How to Thwart the Nefarious Propaganda Technique of Projection

Overview

One of the most effective and devious methods of mass deception is falsely accusing others of oneโ€™s own misdeeds. This is called โ€œprojectingโ€ or โ€œaccusation in a mirror,โ€ and it was used by:

  • corrupt politicians in ancient Rome to purge a statesman who stood in the way of their graft.
  • the Nazis to launch World War II.
  • influential people in Rwanda to incite a genocide.

Certain moral frameworks that have gained traction in modern times permit and even encourage this type of propaganda.

Although it can be hard to determine who is projecting and who is the target, this can be accomplished with an awareness of human nature and vital research skills.

What is Projection?

The social scientist Jacques Ellul explained the nature of projection in a classic book titled Propaganda: The Formation of Menโ€™s Attitudes:

The propagandist will not accuse the enemy of just any misdeed; he will accuse him of the very intention that he himself has and of trying to commit the very crime that he himself is about to commit. He who wants to provoke a war not only proclaims his own peaceful intentions but also accuses the other party of provocation. He who uses concentration camps accuses his neighbor of doing so. He who intends to establish a dictatorship always insists that his adversaries are bent on dictatorship. [Hat Tip: Stella Morabito]

Another social scientist named Roger Mucchielli explained why projection is so effective in a French book titled Psychology of Advertising and Propaganda. Loosely translated via Google, he notes that โ€œthe advantages of mirror charging are many,โ€ such as:

  • placing โ€œhonest peopleโ€ in a โ€œstate of self-defense.โ€
  • depriving โ€œthe enemyโ€ of โ€œhis arguments.โ€
  • convincing โ€œeveryoneโ€ to โ€œbe on the side of โ€˜the just Causeโ€™.โ€

These โ€œadvantagesโ€ are vividly illustrated in history and current events.

Rome

In the first century BC, a Roman statesman named Publius Rutilius Rufusโ€”who was famed for having high integrityโ€”was prosecuted for and convicted of extortion. According to historians of that era, this was an unjust act of revenge by corrupt officials because Rufus had stopped them from overtaxing citizens and pocketing the excess money.

Modern philosophers Ryan Holiday and Stephen Hanselman describe the tactic used against Rufus like this:

Accuse the honest man of precisely the opposite of what theyโ€™re doing, of the sin you yourself are doing. Use their reputation against them. Muddy the waters. Stain them with lies. [Hat Tip: Larry Reed]

While this projection was targeted at an individual, it has also been used against nations.

World War II

Fast forward to September 1, 1939, when Nazi Germany launched a pre-dawn military raid on Poland. This marked the official start of World War II, the deadliest and most widespread conflict in world history.

Ph.D. historian Alexandra Richie explains how the Nazis used projection to justify their assault on Poland:

  • โ€œThe military attack against Poland was masterminded by Hitler,โ€ who was โ€œdetermined to make it look as if the Poles had provoked the hostilitiesโ€ by โ€œstaging numerous false-flag operations and โ€˜Polish provocationsโ€™ against Germans.โ€
  • โ€œThe most infamous of these was the staged attack at a radio stationโ€ near the German-Polish border just hours before the Nazis raided Poland. To carry out this plot, the Nazis murdered a local German who was โ€œsympathetic to Poland,โ€ placed his body at the radio station, and โ€œpretended that Polesโ€ had killed the manโ€”using his dead body as โ€œevidence.โ€
  • โ€œIt was a lie from beginning to end,โ€ but the Nazis were โ€œsoon churning out stories about the heinous attack,โ€ and by the next morning, โ€œHitler was already usingโ€ this Nazi-committed murder โ€œto justify his invasion of Poland.โ€

Evidence of this scheme mainly comes from a former Nazi military official who testified that he participated in it. Yet, Nazi sympathizers claim that โ€œthe whole story might have been invented by the Allies to cover up an actual attack by Polish insurgents.โ€

