Mark Levin and Stanley Kurtz discuss the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) Rule

Contact Your Elected Officials

Stanley Kurtz, senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, talks with Mark Levin about the “Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Rule” (AFFH) added by former President Barack Obama to the 1968 Fair Housing Act, which purposes to expand federal influence over suburbia. (Watch full Interview Here)

Obama and his wing of the Democratic Party viewed suburbs as “fundamentally unjust” communities that prevent taxation from flowing into the urban cities they surround. ~ Stanley Kurtz

Clip from Mark Levin and Stanley Kurtz discussing the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Rule.

Transcript

Mark Levin: Let’s start at the beginning. What is it that the Federal Government did to ensure that the civil rights and equality would exist in housing all across the country?

Stanley Kurtz: Well, Mark, the Federal Government, during the Civil Rights era, passed the Fair Housing Act of 1968, and rightly, the Fair Housing Act prevents discrimination in housing so if people come to buy a home or to rent an apartment they should be treated in the same way regardless of race, regardless of ethnicity, if they’re immigrants, regardless of national origin. That is the law and it should be the law and HUD under both Democrat and Republican administrations enforces that law.

Mark Levin: So, this seems morally correct under every circumstance. It seems like something that’s been in place a very long time. It seems to be working pretty well, but then Obama becomes President of the United States, and what does Obama do with that 1968 statue?

Stanley Kurtz: Well, Obama represents a segment of the Democratic Party, an increasingly influential segment that really doesn’t think well of the suburbs. Of course, as you mentioned, they want Suburban votes, but what they’re a little less say eager to have understood is that they they considered suburbs themselves in some ways fundamentally unjust. Why? Because when people move out to the suburbs they take their tax money with them and that is viewed by Obama and many other Democrats as a way of selfishly keeping your money from less well-off people in the cities. So the Obama Administration, riding on some language in the original Fair Housing Act that did not have all the meanings he gave to it, created a really massive rule called Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing. Now, there was a brief mention of Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing in the original fair housing, but all it really meant, at the time, was that the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development should take positive steps to make sure that people didn’t discriminate in housing between people of different races or ethnicities etc., just as we said before. But Obama took that brief mention and created out of it a transformative rule, a little bit like Obamacare in that it’s a massive rule that does a great many things, and you have to keep delving and delving. The bottom line is that AFFA, the acronym for Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing would radically undercut the political an economic independence of America suburbs. It would allow bureaucrats in Washington, in the Department of Housing and Urban Development, to control zoning laws, to control the placement of transportation, and business districts, even to some degree the drawing of school districts. In other words, almost every important local governmental responsibility could under AFFH could fall into the de facto control of the Fed’s

Mark Levin: So, effectively, in so many crucial respects to the people who live in these communities or the people who want to live in these communities the federal government would nationalize, federalized decisions respecting the economy, schooling, law enforcement, housing, zoning, commercial activity, transportation hubs. Have I missed something?

Stanley Kurtz: You probably have, Mark. I probably missed something because there are so many things in the AFFH regulation, it’s hard to keep track. For example, I’ll give you just one example of something we both missed. quote-unquote. The AFFH will allow the fence to push local governments into Regional Governing Consorcia. Now what does that bit of gobbledygook actually mean? It means that it will try to create a layer of government in between the federal government and local government, a layer of government that corresponds to your greater metropolitan area, so if you are in say Montgomery County outside of Philadelphia, it will try to remove your governing responsibilities and hand them over to the greater Philadelphia metropolitan area, which will probably end up taking a chunk of your tax money. So there’s a lot in the AFFH. 


On Thursday, July 23, 2020, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Dr. Ben Carson announced that he is stripping Obama’s AFFH Rule from the Fair Housing Act, saying the rule “was an overreach of unelected Washington bureaucrats into local communities”.

 More Information on Secretary Ben Carson Terminates 2015 AFFH Rule


Presidential Candidate Joe Biden’s Stance on Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Rule

Joe Biden will re-implement the Obama-Biden Administrationโ€™s Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Rule

From Joe Biden President Campaign Website

Biden will implement the Obama-Biden Administrationโ€™s Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Rule requiring communities receiving certain federal funding to proactively examine housing patterns and identify and address policies that have a discriminatory effect. The Trump Administration suspended this rule in 2018. Biden will ensure effective and rigorous enforcement of the Fair Housing Act and the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act. And, he will reinstate the federal risk-sharing program which has helped secure financing for thousands of affordable rental housing units in partnership with housing finance agencies.  


