move against Taipei in the immediate term.

U.S. decision makers consistently have mischaracterized or misperceived Chinaโ€™s strategic timelineโ€”believing it to be a long-term strategic timeline, one that will be realized over many decades and generations. This is due to two causes.

First, there is a common misunderstanding and misinterpretation of classical Chinese strategic texts as decision makers likely possess only a passing acquaintance with the Chinese strategic canon. Of greatest familiarity is Sun Tzuโ€™s often paraphrased observation that to win without fighting is the acme of strategy. In fact, that text, and the others that comprise Chinaโ€™s corpus of the strategic thought, advocate for an immediacy of action that is far from supine or insouciantโ€”allowing events to developโ€”or artfully maneuver your opponent to his downfall.

Second, the conception of passivity and Methuselah-like temporal perspective is advanced by Beijingโ€™s leadership to Washington and other leaders to promote threat deflation, and thus prevent an effective response to arrest or prevent its expanding power or a rapid move against Taiwan. The image, well cultivated by Chinese Communist Partyโ€™s (CCP) leadership since Deng Xiaoping, is of a passive China that possesses a purportedly long-term strategic timeline. As current Party leader Xi Jinping has stated, the CCPโ€™s goals will be realized by 2049โ€”the centenary of the communist revolution. This image of China implies that immediate, comprehensive, and sustained action is not necessary to balance its growing power. Indeed, for this perspective, as Beijing is waiting in the wings with no immediate influence on global politics or existential danger to U.S. national security in the Indo-Pacific, there will be enough time in the future to address the threat posed by its inexorably growing strength.

This approach resulted in two tremendous successes for the CCP leadership. First, U.S. national security decision makers failed to prevent Chinaโ€™s rise when it might have been aborted in the wake of the Tiananmen Square massacre and in the first half of the 1990s. Second, they failed to slow Chinaโ€™s economic growth over the last decades when U.S. and Western capital, knowledge, and manufacturing flowed into China, and Chinese researchers were welcomed into Western businesses, laboratories, and universities.

Rather than confronting the greatest challenge to American power, U.S. defense decision makers are now faced with the dispositive strategic question of the 21st century: Will China or the Western liberal order dominate? Quite possibly, the CCP may achieve an even greater victory if the United States fails to win this struggle. The root of such a failure would be grounded in false assumptions regarding time.

The United States must possess an accurate understanding of Chinaโ€™s short strategic timeline for five reasons. First, to ensure the liberal order is sustained. Regrettably, rather than confronting the issue of Chinaโ€™s rise, lesser U.S. strategic problems, for example, in Southwest Asia, became elevated in importance for U.S. decision makers. In turn, this had a distortive effect on an accurate perception of great power threats and existential threats to U.S. security and position in the world. What flowered from this misperception is the poisonous and dangerous conception that China will wait to achieve its objectives. When the empirical record of Chinaโ€™s behavior is examined, the regime behaves in accord with an immediate and truncated strategic timeline. CCP leaders have been experts at deceiving U.S. national security leadership for decades. U.S. misperceptions must be corrected now.

The second reason the Chinese regimeโ€™s conception of its strategic timeline is centrally important to understand is that it is not willing to allow events to develop in their own course, that is, allowing the propensity of events to develop. The Chinese will be more willing to force changes in the status quo, from territorial disputes in the South China Sea, to economic matters, to military conflict such as over Taiwan. Thus, identifying and understanding that the regime possesses a short strategic timeline is critical for the United States, and offers the United States an understanding of how the Chinese may act against U.S. interests in a period of intense security competition.

Third, this accurate understanding of the regimeโ€™s timeline compels the recognition that the Chinese will act to force change in the present international order. For the United States, the Chinese strategic timeline must be understood to promote the interests of the United States in the Indo-Pacific and globally. This includes laboring to deter likely aggression from China, and relatedly to deterrence, anticipate and prepare for conflict with China so long as the CCP is in control.

Fourth, if provided with windows of opportunity, the Chinese regime will exploit them. Thus, U.S. decision makers must be cognizant of political and military changes that will provide an opportunity from the perspective of the Chinese. The focus of the United States on the Middle East in recent decades has had a high opportunity cost in the confrontation with China, and provided Beijing with a window of opportunity to continue its rise and expand in the South China Sea without balancing from the United States.

