A Stop Vax Passports Task Force Webinar:
3 p.m. EDT, Wednesday, November 3
On October 25, an FDA Advisory Panel endorsed the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine for children ages 5-11 years. They took this action, despite presentations by experts, who raised concerns over the lack of safety and efficacy of the jabs and nearly 140k comments received from the public with many opposed to the expansion of vaccines to young children. According to the CDC’s own website, for example, “Cases of myocarditis reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) have occurred: After mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna), especially in male adolescents and young adults.”
Based on CDC’s own data, the risk of death from COVID for children is extremely low. Why vaccinate them? Pfizer argued children should be vaccinated to prevent transmission – to whom? – to adults? Is this latest vaccine volley intended to protect adults at the expense of our children?
“We’re never going to know how safe the vaccine is until we start giving it. That’s the way it is,” explained Dr. Eric Ruben, who sits on the FDA Advisory Panel.
The FDA has yet formally to authorize the vaccine, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) must also weigh-in with its own recommendation. If approved, which it is expected to do in early November, states like California will immediately begin to make the inoculations mandatory for schools —leaving little room for religious accommodations or medical exemptions.
And, reports of adverse reactions to the vaccine have been suppressed. Where censorship exists, how can consent be informed? The voices of those injured by the vaccine need to be heard.
The administration and its agencies state that the vaccines are proven safe and effective. Without long term studies, how can they know? Why, if children are least at risk, should they be subjected to gene therapies which may indeed injure them or affect their fertility?
The government is forcing new therapies onto children—therapies with questionable records of safety and rushed to market on an emergency basis, short-circuiting much of the usual testing for safety and efficacy. The stated goal is protecting the nation’s elderly and infirm. Is this a form of pharmaceutical child abuse?
Emergency shortcuts amid a pandemic may make sense for immunocompromised and the elderly. But for children aged 5 to 11years, the risk associated with Covid-19 is very low. According to the CDC, out of 737,990 Covid-19 deaths in America, only 455 have been reported in the 0-18 year-old category as of October 27, measuring only .06 percent of deaths. The CDC has not reported whether these young people who died with Covid had co-morbidities, such as cancer, heart disease or diabetes. Nor has the CDC reported whether these children died of Covid, or merely with Covid.
VAERS shows the number of people with possible adverse reactions including death, blood clots, heart issues, and much more, has far surpassed that of all previous vaccines. At any other time, these vaccines would have been pulled from the market. Instead, people who claim to have been injured by the vaccines are ignored, ridiculed, and censored from telling their stories.
Join us at 3 p.m. EDT, Wednesday, November 3 to hear uncensored accounts of those who have suffered serious injuries from the jab, and for an important conversation on Covid-19 vaccine mandates for children.
Nov 3, 2021 03:00 PM in Eastern Time (US and Canada)