Hitlerโ€™s minister of propagandaโ€”the infamous Joseph Goebbelsโ€”was well aware of the tactic of projection and brazenly accused Germanyโ€™s opponents of utilizing it. โ€œThe cleverest trick used in propaganda against Germany,โ€ said Goebbels in a 1934 speech, โ€œwas to accuse Germany of what our enemies themselves were doing.โ€

Rwanda

Another projection that spawned a tidal wave of murder was deployed during the 1994 genocide in Rwanda. In just 13 weeks, hundreds of thousands of people in the nationโ€™s ethnic majority (the Hutus) tortured, raped, and slaughtered about 75% of the nationโ€™s minority (the Tutsis) and anyone who tried to shelter them. Estimates of the death toll range from at least 500,000 to more than 800,000.

In the โ€œmost authoritative sourceโ€ on this bloodbathโ€”a book titled Leave None to Tell the Storyโ€”Ph.D. historian Alison Des Forges details how projection was employed:

  • Government officials, journalists, scholars, celebrities, business leaders, teachers, and healthcare workers stirred hatred of the Tutsis by accusing them of planning to murder the Hutus, which was โ€œfalse information meant to spur the Hutu massacres of Tutsi.โ€
  • A photocopied document found in one of the nationโ€™s most blood-soaked cities called for recruiting more Hutus to join in the killings by:
    • using โ€œlies, exaggeration, ridicule, and innuendo to attack the opponent.โ€
    • staging fake โ€œevents to lend credence to propaganda.โ€
    • imputing โ€œto enemies exactly what they and their own party are planning to do.โ€
  • Although โ€œthere is no proofโ€ that leaders of the genocide โ€œwere familiar with this particular document,โ€ โ€œthey regularly used the techniques that it described.โ€
  • Since the leaders of the genocide โ€œregularly attributed to others the actions its own supporters had taken or would be taking,โ€ potential victims learned to listen to the leadersโ€™ radio broadcasts โ€œto find outโ€ what they โ€œwould be doingโ€ next.

Moral Relativism

The author of Rwandan genocide recruiting document appeals to Vladimir Leninโ€”the leader of Russiaโ€™s Communist revolutionโ€”to convince readers that โ€œmoral considerations are irrelevantโ€ when it comes to โ€œhow to sway the public most effectively.โ€

That mindset echoes a speech Lenin gave in 1920 before the Russian Young Communist League. After declaring that โ€œwe reject ethicsโ€ based on โ€œGodโ€™s commandments,โ€ Lenin stated that โ€œour morality is entirely subordinated to the interestsโ€ of advancing Communism.

Leninโ€™s doctrine was also embraced by Saul Alinsky, the influential leftist who was the topic of Hillary Clintonโ€™s 1969 college thesis. In his famed book, Rules for Radicals, Alinsky wrote that the โ€œends justify almost any means,โ€ and the โ€œmost unethical of all means is the non-use of any means.โ€

In other words, Alinsky, Lenin, and the Rwandan demagogues considered it immoral to let ethics get in the way of what they wanted. This stance permits and even embraces slander, which is the core of projection.

Slander is strictly forbidden by the Bibleโ€™s ninth commandment against giving โ€œfalse testimony against your neighbor.โ€ Thus, Albert Einstein noted in 1940 as Nazis were vilifying Jews that โ€œonly the Church stood squarely across the path of Hitlerโ€™s campaign for suppressing truth.โ€ In contrast, Einstein was sorely disappointed that Germanyโ€™s โ€œuniversitiesโ€ and โ€œnewspapersโ€ were quickly โ€œsilenced.โ€

However, the portion of the U.S. population who identify as Christians has declined from about 90% in the early 1990s to 63% in 2022. As for others with biblical moral foundations, less than 2% of U.S. residents say they are Jewish by faith.

Even more telling than that, a scientific survey conducted in 2005 found that โ€œjust one out of every six adults (16%) claim they make their moral choices based on the content of the Bible.โ€ And this percentage would undoubtedly be smaller if one could actually measure what people do instead of what they claim to do.

