What does the SCOTUS ruling on faithless electors mean?

Contact Your Elected Officials

The Supreme Court ruled states can bind faithless electors. Fox News chief legal analyst Shannon Bream breaks down what the ruling means.

Transcript

Sandra Smith: Right to this. The Supreme Court decision just out. Shannon Bream is standing by with breaking news for us. As expected, we’re starting to get some, some rulings from the Supreme Court. Our chief legal correspondent anchor on Fox News at night, Shannon Bream. Shannon what do you have. Good morning.

Shannon Bream: Yes Sandra, I’m reading right now. We have a pair of cases that involve faithless electors, people who are pledged and chosen by their states to go to the Electoral College and vote based on how the state basically tells them to vote out, how the popular vote went down. 

There were a group of voters from Washington State, there was another in Colorado, who both challenged this last time around saying, I want to be able to and I have the freedom and the right to, when I get to the Electoral College they do, after the the popular vote all across the country, I want to go vote how I want to and the state said, no. In some states you can fine or sanction people. There are other remedies and methods for stopping them from doing what they do or punishing them if they do that.

Today in a unanimous opinion the Supreme Court has said no, if you are an elector, you are chosen by your state, you got to follow the rules. It was one of those arguments. It was one of the first that they did by teleconference over the phone, and across-the-board we uniformly heard them saying, I don’t understand how this would work. It would be chaotic. There were questions raised about bribes. What if somebody started bribing electors. If you only have a swing of 5 to 10 electors who decide to do their own thing, that can actually change an election in a very tight year.

So Justice Kagan writes for the majority here and she says, 

โ€œAmong the devices states have long used to achieve their objective all these pledge laws designed to impress on electors their roles as agents of others. A State follows in the same tradition if, like Washington, it chooses to sanction an elector for breaching his promise. Then too, the State instructs its electors that they have no ground for reversing the vote of millions of its citizens. That direction accords with the Constitutionโ€”as well as with the trust of a Nation that here, We the People rule.โ€

So they said listen, these states got it right, if you have an elector who goes to the Electoral College you can bind them as a state to vote the way that they said they would which is based on your State’s popular vote. And sometimes they do split. Occasionally there are a couple of states that will split off how the electors go, or how their popular vote goes, but the bottom line is here the courts agreed on this one and Sandra, we don’t often see 9 agreeing opinions these days.

Sandra Smith: Okay if Shannon Bream on that for us.

CHIAFALO ET AL. v. WASHINGTON PDF

When Americans cast ballots for presidential candidates, their votes actually go toward selecting members of the Electoral College, whom each State appoints based on the popular returns. The States have devised mechanisms to ensure that the electors they appoint vote for the presidential candidate their citizens have preferred. With two partial exceptions, every State appoints a slate of electors selected by the political party whose candidate has won the Stateโ€™s popular vote. Most States also compel electors to pledge to support the nominee of that party. Relevant here, 15 States back up their pledge laws with some kind of sanction. Almost all of these States immediately remove a socalled โ€œfaithless electorโ€ from his position, substituting an alternate whose vote the State reports instead. A few States impose a monetary fine on any elector who flouts his pledge. Three Washington electors, Peter Chiafalo, Levi Guerra, and Esther John (the Electors), violated their pledges to support Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election. In response, the State fined the Electors $1,000 apiece for breaking their pledges to support the same candidate its voters had. The Electors challenged their fines in state court, arguing that the Constitution gives members of the Electoral College the right to vote however they please. The Washington Superior Court rejected that claim, and the State Supreme Court affirmed, relying on Ray v. Blair, 343 U. S. 214. In Ray, this Court upheld a pledge requirementโ€”though one without a penalty to back it up. Ray held that pledges were consistent with the Constitutionโ€™s text and our Nationโ€™s history, id., at 225โ€“230; but it reserved the question whether a State can enforce that requirement through legal sanctions.

19-465_i425

The Thinking Conservative
The Thinking Conservativehttps://www.thethinkingconservative.com/
The goal of THE THINKING CONSERVATIVE is to help us educate ourselves on conservative topics of importance to our freedom and our pursuit of happiness. We do this by sharing conservative opinions on all kinds of subjects, from all types of people, and all kinds of media, in a way that will challenge our perceptions and help us to make educated choices.

Remember Epsteinโ€™s โ€œLittle Black Booksโ€?

Image of Bill Clinton getting a massage from Jeffrey...

On the Major Leagueโ€™s periphery: A major trip through the minors

For Nick Dunn, the trek through the minors is a trifecta of physical, mental, and organizational hurdles filled with politics, roster volatility, and injuries.

Private Citizens are Now Looking into Epstein Client List

Most Americans have never felt so betrayed and confused by a president and his admin as they are by the Trump admin over the Epstein client list issue.

Peace In Ukraine Wonโ€™t End The Westโ€™s Hybrid War On Russia

The Westโ€™s Hybrid War on Russia to follow peace in Ukraine is inevitable due to neoconservatives and liberal-globalists in its decision-making ecosystem.

Epstein Case Closed?

The DOJ and FBI announced on Sunday evening of the July 4th holiday weekend that Jeffry Epstein had no client list and didnโ€™t kill himself in prison.

Federal Judge Blocks Trumpโ€™s Birthright Citizenship Order After Supreme Court Ruling

Judge barred Trump admin from enforcing EO limiting birthright citizenship, after Supreme Court restricted judges from issuing nationwide injunctions.

California Might Stop Making Necessary Debt Payments for 2 Years

California State Legislature met the budget submission deadline and it was signed by the governor, but they still need to cut $12 billion in spending.

MP Materials Secures Rare Earths Deal With DOD, Shares Surge 50 Percent

MP Materials Corp. announced a public-private partnership with the DOD to build out rare earth magnet supply chain and reduce dependency on China.

Ex-CIA Director Brennan Says DOJ Hasnโ€™t Contacted Him About an Investigation

Former CIA Dir Brennan said he hasn't been contacted by DOJ, FBI, or CIA following reports he and former FBI Dir. Comey are under investigation.

RFK Jr. Bans Illegal Immigrants From Government-Funded Programs

HHS Sec. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is rescinding a 1998 interpretation of a law that allowed illegal immigrants to access certain government-funded programs.

Rubio Set to Visit Malaysia for ASEAN Meetings Amid Tariff Tensions

A delegation including U.S. Sec. of State Marco Rubio will travel to Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, for series of high-profile meetings between July 11 and 12.

US Will Collect More Than $300 Billion in Tariff Revenues This Year, Treasury Secretary Says

U.S. is on track to potentially raise โ€œwell over $300 billionโ€ in tariff income by end of the year, Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent said during WH Cabinet meeting.

Senate Panel Advances Trumpโ€™s CDC Director Nominee

A Senate committee on July 9 voted to advance the nomination of Susan Monarez to lead the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
spot_img

Related Articles