Stanley Kurtz: Obama-era ‘Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Rule’ an attack on suburbs

Stanley Kurtz, senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, spoke to Mark Levin about the “Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Rule” (AFFH) added by former President Barack Obama to the 1968 Fair Housing Act, which the conservative scholar said has aimed to expand federal influence over suburbia.

Kurtz said in an interview airing Sunday at 8 p.m. ET on “Life, Liberty & Levin” that Obama and his wing of the Democratic Party viewed suburbs as “fundamentally unjust” communities that prevent taxation from flowing into the urban cities they surround.

On Thursday, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Dr. Ben Carson announced that he is stripping Obama’s AFFH Rule from the Fair Housing Act, saying the rule “was an overreach of unelected Washington bureaucrats into local communities” — a point echoed by Kurtz.

Carson called the rule a “ruse for social engineering under the guise of desegregation — essentially turning HUD into a national zoning board.”

Kurtz, in his interview with Levin, said Obama “represents an increasingly influential segment of the Democratic Party that really doesn’t think well of the suburbs.”

“Of course, as [Levin] mentioned, [Democrats] want suburban votes. What they’re a little less eager to have understood is they consider suburbs themselves in some ways fundamentally unjust.”

Kurtz said Obama Democrats oppose the structure of the nation’s suburbs because, much of the time, the people that move out of liberal cities and settle in the suburbs often do so to escape high taxation and regulation in urban areas.

“That is viewed by Obama and many other Democrats as a way of selfishly keeping your money from less well-off people in the cities,” he said. “So the Obama administration, riding on some language in the original Fair Housing Act that did not have all the meanings he gave to it, created a really massive rule called [AFFH].”

Read Full Article on FoxNews.com

The Thinking Conservative
The Thinking Conservativehttps://www.thethinkingconservative.com/
The goal of THE THINKING CONSERVATIVE is to help us educate ourselves on conservative topics of importance to our freedom and our pursuit of happiness. We do this by sharing conservative opinions on all kinds of subjects, from all types of people, and all kinds of media, in a way that will challenge our perceptions and help us to make educated choices.

Liberal Democrat Content Creators are Despicable Defamationers

What should Christian conservatives do when confronted with false information to the point of bearing false witness against someone like President Trump?

Ben Shapiro Warning Me Not to Listen to InfoWars Makes Me Want to Listen 10x Harder

This rant from Ben Shapiro reveals more about him and his low opinion of his audience to whom he peddles his slop than it does about its target, Alex Jones.

Epsteinโ€™s Aftermath: Planes, Blames, and Autocrats

There are so many real, honest great journalists reporting the news on the internet these days that some really good content gets overlooked.

Why the Trump Administration is Sitting on the Epstein Files

President Trump, AG Bondi, and FBI Dir. Patel have the advantage over us in that they see the big overall picture when it comes to the Epstein List.

Trumpโ€™s โ€œMajor Statementโ€ On Russia Is A Clumsy Attempt To Thread The Needle

The โ€œmajor statementโ€ on Russia Trump hyped up turned out to be an attempt to thread the needle between escalating US involvement in Ukrainian and walking away from it.

7.3 Magnitude Earthquake Hits Off Alaska Coast; Tsunami Warning Issued

A 7.3-magnitude earthquake struck off the coast of southern Alaska prompting federal officials to issue a tsunami warning.

University of Southern California Faces $300 Million in Federal Funding Cuts, Staff Layoffs

USC faces potential revenue loss of hundreds of millions of dollars in federal funds and staff layoffs, amid "volatile external environment,โ€ Interim President says.

The Marketโ€™s Focus Returns to Tariffs

Surging tariff revenue is expected to help the Treasury Department better manage the federal government budget deficit.

DHS Secretary Suggests Liquid Carry-On Limits on Flights Might Be Eased

More changes could be coming to the TSA, including whether more liquids can be taken through airport security, DHS Secretary Kristi Noem suggested.

Washington Announces Investigation Into Brazilian Trade Practices, Digital Payment Services

U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer announced the opening of an investigation into Brazilโ€™s โ€œunfairโ€ trading practices on July 15, 2025.

Pharma Imports Could Face Tariffs by End of the Month, Trump Says

US will institute tariffs on pharmaceutical imports โ€œprobably at the end of the month,โ€ President Trump told reporters at Joint Base Andrews.

RFK Jr. Fires Top Aides, Appoints New Acting Chief of Staff

Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has fired several top advisers, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) confirmed on July 16.

Trump Says He Will Impose Tariffs of More Than 10 Percent on Smaller Nations

President Donald Trump said on Tuesday that he intends to impose tariff rates of more than 10 percent on imports from โ€œsmaller nations.โ€
spot_img

Related Articles