Concurrent with the widespread decline in biblical ethics, many have adopted a framework called postmodernism. Generally speaking, this is the belief that there are no moral absolutes and that all ethics are personal and situational. This has rapidly become the dominant view in America.

Less than two decades ago in 2007, a scientific survey conducted by Pew Research found that 78% of U.S. residents completely or mostly agreed that โ€œthere are clear and absolute standards for what is right and wrong.โ€ Just seven years later in 2014, Pew found that only 33% agreed with that statement.

The surrounding language of the survey questions in 2007 and 2014 was different, so some of the drastic drop from 78% to 33% may be due to this. Regardless, these data suggest that many millions of people could justify slander to achieve their objectives.

Another influential moral code is found in the religion of Islam, which generally forbids lying except in three circumstances, one of which is โ€œat times of war, as a tactic or to demoralize the enemy and win the war.โ€ Given that certain factions of Islam have declared a perpetual war until Israel is โ€œobliterated,โ€ and others have joined a jihad to โ€œachieve global dominationโ€”through any means, including violence,โ€ Islamโ€™s permission to lie in โ€œtimes of warโ€ provides broad leeway for slander.

The bottom line is that significant portions of the U.S. and world populations have no firm moral barricades against projection.

Given the effectiveness and potential deadliness of projection, it is important to learn how to spot and expose it.

Confirmation Bias

The first bulwark against projection is to be constantly aware that people are prone to confirmation bias. This is the tendency to blindly accept anything that accords with their preexisting beliefs.

Skilled propagandists take advantage of this human weakness by using โ€œpre-propaganda,โ€ or easily believed ploys like quoting people out of context. As Mucchielli notes, they do this because:

the accusations of lies awarded to adversaries can be made easier when we have started by injecting the public with misleading information as if it came from these adversaries.

In other words, expert manipulators donโ€™t try to deceive the public in one big leap but use a mounting series of falsehoods to make people receptive to the ultimate lie.

A simple antidote to such brainwashing is healthy skepticism, especially when it comes to claims that accord with oneโ€™s current beliefs. A rational and well-informed assessment cannot occur unless knee-jerk reactions are defeated.

Mind Reading

Another telltale sign of projection is the use of unproven assertions about peopleโ€™s intentions, often woven with facts to provide an air of credibility. In the words of Ellul:

  • โ€œThe truth that pays off is in the realm of facts. The necessary falsehoods, which also pay off, are in the realm of intentions and interpretations. This is a fundamental rule for propaganda analysis.โ€
  • โ€œThe accusation aimed at the otherโ€™s intention clearly reveals the intention of the accuser. But the public cannot see this because the revelation is interwoven with facts.โ€
  • โ€œThe mechanism used here is to slip from the facts, which would demand factual judgment, to moral terrain and to ethical judgment.โ€
  • Even โ€œintelligent people can be made to swallow professed intentions by well-executed propaganda.โ€

People are often susceptible to such disinformation because they think they are better at reading people than they actually are. Per a 2003 paper in the Journal of Research in Personality, โ€œEvery adult possesses and usesโ€ the โ€œability to recognize emotions, intentions, and thoughts of others,โ€ but โ€œthe results of our research show that the self-reported mind-reading ability was not correlated with actual performance.โ€ This lack of self-awareness can make people suckers for projection.

Again, a little introspection goes a long way. Simply coming to grips with the fact that humans donโ€™t have the magical ability to read minds can foil the tactics of propagandists.

Vetting the Accusation

In addition to being aware of how demagogues exploit human foibles, it is vitally important to learn the necessary research skills to determine the truthfulness of accusations and counter-accusations.

Certain influencers, like Washington Post columnist Philip Bump, claim that โ€œdoing your own research is a good way to end up being wrong.โ€ This, he says, is proven by a 2023 study published by the prestigious journal Nature.

However, Bump fails to reveal that the authors of the study โ€œhired professional fact checkers from leading national media organizationsโ€ to โ€œdetermineโ€ whatโ€™s โ€œtrueโ€ and โ€œfalse.โ€ Given the horrid track record of so-called fact checkers and the widespread breakdown of journalistic and academic integrity, this fatally flawed study only reinforces the need to conduct your own research.