Fifth, as the CCP under Xi possesses a truncated strategic timeline, the United States should expect that Beijing will act to advance its strategic objectives immediately, consistently, and with determination. An assumption that the United States will not have to confront the Chinese regime until the mid-2020s, or even in the subsequent decade, or longer, is profoundly mistaken. The confrontation is present now, Taiwan is an acute example, and should be expected only to intensify. The time for the United States and its allies to act is now.

By Bradley A. Thayer

Read Original Article on TheEpochTimes.com

War Room Header

Bradley Thayer, columnist for the Epoch Times, talks about the narrowing window the West has to deal with the threat of China before the Xi Jinping regime makes its move against Taiwan. His latest article above deals with this topic.

โ€œIn perspective, we can be talking about weeks, we can be talking about months, we can be talking about a year in terms of Chinese action. โ€ฆ We need to recognize that the Chinese are already applying coercion against Taiwan, and we should certainly expect that very soon โ€” like weeks, months, a year, โ€” those coercive measures are going to tighten as they try to strangle Taiwan. That may be measures short of invasion โ€ฆ but we need to recognize that they are going to move precipitously.โ€

U.S. Running Out Of Time In Addressing Threat Of China

Globalization At Every Aspect Has Completely And Totally Failed

The Epoch Times
The Epoch Timeshttps://www.theepochtimes.com/
Tired of biased news? The Epoch Times is truthful, factual news that other media outlets don't report. No spin. No agenda. Just honest journalism like it used to be.

Now Lawyers Are Looking for the Epstein List, Too!

So it turns out that when FBI Director Kash...

Remember Epsteinโ€™s โ€œLittle Black Booksโ€?

Image of Bill Clinton getting a massage from Jeffrey...

On the Major Leagueโ€™s periphery: A major trip through the minors

For Nick Dunn, the trek through the minors is a trifecta of physical, mental, and organizational hurdles filled with politics, roster volatility, and injuries.

Private Citizens are Now Looking into Epstein Client List

Most Americans have never felt so betrayed and confused by a president and his admin as they are by the Trump admin over the Epstein client list issue.

Peace In Ukraine Wonโ€™t End The Westโ€™s Hybrid War On Russia

The Westโ€™s Hybrid War on Russia to follow peace in Ukraine is inevitable due to neoconservatives and liberal-globalists in its decision-making ecosystem.

Hackers Target Appleโ€™s Mac Users With New Malware Hidden in Popular Apps

MacOS malware, ZuRu is targeting Apple users, embedding malicious code and a hacking tool into popular utilities used for remote connections and server management.

Fetterman Backs ICE, Calls Abolition Push โ€˜Outrageousโ€™

Sen. Fetterman voiced support for ICE, calling demands to dismantle the agency โ€œinappropriate and outrageous.โ€

DOJ Shuts Down Investigation on T-Mobile-UScellular Merger

DOJ no longer opposes the merger of T-Mobile and UScellular and has closed its investigation into the matter, the department said in a July 10 statement.

Trump Visits Central Texas, Epicenter of Catastrophic Flood That Killed More Than 120

President Trump landed in Central Texas for first-hand look at damage from devastating flood claiming the lives of more than 120 people statewide.

State Department Says Reorganization Plan to Move Ahead Quickly After Supreme Court Ruling

State Dept to reorganize plans following Supreme Court's allowing Trump admin to proceed with layoffs of fed workers and overhaul of federal agencies.

Trump Says US Has Struck Deal With NATO to Supply Weapons to Ukraine

President Donald Trump said on July 10 that he has struck a new deal with NATO under which the United States will supply weapons to Ukraine

RFK Jr. Bans Illegal Immigrants From Government-Funded Programs

HHS Sec. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is rescinding a 1998 interpretation of a law that allowed illegal immigrants to access certain government-funded programs.

Rubio Set to Visit Malaysia for ASEAN Meetings Amid Tariff Tensions

A delegation including U.S. Sec. of State Marco Rubio will travel to Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, for series of high-profile meetings between July 11 and 12.
spot_img

Related Articles