Save the Constitution From Big Tech

Contact Your Elected Officials

Facebook and Twitter banned President Trump and numerous supporters after last weekโ€™s disgraceful Capitol riot, and Google, Apple and Amazon blocked Twitter alternative Parlerโ€”all based on claims of โ€œincitement to violenceโ€ and โ€œhate speech.โ€ Silicon Valley titans cite their ever-changing โ€œterms of service,โ€ but their selective enforcement suggests political motives.

Conventional wisdom holds that technology companies are free to regulate content because they are private, and the First Amendment protects only against government censorship. That view is wrong: Google, Facebook and Twitter should be treated as state actors under existing legal doctrines. Using a combination of statutory inducements and regulatory threats, Congress has co-opted Silicon Valley to do through the back door what government cannot directly accomplish under the Constitution.

It is โ€œaxiomatic,โ€ the Supreme Court held in Norwood v. Harrison (1973), that the government โ€œmay not induce, encourage or promote private persons to accomplish what it is constitutionally forbidden to accomplish.โ€ Thatโ€™s what Congress did by enacting Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, which not only permits tech companies to censor constitutionally protected speech but immunizes them from liability if they do so.

The justices have long held that the provision of such immunity can turn private action into state action. In Railway Employeesโ€™ Department v. Hanson (1956), they found state action in private union-employer closed-shop agreementsโ€”which force all employees to join the unionโ€”because Congress had passed a statute immunizing such agreements from liability under state law. In Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives Association(1989), the court again found state action in private-party conductโ€”drug tests for company employeesโ€”because federal regulations immunized railroads from liability if they conducted those tests. In both cases, as with Section 230, the federal government didnโ€™t mandate anything; it merely pre-empted state law, protecting certain private parties from lawsuits if they engaged in the conduct Congress was promoting.

Section 230 is the carrot, and thereโ€™s also a stick: Congressional Democrats have repeatedly made explicit threats to social-media giants if they failed to censor speech those lawmakers disfavored. In April 2019, Louisiana Rep. Cedric Richmond warned Facebook and Google that they had โ€œbetterโ€ restrict what he and his colleagues saw as harmful content or face regulation: โ€œWeโ€™re going to make it swift, weโ€™re going to make it strong, and weโ€™re going to hold them very accountable.โ€ New York Rep. Jerrold Nadler added: โ€œLetโ€™s see what happens by just pressuring them.โ€

By Vivek Ramaswamy and Jed Rubenfeld

Read Full Article on WSJ.com

The Thinking Conservative
The Thinking Conservativehttps://www.thethinkingconservative.com/
The goal of THE THINKING CONSERVATIVE is to help us educate ourselves on conservative topics of importance to our freedom and our pursuit of happiness. We do this by sharing conservative opinions on all kinds of subjects, from all types of people, and all kinds of media, in a way that will challenge our perceptions and help us to make educated choices.

Why is the Epstein Victim List Longer than the Client List?

Bondi said her responsibility is to protect identities of underage girls sexually abused by Epstein, but a good number of victims have come forward.

Stirring the gravy

โ€œYou might be a Pennsylvanian-Italian if you claim Italian ancestry and participated in San Marziale festivities at Holy Angels Church in Kulpmont, PA.

Flood of Lies

The tragedy still unfolding after the historic Texas floods should be cause for unity, but Democrats weaponize the catastrophe for themselves.

Now Lawyers Are Looking for the Epstein List, Too!

So it turns out that when FBI Director Kash...

Remember Epsteinโ€™s โ€œLittle Black Booksโ€?

Image of Bill Clinton getting a massage from Jeffrey...

DOJ Drops Charges Against Utah Surgeon Accused of Dumping COVID-19 Vaccines, Issuing Fake Vaccine Cards

Attorney General Pam Bondi has announced that the Justice Department is dropping charges against Utah plastic surgeon Dr. Kirk Moore.

Federal Judge Orders Trump Admin to Halt Immigration Operations Without Probable Cause in California

A federal judge issued a preliminary injunction temporarily blocking the Trump admin from immigration stops and arrests in LA without probable cause.

More Than 200 Arrests Made During ICE Operations on California Marijuana Farms

About 200 suspected illegal immigrants and four U.S. citizens were arrested after immigration operations were conducted on marijuana farms in Southern CA.

Hackers Target Appleโ€™s Mac Users With New Malware Hidden in Popular Apps

MacOS malware, ZuRu is targeting Apple users, embedding malicious code and a hacking tool into popular utilities used for remote connections and server management.

Trump Announces 30 Percent Tariff on EU, Mexico

President Donald Trump has announced a 30 percent tariff on imports from the European Union and Mexico, to go into effect on Aug. 1, 2025.

Tariff Windfall Drives Surprise $27 Billion US Budget Surplus in June

New data from Treasury Dept show that surging tariff revenues in June helped U.S. government post an unexpected budget surplus of $27 billion.

State Department Says Reorganization Plan to Move Ahead Quickly After Supreme Court Ruling

State Dept to reorganize plans following Supreme Court's allowing Trump admin to proceed with layoffs of fed workers and overhaul of federal agencies.

Trump Says US Has Struck Deal With NATO to Supply Weapons to Ukraine

President Donald Trump said on July 10 that he has struck a new deal with NATO under which the United States will supply weapons to Ukraine
spot_img

Related Articles