Because the U.S. education system has failed to equip the vast majority of the general public and even most college graduates with basic analytical skills, Just Facts developed an initiative to fill a major part of this void. Called Just Facts Academy, this resource provides videos that teach the skills needed to sort out fact from fiction.

Many research skills are easy and quick to learn, but applying them often takes considerable time and effort. This is the price one must pay for being a rampart against projection instead of a dupe for it.

Conclusion

In the words of Jacques Ellul, โ€œNothing is worse in times of danger than to live in a dream world.โ€ This is what perpetrators of projection do by creating a false reality in peopleโ€™s minds, and history shows how these mass mental rapes can be deadly.

To thwart this, stay aware that many people have no moral restraints against projecting, curb your own confirmation biases, donโ€™t jump to conclusions about otherโ€™s intentions, master research skills, and share your findings as broadly as possible.

By James D. Agresti

James D. Agresti is the president of Just Facts, a research and educational institute dedicated to publishing facts about public policies and teaching research skills.

Just Facts Daily
Just Facts Dailyhttps://www.justfacts.com/
Just Facts Daily publishes comprehensive and rigorously documented facts about public policy issues for Just Facts, a research and educational institute.

Columns

Trans-wormal

No worm ever said "I am anthropomorphizing, I am a butterfly" to a toad or flock of geese and expected acknowledgement and support.

How a Chinese Government Statistician Was Forced to Report Fake Data

Chinese local govt employee produced a non-authorized report on bees and was visited by police and threatened with being sent to a mental hospital.

โ€˜This One Time, at Groomer Campโ€™

All Camp Brave Trails programs focus on helping LGBTQ+ youth find what they need most to thrive: their people, their place, and their passion.

Why Recognizing a Palestinian State Now Undermines U.S. Interestsย 

A recent American Conservativeย article suggests President Trump recognize a Palestinian state, but this would undermine the interests of the United States.

Harvardโ€™s China Ties Under Scrutiny as US Targets Student Visas

Following Trump adminโ€™s action to vet Chinese nationals studying in US for ties to the CCP, Harvard's involvement with Beijing has come to the fore.

News

Guatemalan Deportee Arrives in US After Judge Orders Trump Admin to Facilitate Return

โ€œAmericaโ€™s asylum system was never intended to be used as a de facto amnesty program or a catch-all, get-out-of-deportation-free card,โ€ McLaughlin said.

Trump-Musk Feud Escalates Over Spending Bill: 5 Things to Know

A public feud between Musk and Trump took a turn for the worse. Musk claimed president wouldnโ€™t have won without him and president suggested Muskโ€™s subsidies could be pulled.

Supreme Court Rules 9-0 Wisconsin Violated First Amendment by Denying Tax Exemption to Catholic Charity

Supreme Court ruled unanimously that WI violated the First Amendment by not granting Catholic charity an exemption from paying unemployment tax.

Appeals Court Rules San Diegoโ€™s Yoga Ban Is Unconstitutional

The city of San Diegoโ€™s ban on yoga classes in public parks and beaches was ruled unconstitutional by a federal appeals court.

Supreme Court Rejects Mexicoโ€™s Lawsuit Against Gun Companies

SCOTUS said gun companies should not face lawsuit in which Mexican govt was trying to hold them liable for cartel-related violence involving firearms from US.

FDA Not Recommending Newly Approved COVID-19 Vaccine: Official

FDA approved a new COVID-19 vaccine but is not recommending people receive it, the agencyโ€™s top vaccine officials said on June 4.

Self-Sufficiency Summits in Ohio Reflect Surging Interest in Homesteading

After an age of reliance on store-bought items, many Americans are returning to a self-sufficient lifestyle and growing and raising the food they consume.

Judge Requires Trump Admin to Provide Due Process for Deportees in El Salvador Prison

Boasberg ordered Trump admin to provide habeas relief for individuals it deported and are held in Salvadoran maximum security prison.
spot_img

Related Articles