Supreme Court Strikes Down Roe v. Wade Abortion Precedent

Contact Your Elected Officials
The Epoch Times Header

The announcement follows the unprecedented leak of the draft opinion

The Supreme Court on June 24 overturned Roe v. Wade, the seminal 1973 precedent that largely legalized abortion in the United States.

The court, in a 6โ€“3 ruling powered by its conservative majority, upheld a Mississippi law that bans abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy and to overturn Roe. Chief Justice John Roberts concurred with the courtโ€™s conservatives, but argued that he would have upheld the Mississippi law without taking the additional step of erasing the Roe precedent altogether.

The 116-page ruling also reversed the 1992 companion precedent known as Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which held that states canโ€™t impose significant restrictions on abortion before a fetus becomes viable for life outside the womb.

The Casey ruling didnโ€™t specify when viability occurs, but suggested it was somewhere around the 24-week gestation mark.

The June 24 ruling came in Dobbs v. Jackson Womenโ€™s Health Organization (court file 19-1392).

In the case, the only state-licensed abortion clinic in Mississippi opposed the stateโ€™s Gestational Age Act, which allows abortions after 15 weeks of gestation only for medical emergencies or severe fetal abnormality. Citing Roe, lower courts had held that the state statute was unconstitutional.

Politico published the draft document dated Feb. 10 on May 2 without disclosing its source. The tight-lipped court is investigating the leak, but details of the ongoing probe are few and far between.

Justice Samuel Alito wrote the majority opinion. The three dissenting justicesโ€”Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kaganโ€”took the unusual step of issuing a three-way joint dissent.

Alito explained in the courtโ€™s opinion why the majority believes Roe v. Wade was wrongly decided 49 years ago.

โ€œAbortion presents a profound moral issue on which Americans hold sharply conflicting views,โ€ he wrote.

โ€œSome believe fervently that a human person comes into being at conception and that abortion ends an innocent life. Others feel just as strongly that any regulation of abortion invades a womanโ€™s right to control her own body and prevents women from achieving full equality.

โ€œStill others in a third group think that abortion should be allowed under some but not all circumstances, and those within this group hold a variety of views about the particular restrictions that should be imposed.โ€

For the first 185 years after the U.S. Constitution was adopted, โ€œeach state was permitted to address this issue in accordance with the views of its citizens,โ€ but then, in 1973, the Supreme Court decided Roe v. Wade. Despite the fact that the Constitution doesnโ€™t mention abortion, the court found that โ€œit confers a broad right to obtain one.โ€

The court made no claim โ€œthat American law or the common law had ever recognized such a right, and its survey of history ranged from the constitutionally irrelevant (e.g., its discussion of abortion in antiquity) to the plainly incorrect (e.g., its assertion that abortion was probably never a crime under the common law),โ€ Alito wrote.

โ€œAfter cataloging a wealth of other information having no bearing on the meaning of the Constitution, the opinion concluded with a numbered set of rules much like those that might be found in a statute enacted by a legislature.โ€

The court created a scheme in which โ€œeach trimester of pregnancy was regulated differently, but the most critical line was drawn at roughly the end of the second trimester, which, at the time, corresponded to the point at which a fetus was thought to achieve โ€˜viability,โ€™ i.e., the ability to survive outside the womb.โ€

Even though the court acknowledged that states โ€œhad a legitimate interest in protecting โ€˜potential life,โ€™โ€ Alito wrote, it determined that this interest didnโ€™t justify imposing any restrictions on abortions in the pre-viability stage.

The court offered no explanation for this finding, which even abortion supporters have been hard-pressed to defend.

Alito noted that one high-profile constitutional scholar, John Hart Ely, wrote that he โ€œwould vote for a statute very much like the one the Court ended up draftingโ€ had he been โ€œa legislator,โ€ but in his view, Roe was โ€œnot constitutional lawโ€ at all โ€œand gave almost no sense of an obligation to try to be.โ€

Alito pointed to the dissenting opinion of Justice Byron White, who wrote that Roe v. Wade represented the โ€œexercise of raw judicial power.โ€ Alito added that the decision โ€œsparked a national controversy that has embittered our political culture for a half-century.โ€

In the three-way dissent, Breyer, Kagan, and Sotomayor lambasted the new majority opinion.

โ€œIt says that from the very moment of fertilization, a woman has no rights to speak of. A state can force her to bring a pregnancy to term, even at the steepest personal and familial costs,โ€ the justices wrote.

โ€œAn abortion restriction, the majority holds, is permissible whenever rational, the lowest level of scrutiny known to the law.

โ€œAnd because, as the court has often stated, protecting fetal life is rational, states will feel free to enact all manner of restrictions.โ€

By Matthew Vadum

Read Original Article on TheEpochTimes.com

The Epoch Times
The Epoch Timeshttps://www.theepochtimes.com/
Tired of biased news? The Epoch Times is truthful, factual news that other media outlets don't report. No spin. No agenda. Just honest journalism like it used to be.

Canada Forces Man to Remove Cameras From Private Property Amid Anti-Racism Push

Government expands its surveillance powers, while restricting citizens from monitoring their own property, citing concerns over โ€œracism.โ€

Are the E. Jean Carroll Lawsuits a RICO Case?

Trump lost his appeal in the E. Jean Carroll cases, leaving him liable for $83.3M. He plans to take the matter to the U.S. Supreme Court.

All Apologies For the Culture War Slop

"Forgive me for ignoring the elite-driven political/economic excesses, focusing instead on divisive culture war slop."

Rising sea levels are less of a threat than we were told

New study challenges climate alarmism: sea levels aren't rising faster than the past century, despite dire warnings of floods and mass migrations.

President Trump is Being Wrongfully Obstructed on Tariffs

Podcaster Zach De Gregorio, in โ€œWolves And Finance,โ€ delivers a sharp editorial unpacking the truth behind Trumpโ€™s international tariff policies.

Authors of โ€˜Astonishingโ€™ Study Showing Unvaccinated Kids Are Healthier Refused to Go Public With Results

Attorney Aaron Siri told the Senate a major study found vaccinated children were significantly more likely to develop chronic diseases.

US Government Imposes Sanctions on Cyber Scam Centers in Southeast Asia

U.S. govt has imposed sanctions on 19 individuals and entities for their alleged roles in an extensive network of scam centers in Burma and Cambodia.

DOJ Announces Federal Charges Against Suspect in Fatal Stabbing of Ukrainian Woman

DOJ charged man accused of fatally stabbing Ukrainian refugee on a light-rail in Charlotte, amid a growing national outcry over her murder.

Texas A&M Ousts 2 Officials After Student and Professor Clash Over Gender Identity Lesson

Texas A&M officials were removed and DOJ probe launched after video showed prof. dismissing student over gender lesson in children's literature class.

Trump Runs out of Patience With China, Sharpens His Words

President Donald Trumpโ€™s recent remarks targeting China and its allies mark a noticeable shift in tone.

Trump Signs Order Renaming Department of Defense as Department of War

President Donald Trump on Sept. 5 signed an executive order renaming the Department of Defense as the Department of War.

Trump Signs Executive Order Targeting Countries That Unlawfully Detain Americans

President Trump signed an EO on targeting the unlawful detention of American citizens around the world and to facilitate the release of hostages.

Trump Sends Warning to Venezuela After US Military Strikes Boat Allegedly Carrying Drugs

President Trump sent a warning to Venezuela after the U.S. military struck what the administration says was a boat carrying drugs in the Caribbean.
spot_img

Related Articles